Search Results

1. Kiriona - Estate of Hiromina Ratima Pakai [2017] Chief Judge's MB 35 (2017 CJ 35) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...presentation of the facts of the case to the Court or the Registrar. The Chief Judge may also make such other orders as, in the opinion of the Chief Judge, is necessary in the interests of justice to remedy the mistake or omission. [7] The applicant has requested that the Chief Judge amend the order that is the subject of this application. In terms of Tau v Nga Whānau O Morven & Glenavy – Waihao 903 Section IX block1 and Ashwell – Rawinia or Lavinia Ashwell (nee Russell)2 t...

2. LCRO 188/2019 QK v RJ (13 May 2020) [pdf, 116 KB]

   ...January 2020 explains: What the Standards Committee is trying to explain is that Mr RJ provided a copy of the letter sent to Mr YG and (separately) advised that probate had since been granted – rather than Mr RJ’s letter to Mr YG contained this information. [15] Ms Rice explained that the separate advice from Mr RJ to which she referred was provided in the course of his telephone conversation with the Complaints Service in early December. Ms Rice also referred to Ms QK’s ri...

3. [2022] NZEmpC 42 TPT Forests Ltd v Penfold [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...are entitled will be maintained; and (c) any privilege claim. [5] TPT now seeks to vary the existing search orders to allow Mr Whale to inspect the cloned devices and produce a report for the Court listing the files identified as TPT’s information. [6] If the orders sought are made, TPT intends to provide Mr Whale with the native files of all TPT’s documents identified as having been taken by Mr Penfold and/or Mr Stronge so Mr Whale can undertake the searches using those...

4. Rzoska v Randell - Succession to Te Maehe [2023] Chief Judge's MB155 (2023 CJ 155) [pdf, 397 KB]

   ...presentation of the facts of the case to the Court or the Registrar. The Chief Judge may also make such other orders as, in the opinion of the Chief Judge, is necessary in the interests of justice to remedy the mistake or omission. [11] The applicant has requested that the Chief Judge cancel the order that is the subject of this application. In terms of Tau v Nga Whānau O Morven & Glenavy – Waihao 903 Section IX block[1] and Ashwell – Rawinia or Lavinia Ashwell (nee Russell...

5. [2024] NZEnvC 177 Connor-Kingi v Whangarei District Council [pdf, 278 KB]

   ...members of Ngā Mahinga o Ngāti Kahu o Torongare had with the application was during the development of the Cultural Impact Assessment. She noted that other hapū members also participated in the hui to develop the CIA. [27] Ms Connor-Kingi claims that her appeal represents the interests of a wider group than her alone, and that the establishment of the incorporated society was pursued to avoid the appeal being progressed through one hapū member when an incorporated society w...

6. IAA v Maerean [2013] NZIACDT 6 (07 February 2013) [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...New Zealand as a licensed immigration adviser. Mr Sparks and Ms Maerean first had contact with their client when he arrived in New Zealand from the Philippines to take up work. They met him in person when he arrived, not having previously had any form of direct communication. [7] The Authority investigated, and to put the matter briefly, complains that: [7.1] Mr Sparks and Ms Maerean failed to act professionally in having Philippines colleagues provide immigration services, which should...

7. Baltasound v Paignton LCRO 222 / 2009 (19 May 2010) [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...lawyer can be 9 depended upon absolutely and that a lawyer who fails in this regard will be subject to professional discipline. [40] In this case little or no effort has been made by the Respondent to reasonably respond to the numerous requests made by the Applicant concerning the undertaking. He has remained unconcerned about the arrears being sought against the purchasers, has continued to justify his failure to meet his undertaking by reference to the arrears being in...

8. Hartlepool v Basildon LCRO 79 / 2009 (3 September 2009) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...Hartlepool faxes Mr Basildon instructing him to file a notice of appeal. 24 October Mr Basildon replies “I have no time to file or prepare anything until after 7 Nov 08 as discussed yesterday”. 4 November Ms Hartlepool faxes Mr Basildon requesting him to advise the Court that he is unable to take instructions but will be opposing costs. 7 November Ms Hartlepool faxes Mr Basildon stating “we will lodge application for leave out of time I wish you to do the appeal to the...

9. OX v PE LCRO 224 / 2010 and 262 / 2011 (22 August 2012) [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...challenge affidavit evidence. Complaint that the Practitioner had incorrectly informed a witness, MK, that he was not required for cross-examination. [46] The background is that MK had been asked to be available for cross- examination. The request had been made by or on behalf of the Applicant. Subsequently, MK was informed he was not required for cross-examination, and at the time of the hearing it appears that MK was out of the country. [47] The Applicant referred to his l...

10. Kennedy v Real Estate Agent Authority (CAC 403) & Lonergan [2016] NZREADT 81 [pdf, 186 KB]

    ...Kennedy received virtually no correspondence or information about marketing of the property from the licensee between January 2013 and January 2014. (ii) Complaint 9: That Mr Lonergan compromised Ms Kennedy’s security and insurance cover by requesting the T’s to leave the key inside a small fireplace on the property where it could be accessed by unauthorised persons. (iii) Complaint 12: That licensee Lonergan made comments about the complainant which were defamatory and ther...