Search Results

1. Wellington Standards Committee v Hall [2012] NZLCDT 7 [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...legal opinion on the consequences should the deal fall through. He also asked Trustees for authority to obtain a valuation and to discuss funding with the Trust’s rural manager.” 9 [20] It was subsequently resolved that Mr Jensen should be requested to attend the meeting. [21] On 30 November 2006 Mr Jensen wrote to Tauhara 15 advising that the only written material he had seen was a letter written by Ms Hall dated 22 November. That letter is found at page 111 of the Bund...

2. [2021] NZREADT 10 - Baker (9 March 2021) [pdf, 399 KB]

   ...appellants say that those indications were all well above $500,000 (averaging ($560,000). They considered that the marketing report confirmed their view that Mr Drumm was not acting in their best interests. [24] Mr Baker signed a Reserve Price form, stating a reserve of $590,000. However, as there were no registered bidders, the auction was re-scheduled for 21 December. [25] The on-line marketing of the property was altered to correct the RV figure. The appellants provided a p...

3. ENVC Matiatia party corresp costs Brabant WML liquidation 20160203 [pdf, 52 KB]

   Before the Environment Court at Auckland ENV-2013-AKL-000174 In the Matter of the Resource Management Act 1991 And In the Matter of Notice of Motion under Section 87G requesting the granting of resource consents to Waiheke Marinas Limited to establish a Marina at Matiatia Bay, Waiheke Island, in the Hauraki Gulf Memorandum of R Brabant and J Brabant with respect to Waiheke Marinas Limited (In Liquidation) Dated 3 February 2016

4. DT form 8 - request to enforce part of an agreed settlement [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   For more information visit www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals Disputes Tribunal Z Page 1 For more information visit www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals DT 07/11 - 8 What is this form for? Use this form if you wish to have enforced a term of an agreed settlement that has not been complied with. Completing and 1. Fill in all sections below. this form submitting 2. Print in caPiTal leTTers. 3. check, before submitting this form, that it is complete and that you have signed and dated it....

5. LCRO 74/2017 SD v TM (31 January 2019) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...decision by the [Area] Standards Committee (the Committee) which made a finding of unsatisfactory conduct against Mr TM, at the relevant time a lawyer and a partner with [Law Firm], [City]. [2] In August 1996, Mr SD and his business partner, Mr RN, formed [Company] (the company) in respect of which they were both shareholders and directors.1 [3] Eighteen years later, in November 2014, Mr SD wished to leave the company. He and Mr RN proposed that he would sell his shares in the comp...

6. West v Accident Compensation Corporation (Vocational independence) [2024] NZACC 138 [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...April 2020, Ms West stood up from her chair in the garage and fell over onto the concrete floor, and hit her left knee and head, resulting in a centimetre-long cut above her right eye. [7] On 7 April 2020, Dr Adrian Pett, GP, filed an ACC injury claim form for Ms West for an open wound of the forehead and a left knee abrasion on 6 April 2020. The claim was automatically accepted that day. [8] On 24 April 2020, Dr Tariq Ali, GP referred Ms West to Concussion Services, with on...

7. [2007] NZEmpC WC 21/07 Electrotech Controls Ltd v Rarere [pdf, 45 KB]

   ...rationale in Varney in the following way: “If the old employment legitimately ends why, in the absence of written terms, should the new employment be on the same terms as the old?” He submitted that such a rule prevents the parties from freely forming a new oral contract of service with basic terms of wages and hours and rights and obligations imposed by common law and statutes. In any event, he submitted that Varney could be distinguished and that the reasoning in Auto-Moveme...

8. IJ v SO LCRO 76 / 2011 (15 February 2012) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...The Applicant’s main ground for seeking a review of the Standards Committee decision surrounded the complaint of conflict of interest, from which the other complaints arose. [18] An Applicant-only hearing was conducted in January 2012 at the request of the Applicant who wished to be personally heard. He had been informed that the matter could be determined on the papers, but exercised his right to be heard and was at liberty to do so. The Practitioner was not required to atten...

9. Kozlov v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 416) and Hall & Lindsay [2018] NZREADT 38 [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...clear in her marketing that she was relying on material supplied by the vendor, and advertised the property in good faith. The Committee found that in so doing, she did not misrepresent the property.2 [11] The Committee further noted, from information obtained during the course of the investigation, that a window had indeed been provided for in the working drawings, but not installed. The Committee observed that monetary compensation had been paid by the developer/vendor to Mr Ko...

10. [2021] NZACC 116 – Muir v ACC (3 August 2021) [pdf, 236 KB]

    ...Compensation Act 2001] ____________________________________________________________________ [1] This is an appeal against a review decision dated 30 September 2019. [2] The Reviewer quashed ACC’s decision of 24 January 2019 declining the appellant’s request for pain management funding and the decision of 10 April 2019 declining the appellant’s request for cover for complex regional pain syndrome/neuropraxia. [3] In quashing these decisions, the Reviewer made the follo...