Search Results

1. [2009] NZEmpC CC 1/09 Murray v Godley House Limited [pdf, 33 KB]

   ...amount of that further contribution. I will then make an order as to costs. If Mr Murray is not liable for any further contribution to his costs, there will be no order for costs in this proceeding. [29] Mr Marsh concluded his submissions with a request that I fix the amount of costs I would have awarded had Mr Murray not been legally aided. Without knowing what costs have actually been incurred by Godley House Ltd, and in the absence of the information necessary to assess whet...

2. TW v NH LCRO 226 / 2011 (21 February 2013) [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...the date of the settlement of his entitlement. TW is correct in stating that the income of the estate up to the date of the valuation and settlement of the life interest and remainder as between NH and NF was payable to the estate and did not form part of the remainder to which NH was entitled. [27] Accordingly I accept that at the time of the valuation of the life interest the value of the life interest was 1/3 of $964,253.99 (namely $321,417.99 and not the $327,685.41 which was u...

3. Uia v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 104 (01 October 2014) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...circumstances are set out fully in that decision (which can be located on the Ministry of Justice website: www.justice.govt.nz). [2] In summary the circumstances giving rise to the complaint were: [2.1] The complainant engaged Ms Tangilanu to assist with a request for a visa; she was in New Zealand without a current visa. She sought the adviser’s assistance to get a work visa. [2.2] The complaint was that Ms Tangilanu had a written agreement, which did not set out the services she w...

4. Selwyn v Whakatōhea Māori Trust Board - Opape 1A19B (2019) 220 Waiariki MB 94 (220 WAR 94) [pdf, 322 KB]

   ...basis.6 In addition, Mr Selwyn contended that he had undertaken an investigation of the former trusteeship and this contributed to the delay. Even so, in the circumstances, he did not think that the delay was unreasonable. [11] Further, Mr Selwyn requested that the Court make a “determination” to “identify exactly who the owners are of this block.” He confirmed that he had discussed the issue with Court staff who stated that there were 155 individual owners of the land and...

5. [2020] NZIACDT 52 - TBE v Proudman (4 December 2020) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...TBE v Proudman [2020] NZIACDT 41. 3 [9] In the meantime, on 19 July 2018, Immigration New Zealand declined the daughter’s dependent student visa as she did not meet the age requirement of the instructions.2 [10] There followed numerous requests by the complainant for updates on the progress of his daughter’s visa application. Ms Proudman did not advise him of the decision until 21 September 2018. Decision of the Tribunal [11] The Tribunal noted Ms Proudman’s admi...

6. HES v Parekh [2019] NZIACDT 47 sanctions (19 July 2019) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...Immigration New Zealand declined the visitor visa application on 28 February 2016, because the couple had not met in person and had not satisfied the immigration requirements for a culturally arranged marriage. [8] On 13 April 2016, Ms Parekh requested Immigration New Zealand to review the decline decision. It replied on 23 April 2016 declining a review, since the couple had not met each other, a minimum requirement of the criteria.

7. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Fendall [2018] NZLCDT 32 [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...a significantly more serious nature. Decision to Strike Off [20] We note that a further purpose of penalty, which is not referred to in the summary from Daniels,11 is the principle of deterrence, both general and specific. This purpose also forms part of the “protection of the public” focus which is a key element of the Tribunal’s statutory obligations. Although it is often quoted, the passage in Bolton,12 best describes the importance of these concepts: “The second purp...

8. [2021] NZEmpC 231 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v JDFOODS Ltd [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...cent of the company’s shares. [6] The Labour Inspector considers that JDFOODS breached the Employment Relations Act 2000, the Wages Protection Act 1983, the Minimum Wages Act 1983 and the Holidays Act 2003. She says $57,249.93 is owed to three former employees. The Labour Inspector considers that Deepti and Jayant Kaushal are persons involved in breaches committed by JDFOODS. She accordingly filed a statement of problem with regard to those matters in the Employment Relations...

9. [2021] NZACC 192 - Beban v ACC (2 December 2021) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...recorded that Ms Beban was doing well and that he was very happy with her progress. [7] There was then further surgery to remove instrumentation in February 2015. Physiotherapy was funded following the second surgery. In March 2015, there was a request for attendant care. On 20 April 2015, Mr Somerville reported that Ms Beban had been given a “clean bill of health”, looked much better and was on the improve, although she had some discomfort in her left leg and low back....

10. Application-to-provide-legal-aid-ServicesV21.8.pdf [pdf, 1.4 MB]

    ...bank account and GST number, if we don’t already have them. You must also provide a copy of a bank deposit slip or similar proof of bank account including bank logo, account name and account number. 8 Bank account number 9 GST number Demographic information This information is collected solely for the purposes of monitoring the age distribution of the provider pool for planning purposes. It will not be used for any other purposes. Answering this question is optional. 10 Date of birth d...