Search Results

Search results for claim form.

10917 items matching your search terms

  1. Nelson Standards Committee v Webb [2011] NZLCDT 13 [pdf, 114 KB]

    ...to a client3 that the “house-sitters” who were to benefit from rent free accommodation, and whom Mr Webb had arranged to place in a property owned by an estate being administered by that client, were in fact his parents. [3] The Tribunal requested written submissions on penalty and costs. Both parties have now provided those and have also confirmed that they wish the matters to be dealt with on the papers. [4] Mr Webb had been granted interim name suppression until the subs...

  2. Wellington Standards Committee v McGuire [2011] NZLCDT 28 [pdf, 94 KB]

    ...wasn’t for the want of trying on Mr McGuire’s part, and, in the absence of an authority from the Legal Services Agency, there was an attempt to secure a payment of fees that would have been in breach of section 66. That was the misconduct which formed the essence of the original charge Mr Sainsbury submitted. 9. Mr Sainsbury, while noting that the charge was not intended to be directed at the actual taking of fees, its essence being Mr McGuire’s conduct in trying to faci...

  3. Toilolo v Letalu [2014] NZIACDT 52 (15 April 2014) [pdf, 129 KB]

    ...Registrar identified material that supports the following grounds of complaint: [4.1] The adviser was negligent. [4.2] The adviser engaged in dishonest or misleading behaviour, by giving a false account to the complainant of the immigration work he performed. [4.3] The adviser breached the Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2010 (the Code) as: [4.3.1] He breached the client engagement requirements in clauses 1.5(a), (b) and (d) of the Code. [4.3.2] He breached his duties of care...

  4. Harawira - Te Tii A Māori Reservation (Waitangi Marae) (2018) 173 Taitokerau MB 245 (173 TTK 245) [pdf, 287 KB]

    ...the Ngāti Rahiri Māori Committee. She paid $700.00 into the Marae bank account as a deposit for the booking. She contends their booking was not accepted and the deposit has not been refunded. [16] Mr Taituha states they received the booking request but the proposed date clashed with an existing booking. He states 8 bikes were stored at the Marae from the Weet-Bix Kids TRYathlon, Ms Harawira used the bikes but did not return them. Mr Taituha argues the bikes have to be returne...

  5. Singh v the Registrar of Immigration Advisers [2016] NZIACDT 25 (17 May 2016) [pdf, 140 KB]

    ...appeal beyond deciding it 6 should hear the complaint. The Tribunal is very conscious that it has not heard the adviser’s case, and will ensure he has a proper opportunity to present his response to the Tribunal. [32] The Tribunal requests that the Registrar provide a copy of this decision, and the documents filed in this appeal to the adviser so he has access to all the material the Tribunal has seen. That material will also be included in the statement of complaint to en...

  6. Stanley v Committee of Management for Maraeroa C Inc. - Maraeroa C Inc. (2021) 217 Waikato Maniapoto MB 242 (217 WMN 242) [pdf, 241 KB]

    ...interim injunction and therefore focussed on the grounds to grant leave to appeal per s 59. It did not squarely address whether an interim injunction is a provisional or preliminary determination. [20] An interim injunction is, by definition, a form of relief that is made pending the disposal of substantive proceedings. It is also a determination of law, which ordinarily requires a determination of fact. Importantly, however, an interim injunction is not usually provisional or p...

  7. McMaster v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 412) [2017] NZREADT 17 [pdf, 166 KB]

    ...explained that in the event that the purchase did not settle, the Agency would retain the full commission, and that there would be no refund of any part of it. He submitted that the listing agreement (which was not provided to the Committee, and not requested by the Committee) should have provided that the commission was payable on settlement, not on the sale and purchase agreement becoming unconditional. [14] Mr McMaster further submitted that Mr Allen and the Agency could not, in...

  8. LCRO 153/2017 ACE v BDF (28 September 2018) [pdf, 199 KB]

    ...dealt with seriously, and accorded due and full attention. [42] That is not achieved by referring the complaint to be dealt with by means of the Early Intervention Process, and that has been borne out by the responses from both parties to the requests for further information by this Office. Decision [43] With some reluctance, the determination of the Committee is reversed pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006.10 [44] Pursuant to s 209 of the Act, the Co...

  9. [2019] NZEnvC 108 Maehl v Lenihan [pdf, 8.3 MB]

    ...applicable. I was referred to various decisions including the Brook Valley decision including that in the Supreme Court [2019] NZSC 51 which upheld the Court of Appeal and High Court decisions. In that case the interest group was a community group formed for the purposes of advancing opposition to 1080. The same body has been the subject of decision of this Court in relation to 1080 drops for the Auckland water catchment. The criteria noted by the High Court, Church J, in that costs...

  10. LCRO 92/2021 AZ v BY (19 July 2021) [pdf, 134 KB]

    ...Deed. Instead of taking matters that arise from the interpretation of the Deed and the application of its terms based on that interpretation to Court for determination, Mr AZ raised his concerns with 2 the New Zealand Law Society (NZLS) in the form of a professional standards complaint made against Ms BY. The complaint and the Standards Committee decision [3] The Committee received a substantial amount of information from Mr AZ, much of which relates to steps Ms BY has taken...