Search Results

Search results for claim form.

10901 items matching your search terms

  1. SM v KN [2024] NZDT 176 (11 March 2024) [pdf, 190 KB]

    ...towing vehicle, hinges (where applicable) and the structural and other related components between the trailer coupling and the trailer bogi or chassis. He says that because there are separate definitions the chassis and drawbar are separate and perform separate functions. He says the chassis is structural and the drawbar reduces the load towards the towball. b) However, SM says that the draw bar is the part that connects the chassis to the tow vehicle. It is all one structure and is all...

  2. BN v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 292 (26 April 2024) [pdf, 189 KB]

    ...prior to purchasing [the horse], BN himself an experienced and established horseman within the equestrian industry, inspected and rode [the horse]. BN acknowledged from the trial ride that [the horse] was sound at the time and under BN’s hand performed what BN sought from him. BN turned down, against D Ltd’s recommendation, the getting of a veterinarian pre-purchase check. b. Furthermore, BN commented that prior to becoming lame, [the horse] had improved with his riding during this...

  3. UO Ltd & UI Ltd v BU & ND [2024] NZDT 528 (15 July 2024) [pdf, 94 KB]

    ...CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Referee: P McKinstry Date: 15 July 2024 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

  4. NC v UD Ltd [2024] NZDT 829 (2 October 2024) [pdf, 189 KB]

    ...Ltd [container number 1]. As NC has not provided any evidence of his ownership of this or any other container held by UD Ltd, the claim is dismissed. Referee: C Price Date: 2 October 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

  5. BOAC v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 50-57 [pdf, 357 KB]

    ...CONCLUSION AND ORDERS .................................................................... 58 CONCLUSION AS TO QUANTUM .............................................................. 58 Page | 4 [1] These proceedings concern nine individual claims which have been heard concurrently.1 The nine claimants each own a residential townhouse (unit) which is affected by leaky building issues. Remedial work has been completed. The nine claimants seek to recover the costs of remedi...

  6. [2018] NZEmpC 25 Sawyer v The Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington [pdf, 378 KB]

    ...employment. She seeks as remedies reinstatement and reimbursement of lost income, interest, and compensation under s 123(1)(c)(i) and (ii) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act). A penalty has also been sought and the Court is requested to make recommendations to the Vice-Chancellor under s 123(1)(ca) of the Act. [4] The shortcomings in the way in which the Vice-Chancellor is said to have treated Dr Sawyer, and which are intended to support her claim for personal...

  7. LCRO 276/2013+293/2013+242/2016 CS v VN, PR and ZW ZM v VC [pdf, 274 KB]

    ...early January 2009. At that stage settlement had not been reached and the complainants’ 2 proceeding had not concluded. The complainants refused to pay the $15,000 balance of Mr CS’ fees (the fees) and he resisted the complainants’ requests that he provide files to them or their new lawyer. [3] Acting on instructions from Mr DH, Mr CS commenced summary judgment proceedings seeking to recover the unpaid balance of Mr CS’ fees (the debt recovery proceeding).1 Mr CS s...

  8. [2020] NZIACDT 28 - XA v Hill (29 June 2020) [pdf, 208 KB]

    ...2 INTRODUCTION [1] Ms Jennifer Ann Hill, the adviser, used an unlicensed employee within her office, her life partner, Mr Gu, to engage with her client, Ms XA, the complainant. Furthermore, Ms Hill lacked diligence in permitting incorrect information regarding the complainant’s work experience to be provided to Immigration New Zealand. [2] The complaint was referred by the Registrar of Immigration Advisers (the Registrar) to the Tribunal. It was upheld in a decision issued o...

  9. Te Manutukutuku Issue 3 [pdf, 2.9 MB]

    ...generally. Common historical background to these claims, i.e. the Crown purchases in the 1850s and 1860s. - The different options for settling claims: hearings, nego­ tiation, mediation. - Presentation of mapping materials provided by the Maori Land Information Office and an explanation of their purpose in research. Department of Survey and Land Information and Maori Land Information staff will be present. The claims involved are: Whanganui 0 Orotu Claimants are Te Otane Reti a...

  10. TU v EM [2024] NZDT 153 (10 April 2024) [pdf, 103 KB]

    ...4. EM denied the claim saying that the baler was a functioning machine and was sold as a second hand machine. 5. The issues I have to consider are: a. Was there a misrepresentation that induced TU into the contract? b. When was the contract formed? c. Was there a breach of the contract regarding delivery of the baler? d. If there has been a misrepresentation or breach, what is the appropriate remedy? Was there a misrepresentation that induced TU into the contract? 6. Section...