Search Results

Search results for claim form.

10925 items matching your search terms

  1. [2007] NZEmpC AC 13/07 Red Beach School Board of Trustees & Ors v New Zealand Education Institute (Inc) [pdf, 135 KB]

    RED BEACH SCHOOL BOT & ANOR V NZEI (INC) AK AC 13/07 20 March 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 13/07 ARC 115/05 IN THE MATTER OF de novo challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN THE RED BEACH SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES First Plaintiff AND THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL IN RESPECT OF THE SECRETARY FOR EDUCATION Second Plaintiff AND THE NEW ZEALAND EDUCATION INSTITUTE (INC) Defendant Hearing: 26, 27 and 29 J

  2. [2015] NZEmpC 176 Lean Meats Oamaru Ltd v NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc [pdf, 222 KB]

    ...payment for rest breaks had been incorporated in 2007 in hourly and piece rates. [15] Bargaining again occurred for the purposes of the next CEA, which was intended to take effect from April 2011. The smoko clause was incorporated in its previous form. However, the CEA was unsigned because the parties were unable to agree to all aspects of it although the parties worked to it. [16] In 2012, the Union raised the matter of paid breaks with a Labour Inspector from the Ministry of...

  3. LCRO 43/2016 XZ v QW [pdf, 209 KB]

    ...XZ’s review application was accompanied by comprehensive documentation. Further submissions were filed prior to hearing. [19] Considered in its totality, the argument that permeates Ms XZ’s application is argument that she was not sufficiently informed as to the risks involved in the litigation or sufficiently informed as to the possibility of pursuing alternative options, that she was given unrealistic expectation as to possible outcomes, and not provided with accurate information...

  4. LCRO 234/2017 and 172/2018 YA and XB v WD and VS (9 April 2019) [pdf, 242 KB]

    ...Mr XB and Ms YA agreed to a change of track. A share broker, [RH], is mentioned in Ms WD’s timesheets. Mr XB and Ms YA did not have a Faster Identification Number, or FIN. Ms WD contacted TS, which is understood to be a share registry, to request a FIN. TS provided Ms WD with forms for the Executors to sign. The share sale process continued. [42] Ms WD’s timesheets record toing and froing between her, Mr XB, Ms YA, TS and [RH] in August, September, October, November and ear...

  5. INZ (Greathead) v Ortiz [2019] NZIACDT 59 (29 August 2019) [pdf, 154 KB]

    ...or misleading behaviour; and (e) a breach of the code of conduct. [51] The Tribunal hears those complaints which the Registrar decides to refer to the Tribunal.3 [52] The Tribunal must hear complaints on the papers, but may in its discretion request further information or any person to appear before the Tribunal.4 It has been established to deal relatively summarily with complaints referred to it.5 [53] After hearing a complaint, the Tribunal may dismiss it, uphold it but take no...

  6. LCRO 73/2020 A and B WT v CV and DU (29 September 2021) [pdf, 185 KB]

    ...was dated [Date] 2018. Settlement was to proceed on [Date] 2018. 2 [4] Mr and Mrs WT provided various documents to the real estate agent managing the sale, including a pre-contract disclosure statement (PCDS). They had noted on the PCDS form, “second half – external planned maintenance of the building $[amount]”. [5] Mr CV’s firm (practising under the name and style of [Lawfirm 1] Ltd – (“LF1]”) was instructed by Mr and Mrs WT to act on the sale. [6] At the time...

  7. [2022] NZACC 56 – Ajayi v ACC (5 April 2022) [pdf, 214 KB]

    ...cover for this injury, and approved funding for a physiotherapy consultation. [4] On 10 March 2016, Mr Ajayi was playing football when he was kicked in the ankle. On 13 April 2016, his treating physiotherapist, Craig Leong, lodged an injury claim form on behalf of Mr Ajayi, seeking cover from the Corporation of a right ankle sprain. On 14 April 2016, the Corporation accepted cover of Mr Ajayi’s right ankle sprain. [5] On 19 April 2016, an x-ray of Mr Ajayi’s right ankle wa...

  8. Waitangi Tribunal - Initiation Consultation and Consent [pdf, 1.4 MB]

    ...t W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 6 W A I 2 4 7 8 I n I t I a t I o n, C o n s u l t a t I o n, a n d C o n s e n t Chapter 3 of Report into Claims concerning Proposed Reforms to Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 P r e - p u b l i c a t i o n V e r s i o n typeset 2016 by the Waitangi tribunal, Wellington, new Zealand set in adobe Minion Pro and Cronos Pro opticals...

  9. LCRO 24/2023 RD v KE and PS (5 September 2023) [pdf, 329 KB]

    ...6 [38] RD then instructed Mr TZ of [Law firm B] to pursue enquiries on his behalf with [Law firm C]. On 23 February 2021, that firm wrote to Mr KE by email attaching a copy of the 2017 codicil and of the trust deed for the D Family Trust and requesting a copy of all files held by [Law firm C] relating to the affairs of the late BD in electronic form if possible. It seems there were further, unspecified “follow ups” from [Law firm B]. [39] Mr KE did not respond either to the l

  10. Hingston v Hiroti [2016] Chief Judge's MB 672 (2016 CJ 672) [pdf, 316 KB]

    ...Maryanne Hori-Kauhemotu to Stanley Bernard Eruini Hiroti; e. A copy of an unsigned letter dated 23 August 2010 from Maryanne Kauhemotu to Stanley Bernard Eruini Hiroti; f. A letter from the Māori Land Court dated 29 September 2010 to the applicant requesting a certified copy of the Death Certificate for the deceased; g. A copy of the Court minute and orders complained of (108 Aotea MB 247-248 dated 1 October 2001); h. A copy of a Court minute made at 111 Aotea MB 52 dated 12 De...