LCRO 134/2019 NM v LL (23 October 2020) [pdf, 207 KB]
...filed by Ms JG on 31 May 2017, Ms LL informed the Tribunal on 6 June 2017 she “accept[ed]” Ms JG had been instructed to act for three of the four claimants, but Mr BT wanted [Ms LL] to continue to act for him. [8] On 7 June 2017, Mr NM requested (by email) Ms LL to “forward all [her] records relating to the claim”. [9] Ms LL’s practice manager responded (by email) to Mr NM on 14 July 2017 explaining that because Ms LL had acted for the claimants since 200[8] she needed...