11435 items matching your search terms
...is to pay Mr NU the sum of $590.58. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 5 Referee: K Johnson Date: 19 December 2023 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...
...to her. 2. NM and TX claim $4,999.00 from KC for her contribution, saying completion of the fence cost them in excess of $12,500.00. In claiming this sum they acknowledge there was no agreement for KC to pay this specific sum, but the claim form required them to nominate a sum, and they say this represents a fair contribution in all the circumstances. 3. This matter was heard before me by teleconference on Friday 11 October 2024 at 2pm. KC previously provided written submission...
...evidence at the hearing on 10 February 2025. NN advised at the hearing that SF is his uncle and that [Engine Rebuilding Service] is owned by SF’s son, NN’s cousin. 13. There is extensive technical evidence before the Tribunal, both in the form of written reports, technical data and of photographs, as well as the above-mentioned oral evidence from SF. I will not attempt to repeat or summarise all of this evidence in this order. I note that this was clearly a complicated job, where...
...is reference to an ACC claim number in the invoices for medical costs) and therefore s 317 prevents him from bringing his claim for medical expenses. Referee: R Merrett Date: 12 October 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...
...jurisdiction to hear the claim. Accordingly, the claim is struck out. Referee: DTR Fuli Date: 19 March 2024 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...
...CONCLUSION AND ORDERS .................................................................... 58 CONCLUSION AS TO QUANTUM .............................................................. 58 Page | 4 [1] These proceedings concern nine individual claims which have been heard concurrently.1 The nine claimants each own a residential townhouse (unit) which is affected by leaky building issues. Remedial work has been completed. The nine claimants seek to recover the costs of remedi...
...the beginning of 2000 was an independent contractor and billed the defendant for his services through a limited liability company. In May 2002, that person changed his status to employee, went onto salary and signed the appropriate taxation forms. [17] None of the matters that the plaintiff claims were agreed with Mr Currie were reduced to writing in either correspondence or in the form of a contract of service. However, it does appear that from the end of 1999, the plaintiff...
...appointed to analyse the wage and time records was discussed. However, this never occurred. f) The plaintiff, frustrated with the lack of progress as to an independent review of the outstanding issues or otherwise, instructed Ms Dodunski to request that the outstanding issues be brought on for consideration at an investigation meeting. A second investigation meeting was accordingly scheduled for 17 May 2018. g) At the commencement of that meeting, Ms Dodunski made an oral app...
...and place. Did OU meet its duty of care by maintaining this section of road within the tolerances of its roading maintenance contract with GI? 17. The roading maintenance contract stipulates maximum tolerances for various types of road deformations / defects (shunts, heaves, potholes, etc). 18. The contract also obliges GI to carry out road inspections. 19. Mr L explained that GI carries out an annual ‘road truck test’ in addition to more frequent visual inspections.
...remedial work. It must have arisen within two years and have been carried out during that two years so that the costs are incurred during that two-year period. 12. Therefore, it is necessary to look at the evidence of the costs incurred by B in performing remedial work. What amount is payable and by whom? 13. B presented evidence of $10,025.00 of remedial work as reviewed by Dr L. Dr L is an independent clinician and he reviewed the records for each patient, including radiolog...