Search Results

1. [2014] NZEmpC 152 Davis v Commissioner of Police [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...and the Inspector had decided, following further inquiries, that there was simply no evidence to show that the Senior Constable had abused his position in relation to the cell incidents. The inquiry was not to be taken further. Mr Davis was informed of this at a meeting on 3 September 2009. He reacted badly, telling the Senior Sergeant that he was wrong and accusing him and the Inspector of sweeping the matter under the carpet and conducting a cover-up. He indicated that he no l...

2. Newel [2013] NZWHT Auckland 19 [pdf, 79 KB]

   ...“built”. [7] Lang J also considered the effect of s 43(1) of the Building Act 1991 which provides as follows: 43 Code compliance certificate (1) An owner shall as soon as practicable advise the territorial authority, in the prescribed form, that the building work has been completed to the extent required by the building consent issued in respect of that building work. [8] He concluded that if this reasoning is applied to the consideration of the built- by...

3. CJ v XL LCRO 221 / 2010 (1 July 2011) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...the business was made available to ABF through ABE. The agreement between the parties was that the gross profits were to be shared equally between ABE and ABF. [3] ABF failed to account to ABE for any of the profits, and when pressed, counter- claimed. Part of the counter-claim related to goods which ABF had acquired at the direction of ABE to supply to a customer, but that supply contract did not eventuate. 2 [4] Proceedings requiring ABF to account for its profits and for a...

4. Taylor v Corrections (Jurisdiction) [2019] NZHRRT 17 [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...grounds it contained passages which could reasonably be construed as threats or attempts to intimidate the then Prison Manager, a former prisoner and police officers in the Hastings area. [2] On discovering the letter had been intercepted Mr Taylor requested that it be returned to him or that he be provided with a copy. His request was refused. [3] Mr Taylor thereupon made a complaint to the Privacy Commissioner alleging a breach of IPP 6 which, subject to certain exceptions, provides...

5. Waitangi Tribunal - Strategic direction 2014 to 2025 [pdf, 16 MB]

   ...means comprehensively tackling all claims before us and those yet to be filed. To that end, we have adopted a long-term strategic framework that sets out the main components of the Tribunal’s future inquiry programme. This includes both established forms of inquiry, such as the district inquiries under way, and innovative, new pathways to deal with remaining historical claims, kaupapa claims, and contemporary claims. Achieving the strategic goals outlined in this document will enable the...

6. Waitangi Tribunal - 2014 to 2025 strategic direction [pdf, 16 MB]

   ...means comprehensively tackling all claims before us and those yet to be filed. To that end, we have adopted a long-term strategic framework that sets out the main components of the Tribunal’s future inquiry programme. This includes both established forms of inquiry, such as the district inquiries under way, and innovative, new pathways to deal with remaining historical claims, kaupapa claims, and contemporary claims. Achieving the strategic goals outlined in this document will enable the...

7. Wynyard v Waata - Manawakore C1 and Manawakore D (Pa Te Aroha Marae) (2019) 205 Taitokerau MB 207 (205 TTK 207) [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...be conducted? (b) If so, into what issues? (c) What orders or directions should be granted. Background [4] Pa Te Aroha Marae is a Māori reservation located in Whirinaki, within the Hokianga. The reservation comprises of 1.2165 hectares, formed over two blocks of Māori freehold land, Manawakore C1 and Manawakore D. Manawakore C1 is 0.1618 hectares and was set aside as a Māori Reservation on 1 August 1957 and Manawakore D is 1.0547 hectares and was set aside as a Māori R...

8. Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited [pdf, 45 KB]

   ...comply with an order for discovery, a notice for further particulars, a notice for interrogatories, or other similar requirement under these rules; or (v) failing, without reasonable justification, to accept an offer of settlement whether in the form of an offer under rule 14.10 or some other offer to settle or dispose of the proceeding; … 24. The claimant states that items (i), (ii) and (iii) above cover the Council’s behaviour in question. 25. The claimant also refer...

9. FP v UW LCRO 225 / 2010 (11 October 2011) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...These included: the facts the issues potential causes of action strategy costs. [30] UV made a file note of the content of that discussion which UW referred to at the hearing. A copy of that file note was provided to me at my request following the hearing. The file note is in UV’s handwriting and it is apparent that it was made as the discussion proceeded, as the content is in some cases abbreviated. Nevertheless the file note is a useful record of what was dis...

10. [2012] NZEmpC 137 Glenmavis Farm Partnership (2007) v Todd [pdf, 163 KB]

    ...response to a letter from solicitors setting out Mr Todd’s several concerns about the state of the employment relationship between the parties. These included his concern that there was no executed employment agreement. It addressed also his request for certainty and peace of mind about the land that he had purchased but which was the subject of a registered mortgage securing the loan. Dr Walker and Mr Budge took time to consider their position after receipt of the lawyer’s...