Search Results

1. Ruapehu District Council - Ohura South A3E2C3B2A Block XIII Tuhua Survey District (2014) 321 Aotea MB 95 (321 AOT 95) [pdf, 123 KB]

   ...was due. That said, counsel conceded that in that affidavit Mr Lei only produced the latest rates invoice and that invoices for each of the rating years should have been produced but were not. Even so, Mr Bhullar points out that the actual information as required was produced in the form of Mr Lei’s letter of 25 July 2013. Counsel also emphasised that the evidence of Mr Lei was unchallenged and the council was therefore entitled to collect the rates and be granted a charging orde...

2. BORA Patents (Trans-Tasman Patent Attorneys and Other Matters) Amendment Bill [pdf, 336 KB]

   ...17 5. Section 17 of the Bill of Rights Act affirms that everyone has the right to freedom of association. This right includes not only a right to establish and enter into association with others, but also a right not to be compelled to join or form an association with an organisation. 6. Part 6 of the Bill gives effect to the joint registration regime for patent attorneys in New Zealand and Australia. Under sections 270 and 271 of Part 6 of the Bill, patent attorneys are requir...

3. [2016] NZSSAA 73 (18 July 2016) [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...appellant has been travelling to Masterton approximately once every three weeks, he does not make that visit on a Monday so that he can attend the group. He prefers to go to Masterton on the day his benefit is paid. [7] The appellant says his request is supported by the certificate from Dr Smith and letters from his psychologist Dr Fran Lowe dated 24 September 2013 and 12 October 2015. [8] The Ministry submit that there are inconsistencies in the letters from Dr Lowe which ga...

4. Kaufusi v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 54 (24 April 2014) [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...appeal to the Immigration and Protection Tribunal. [2] The grounds of complaint are in essence that the adviser: [2.1] Failed to undertake the compulsory steps for client engagement, but took fees; [2.2] Did not carry out the work she agreed to perform; and [2.3] Failed to refund the fees she had not earned. [3] The adviser has not challenged the statement of complaint, which set out these grounds of complaint. The Tribunal’s decision is that the material before it requires that...

5. Notes of Crown Maori Relations focus group Aotea and Porirua College 14 May 2018 [pdf, 426 KB]

   ...Project leader Ahurea Tuakiri o te Tangata Whenua, Aotea College Tamara Nash - Project leader Ahurea Tuakiri o te Tangata Whenua Marley Robben – Kaiarahi, Aotea College Angela von Dadelszen, Teacher / Kaiako, Senior Leadership Team, Head of Performing Arts, Aotea College Apologies: Murray Faivalu - Head Boy, Porirua College Dante Collier – Prefect, Porirua College Secretariat: Benesia Smith, Specialist Advisor, Crown/Māori Relations Unit, Ministry of Justice Hollie Sm...

6. Schedule 1 to The Hon Ian Callinan AC’s Report [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...November 2008 Judgment 15. Bain 8 September 2008 Judgment 16. Bain 29 September 2008 District Court ruling 17. R v Bain 17 October 2008 Judgment 18. Bain 8 December 2008 Judgment 19. CA amended decision 30 January 2009 20. Police report form attachment – Exhibit 1 timeline 21. Bain 13 November amended judgment 22. R v Bain 3 13 November 2008 2 nd amended judgment 23. Redacted CA decision re suppression 24. SC 13 2009 Bain v the Queen recall 25 May 2009 25. R v Bain...

7. MVDT Annual Report 2012-2013 (Wellington) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...Act 1970. These omissions both appear to be drafting errors. (c) Costs and/or powers to require information/witness attendance The tribunal has an inquisitorial function. The current practise is to review documentation prior to a hearing and request parties to provide particular information and/or arrange for particular witnesses to attend the hearing. The tribunal has no statutory power to require information or to require witnesses to attend. It is not unusual for parties to tu...

8. Family Court Rewrite Submission - Roger Payne [pdf, 116 KB]

   ...Grandparents is required . Lawyers and judges have had too much say in past Reviews . It is high time to allow wider knowledge to prevail . CASE STUDIES 4. In your Overview to the on-line January 2019 consultation document ( Third Subheading : Information about Third Parties ) you report that the case study approach to better management has not been allowed on grounds of privacy under the founding Family Court Act 1980 . This is the first time I have seen a Family Court Review provi...

9. 2017-NZEnvC-048 Okura Holdings Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...introducing new parties would might have on progressing the appeal to resolution. [21] In this case the parties in opposition to the waiver have acknowledged that they will not be unduly prejudiced if the waiver is granted. Instead they have requested that the Court exercise its discretion and decline the waiver on its merits. [22] In considering the application on the merits, the Court is satisfied that WDLP is not a trade competitor. WDLP's interest is focussed on the modelli...

10. [2024] NZEmpC 67 Roberts v The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 191 KB]

    ...strike out. Accordingly, he submits that costs in relation to that conference sit properly within this matter as 2 “Employment Court of New Zealand Practice Directions” <www.employmentcourt.govt.nz> at No 18. opposed to forming part of any costs consideration for the substantive proceeding in the future. [9] The defendant submits that any costs in relation to the directions conference should await the conclusion of the proceedings as a whole. In the altern...