Search Results

1. DX v OI Ltd [2019] NZDT 1529 (24 October 2019) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...service vehicle must record the name, address, and contact telephone number of the person who requested that the tow be undertaken”. If the requirements of Rule 5.9 are not met, the vehicle may not be towed. 8. OI produced a copy of a tow authority form naming “Police/NRA” as the person authorising the tow and “PO34427162” as the order number. OI’s director SC gave evidence that this was the police event number, and that standard practice is to work off the event number rathe...

2. Deliu v New Zealand Law Society [2012] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...The allegations made against Randerson J [10] In the separate “Bundle of Documents – Randerson J complaint by F Deliu” there is a letter dated 27 May 2010 from Mr Deliu to the Judicial Conduct Commissioner. It opens: I write to lodge a formal complaint against Justice Randerson. The essential grounds of my complaint are that his Honour has: 1. Defamed me to the President of the New Zealand Law Society; 2. Refused to apologize to a fellow court officer as a duty of respect wo...

3. Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...liability or in turn seek indemnity from others. PRELIMINARY ISSUES The Parties First and Tenth Respondents - Woodward Shelf Company No. 1 Limited and Mr Hayim Nachum [3] The first respondent, Woodward Shelf Company No 1 Limited, formerly Boulcott Investments Group Limited, previously known as Parklane Investments Limited (Parklane) was the previous owner and developer of the site on which the property is situated. Parklane took part in some of these proceedings,...

4. Smith v Waitakere City Council [pdf, 220 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 00277 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN SEAN SMITH Claimant AND WAITAKERE CITY COUNCIL First respondent (Intituling continued next page) Hearing: 30 May & 1 June 2004 Appearances: Sean Smith in person as Claimant Susan Banbury & Georgina Grant for First Respondent Lawrence Ponniah for Second and Fourth Respondents Determination: 12 July 2004...

5. LCRO 192/2017 KY v QW, Official Assignee (27 September 2019) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...apologised. [26] He says upon Mr GC’s subsequent retirement as a partner, and the Official Assignee later “becoming aware of the missing files/transactional information”, those responsibilities fell to him. He says he provided the information requested to the Official Assignee upon discovering Mr GC had not done so. (2) Application of funds received [27] Mr KY submits that following the demand made by the barrister in August 2013 for payment of outstanding fees, his “in...

6. Directory of Official Information 2019 S-U [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   Directory of Official Information Listings S-U About This is a living document; we endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz Ministerial Services Strategy, Governance & Finance mailto:official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz mailto:off

7. [2014] NZEmpc 85 McCartney v Atlas Concrete Ltd and First Union [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...rules?”. [3] The starting point is, therefore, the relevant rules of the Union at the time it declined to continue to represent Mr McCartney in the matter of his personal grievance with his former employer. [4] Mr Cranney has, at the Court’s request, supplied certified copies of the Union’s rules for the years 2007 and 2008. Those were then the rules of the National Distribution Union Inc (NDU) but the fact that the rights and obligations in law of the NDU have been assumed...

8. [2021] NZACC 28 - Williams v ACC (4 February 2021) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...appellant’s covered injury was not established. [2] The issue on this appeal is whether this decision was correct. Background [3] The appellant sustained an injury to his right foot on 28 September 2018 when, as described in an ACR45 form submitted to the Corporation, the fork of a forklift dropped onto his right foot. [4] On 28 September 2018, the appellant who then was 26, presented at the emergency department of Dunedin Hospital with a crush injury to his right fo...

9. O'Hagan v Police [2020] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 827 KB]

   ...can start working through this information. The Police response [11] In terms of PA, s 40(1) the Police had until Friday 29 May 2015 to decide whether the request was to be granted and to notify Mr O’Hagan of that decision: 40 Decisions on requests (1) Subject to this Act, the agency to which an information privacy request is made or transferred in accordance with this Act shall, as soon as reasonably practicable, and in any case not later than 20 working days after the day on...

10. Dooley v Canterbury District Health Board (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 34 [pdf, 167 KB]

    ...Commissioner [2] In 2015 Mr Dooley alleged the South Canterbury District Health Board (SCDHB) had not supplied him with all the information to which he was entitled and had not responded to his request for correction of his information. Mr Dooley had also requested the SCDHB to delete his information from its electronic system and to surrender to him all hard copy records of his medical information. On a complaint being made by Mr Dooley the Privacy Commissioner in 2015 investigated a...