Search Results

1. HRRT Statement of reply [pdf, 386 KB]

   For more information visit www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals The Human Rights Review Tribunal Page 1 For more information visit www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals HRRT 06/09 - 4 Office use only: HRRT NoStatement of Reply What is this form for? Use this form if you are a named as a defendant in a ‘Statement of Claim’ and wish to file a ‘Statement of Reply’ in response to the allegations made against you. Important Information 1. Please print in CAPITAL LETTERS 2. It is important tha...

2. NG & OG v JS [2024] NZDT 33 (18 January 2024) [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...their claim to the required standard. If an applicant fails to do that, then the claim must be dismissed whether it has merit or not. When assessing whether the onus of proof has been discharged by a party, the Tribunal considers and evaluates the information and evidence presented by the parties. I would like to reassure the parties that all information and evidence presented to the Tribunal has been considered, but this order refers only to essential material and is not intended to be a...

3. Turkmani v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2024] NZACC 127 (24 July 2024) [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...report to ACC 14/04/2016 a way forward would be for the client to be referred by his GP to him at Christchurch Public Hospital for further management. 6 [17] On 7 May 2017, Mr Dalzell completed an Assessment Report and Treatment Plan (ARTP) requesting the Corporation to fund an instrumented decompression and fusion procedure at the L4/5 level. The diagnosis was a pars defect at L4/5. As to the causal link between the proposed treatment and the covered injury, Mr Dalzell said...

4. Harris v Department of Corrections [2013] NZHRRT 15 [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...TRIBUNAL ON THE MERITS 2 Introduction [1] Mr Harris alleges that on a date unknown at a café in Albany near Auckland Prison, the Department of Corrections (Corrections) lost documents from his file and thereby disclosed personal information in breach of information privacy Principle 11. The issue in this case is whether the evidence establishes that such breach occurred. Non-publication orders [2] At the commencement of the hearing on 3 April 2013 Ms Reddy for Correc...

5. EI v TB [2020] NZDT 401 (19 March 2020) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...amount claimed? [16] Having made the findings in paragraph [14], I also find that EI is not liable to pay the amount claimed. I therefore dismiss TB’s claim. Referee: P Ferguson Date: 19 March 2020 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

6. EI v TB [2020] NZDT 1699 (19 March 2020) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...amount claimed? [16] Having made the findings in paragraph [14], I also find that EI is not liable to pay the amount claimed. I therefore dismiss TB’s claim. Referee: P Ferguson Date: 19 March 2020 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

7. OO v SL [2024] NZDT 196 (19 January 2024) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...sum of $3,995.92 ($4,830.00 - $834.08 reparation). Referee: DTR Unasa Date: 19 January 2024 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

8. U Ltd v J Ltd [2024] NZDT 762 (11 December 2024) [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...was of the same kind throughout the house, and J Ltd had applied an excess to each room when, if one room CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 only had been damaged, it would have been obliged to replace the entire carpet in order to ensure uniformity. It was impossible for U Ltd to establish details of how and when these events occurred, and equally impossible to pinpoint how other items of damage, including thefts, had occurred. [7] QC said that: - cl 3 of the policy stated that...

9. Khan v Khetarpal [2015] NZIACDT 45 (24 April 2015) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...reply. The due date was Thursday 11 December 2014; she was given extensions of time through to 30 January 2015. She claimed on 17 April 2015 she had not responded due to “pressing personal commitments”, despite the Tribunal allowing the time she requested earlier; and she sought an extension to 27 April 2015. [12] The Tribunal declines the complainant’s request: [12.1] She has repeatedly failed to comply with deadlines. [12.2] She no longer supports the complaint, and accordingly...

10. KX v XM & others [2024] NZDT 869 (6 December 2024) [pdf, 166 KB]

    ...items have been fixed, and he notes where something has been fixed in those tables. 12. Further, I consider that L Ltd/I Ltd should maintain records of what remedial work they have carried out at the property and they were unable to provide any information to that effect. Therefore I consider it reasonable to rely on KX’s defect lists and updated defects lists provided in evidence. 13. I am satisfied from the evidence presented, mainly photographic evidence contained within the