Search Results

1. [2024] NZIACDT 18 – KL v Lawlor (24 May 2024) [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...that she was out of New Zealand at the time the application was made, in accordance with immigration instruction S6.10(b) (effective 14 March 2022).1 Mr Lawlor did not inform the complainant. [14] On 5 April, 8, 24 and 25 May 2023, the complainant requested updates from Mr Lawlor or asked him if he was getting her emails. There was no response from him. [15] On 25 May 2023, the complainant called Immigration NZ seeking an update. She was informed a decision had been made on 30 Novem...

2. [2006] NZEmpC WC 15/06 OCS Ltd v Food Workers Union Inc [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...could unilaterally implement the new time keeping system. Ms Highfield advised Mr Menkin of the existence of an employment relationship problem, and said that until the problem was resolved, it was inappropriate to implement the system. She also requested mediation. [27] As Mr Menkin was on leave at that time, Ms Highfield copied the e-mail to Ms Kyle and Mr McBride, OCS’s solicitor. She further requested that the new timekeeping system and associated training be put on hold...

3. [2013] NZEmpC 190 Belsham v Ports of Auckland Ltd [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...than one occasion, to man the straddle crane. This was also confirmed by the evidence of Ms Flynn and in her file note prepared later that morning. [11] While waiting for Mr Kirwan, Mr Belsham had a later conversation with Mr Kitching when he requested the hazard book. He also prepared a hazard reporting form which he timed at 7 am. This related to the container leaking chemicals. He maintained that he handed the hazard notice to the health and safety manager at around 7.15 am...

4. BORA Law Reform (Epidemic Preparedness) Bill [pdf, 219 KB]

   LPA-01-01-10 4 April 2006 ATTORNEY-GENERAL LEGAL ADVICE CONSISTENCY WITH THE NEW ZEALAND BILL OF RIGHTS ACT 1990: LAW REFORM (EPIDEMIC PREPAREDNESS) BILL 1. We have considered whether the Law Reform (Epidemic Preparedness) Bill (PCO 6763/16) (the “Bill”) is consistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (the “Bill of Rights Act”). We understand that the Bill is likely to be considered by the Cabinet Policy Committee at its meeting on Wednesd...

5. LCRO 170/2020 KLM Limited v ND (30 March 2021) [pdf, 276 KB]

   ...decision was being finalised and would be sent to [KLM] shortly. The Committee’s file note also records that in response to [KLM]’s question whether it had provided sufficient information to the Committee, the LSO stated that the Committee had not requested any additional information. [35] Neither the LCS nor the Committee appear to have informed [KLM] that Mr ND denied [KLM]’s allegations. 7 Deliu v Connell [2016] NZHC 361, [2016] NZAR 475 at [2]. 7 [36] Standar...

6. Director of Proceedings v Platz [2021] NZHRRT 51 [pdf, 500 KB]

   ...leading up to this decision. Publishing Mr A’s name and other identifying details along with the very detailed Agreed Summary of Facts would have the specific adverse consequence of causing Mr A’s family significant further distress if this information was in the public arena. [11] It was also submitted by counsel that as Mr A is not a party to this proceeding but was simply a consumer of the services provided by Dr Platz, there is no public interest in knowing Mr A’s name or his...

7. Bay of Plenty Regional Council Submissions - 29 November 2017 [pdf, 492 KB]

   ...manner consistent with tikanga and utilising matauranga Maori. 4. The Appellants seek a collaborative or partnership approach between Council (and potentially other agencies), and tangata whenua. 5. All appeals have been the subject of various forms of ADR and hearings. In the case of MRMT the hearings have focussed on the jurisdictional parameters to inform the relief now proposed for determination in this merits hearing. That relief has continued to evolve, including through the e...

8. Rice - Part Rangiuru No2A Roadway (2014) 107 Waiariki MB 148 (107 WAR 148) [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...(Heard at Rotorua) Judgment: 17 November 2014 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY Introduction [1] Geoffrey Rice seeks a determination of ownership per s 18(1)(a) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 of Part Rangiuru No 2A Roadway (“the unformed road”). He asks that the Court cancel the unformed road because he says it is no longer required. Mr Rice also requests that the cancelled part of the road be re-vested in a block of General land he owns, Rangiuru No 2A No 9A....

9. [2017] NZEnvC 123 Dunedin City Council v Saddle Views Estate Ltd [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...'s concern is that any extensions could creep into the ridges (or edges) of Jaffray Hill which it is seeking to protect in the meantime. [28] I am sympathetic to the operational difficulties facing SVEL and have considered whether I should request more detailed evidence as to the extent of the working areas requested by SVEL. On reflection, that is inappropriate. SVEL is in effect asking for a de facto resource consent from the court. I consider that in a situation where SVEL h...

10. Tucker v Real Estate Agents Authority (Application for Closed Hearing) [2019] NZHRRT 49 [PDF, 287 KB]

    ...Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 1 November 2019 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL DECLINING APPLICATION BY PLAINTIFF FOR A CLOSED HEARING1 Background [1] On 20 September 2016 the Real Estate Agents Authority received from Mr Tucker a request under IPP 6 for access to all his personal information then held by the Authority. In these proceedings Mr Tucker alleges the Authority failed to comply with that request within the time mandated by the Privacy Act 1993, s 40. The Autho...