Search Results

1. LCRO 184/2015 WD v YR (6 July 2017) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...[30] The application for review was not withdrawn and in October 2016 Mr WD provided a “Complete statement for LCRO hearing” which was forwarded to Mr YR.20 [31] No further comment was received from Mr YR, and in November 2016 this Office requested consent from both parties for the review to be completed on the material to hand. Both parties provided their consent and the review was scheduled for completion on the papers.21 [32] On 27 February 2017 this Office received a docum...

2. Waitangi Tribunal - Preparing claimant evidence for the Waitangi Tribunal [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...Illustrations________________________________________________17 Funding ___________________________________________________________18 How Many Traditional History Reports Are Needed? ________________________18 v Preface This booklet has been written in response to claimant requests. It is designed to assist claimants with information about what they need to do to prepare their claims for an inquiry by the Waitangi Tribunal. Part i provides a step-by-step guide for pre- paring claim...

3. [2012] NZEmpC 192 Sayers v S B McPherson Holdings Ltd [pdf, 71 KB]

   ...report the accident to his employer, the respondent. In essence, he alleged that he understood the respondent’s policy was that he did not need to report minor accidents and that he had discretion as to what should or should not be reported. He claimed to have formed this view based on what he said was ‘common knowledge’ and on certain instructions that had been given to him by his predecessor, Mr Graham Rubick. [8] After an investigation, Mr Sayers was informed on 17 Novem...

4. Cook v Manawatu Community Law Centre (Costs) [2021] NZHRRT 57 [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...papers DATE OF DECISION: 20 December 2021 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON COSTS1 INTRODUCTION [1] Following a three-day hearing from 6 to 8 July 2020 the Tribunal, in Cook v Manawatu Community Law Centre [2021] NZHRRT 10, upheld Ms Cook’s claim of an interference with her privacy and awarded damages of $6,000 against the Manawatu Community Law Centre (MCLC) under ss 85(1)(c) and 88(1)(c) of the Privacy Act 1993 (PA) for hurt and humiliation and injury to the feelings of Ms Cook...

5. Shepherd & Ors as Trustees of the Bell Shepherd Family Trust v Lay [pdf, 288 KB]

   ...hearing I was told that neither Mr Townsend nor Counsel had been aware of the company’s removal, and steps were being taken to have the company reinstated on the Register. Therefore, I am proceeding on the assumption that JTL is still a legally formed and registered company 3.8 The ninth respondent is Mr Peter Townsend, who is a director of JTL. The Owners claim that Mr Townsend has a personal liability for the claims that they Claim 00062 – Ponsonby Gardens Unit 7...

6. Waitangi Tribunal - 30 April 2015 Record of Inquiry index [pdf, 667 KB]

   ...Ruakaka, Takahiwai, Maungakaramea, Poupouwhenua, Motutere Island, Te Mahe and Waipu land blocks, and other lands taken for Public Works. Further concerns are coastal lands and the seabed around Bream Bay, fishing rights and mineral rights. The claim requests the return of land, some of which now appears to be in private ownership Status: Consolidated 1.1.0056(a) Wai 504, 1.1(a) Amendment Received: 5 Nov 99 1.1.0057 Wai no: 510, 1.1 Date of SOC: 28 Apr 95 Date received: 09 May 95 Claimant: A...

7. Tabram v Slater [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...[70] The Buy Smart Report – the relevant factors………………………………..[75] The level of general knowledge about leaky buildings in 2005…………………………………………………………………….[76] The information contained in the Buy Smart Report………………[77] The documents produced by Mr Slater when the report was discussed………………………………………………………………[79] The comments made by Mr Slater a...

8. Moore - Waitara East Section 81 B [2018] Chief Judge's MB 842 (2018 CJ 842) [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...4.10(3) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 seeking to review the Registrar’s decision to refuse to file an application made by him on 7 May 2018 pursuant to s 45 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (A20180003483). [2] Following a number of requests to Mr Moore to provide further information, the Registrar informed the applicant by letter dated 10 August 2018 of her decision to refuse to file the application on the basis that it did not comply with r 8.2(2)(b) of the Māori Land

9. BN v AW [2020] NZDT 1480 (8 October 2020) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...timber fence. However, the purpose of the fence at the time it was built would have been to demarcate the boundary, and to contain small children and dogs (being those that would not leap a 1.1m fence). A fence at that height would not provide a form of security, but regardless of the height, anyone could enter off the street. The fence also does not provide much of a visual screen, being low by modern standards, but the fence at the time was in keeping with the surrounding area and was...

10. ZG Ltd v C Ltd [2019] NZDT 1506 (12 September 2019) [pdf, 184 KB]

    ...truthfulness of the Customer’s … statements….” 2. In January 2018, C Ltd applied via ZG’s Online Application Centre to finance the sale of a car to WS. On 17 January 2018, ZG returned the result “Approved with no recourse. Based on information supplied, subject to due diligence and the terms of your dealer agreement” and subject to a list of conditions including provision of specific information and documents. On Monday 22 January, ZG could not contact Mr WS’s employer du...