Search Results

1. [2019] NZEnvC 034 Remarkables Park Limited v Queenstown Airport Corporation Limited [pdf, 392 KB]

   ...v QAC - PWA DECISION 2 confirmed by the Environment Court in March 2017, with the appeal against its decisions being finally determined by the High Court in March 2018. [3] As this is an objection to taking of land, this decision takes the form of a report to the Queenstown Airport Corporation Ltd. While in written submissions Remarkables Park Ltd said the "sole issue" for determination was whether the taking was fair, sound and reasonably necessary in terms of s 24(7)...

2. Ngāti Pāoa Trust Board v Ngāti Pāoa Iwi Trust - Ngāti Pāoa [2020] Maori Appellate Court MB 318 (2020 APPEAL 318) [pdf, 323 KB]

   ...Māori Land Court jurisdiction to review a s 30 determination:14 30I Review of advice or determination (1) The Maori Land Court may review any advice or determination supplied by it under section 30(1) if,— (a) in the case of advice, it is requested to do so by the court, commission, or tribunal at whose request that advice was supplied; and (b) in other cases, the Chief Judge is satisfied, on receipt of a written application, that a review is necessary. (2) The court may re...

3. Huia-Collective-CIA-FINAL-v2.docx.pdf [pdf, 8.3 MB]

   ...protective measures Māori used and applied to some of their personal property. The ritual of waerea does not necessarily change the sacred (tapu) nature of anything. It simply clears away undesirable spiritual obstructions, and seeks to protect the performer or his people spiritually. Whakanoa was used for similar reasons but is used to render anything common. 1.2. Kopuapangopango Trust Inc: Kopuapangopango Trust is a Charitable Trust set up within the structure of Matau Marae. The curr...

4. [2016] NZEmpC 7 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 372 KB]

   ...[2015] NZEmpC 165. [3] In the notice of opposition the defendant argues that the amendments are unnecessary as the full Court’s findings on the presently pleaded issues will apply equally to the Wairoa plant and workers and today I am informed would also apply to the Horotiu works. Any remedies granted would also equally apply to those workers. It is further argued that a further amendment so close to the hearing will give rise to prejudice as no evidence relating to t...

5. 2014 to 2018 Ministry of Justice statement of intent [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   Statement of intent 2014–2018 E.64 SOI (2014) 1 Introduction from the Minister of Justice 2 Introduction from the Chief Executive 4 Who we are Our responsibilities Who we work with 6 Our operating environment Government priorities Sector priorities 8 What we want to achieve Our business strategy Our performance framework 10 What we will do Safer communities A fairer and more responsive justice system The integrity of our institutions is maintained

6. [2021] NZIACDT 7 - IMH v Marica (22 March 2021) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...attempted to file the complainant’s visa application online, but was unable to do so as his visa had expired the previous day. Accordingly, she sent an urgent email to Mr Gimranov and the office manager stating that it was imperative that a s 61 request be lodged.2 However, no such application was prepared. [12] Mr Gimranov’s licence was then cancelled by the Authority on 15 September 2016 and Ms Marica returned to New Zealand on about 19 September. [13] The complainant...

7. Real Estate Agents Authority v Wallace [2016] NZREADT 71 [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...ten days, and that she was unwell. She gave no information as to the nature of the trial. On 6 July 2016, Ms Wallace provided a medical certificate which stated that: Ms Wallace is emotionally too fragile to produce any letters or documents requested by the Real Estate Tribunal. I expect she will not be able to do this for at least 4 weeks. [10] In its Minute (2) dated 12 July 2016 (“Minute (2)"), the Tribunal advised Ms Wallace that the medical certificate was inadequat...

8. [2023] NZEmpC 36 Hilford v Board of Trustees of Whangarei Boys’ High School [pdf, 253 KB]

   ...and Mr Halse could apply to the Authority for inspection of the information, which could then impose any conditions that may be necessary for security purposes.3 [7] Believing that at this stage Mrs Hilford had not destroyed the documents as requested, WHBS issued a proceeding seeking a sanction against her for breach of the compliance order. [8] Prior to the hearing of the challenge, an application for non-publication was made. The application related to three particular docum...

9. [2006] NZEmpC AC 47/06 Cliff & Groom v Air NZ Ltd [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...was so concerned about the new data that she wanted to engage her own experts to review the information to ensure that it was accurate. She asked for an adjournment of the 24 November meetings to allow time to review the new information. That request was refused by Mr Motet. [78] At Mr Cliff’s dismissal meeting, Mr Waite read from the tabulated summary of the 16 November meeting. The reasons for his dismissal were later set out in a letter to Mr Cliff. These were: 1. The t...

10. [2006] NZEmpC AC 39/06 Epic Packaging Ltd v NZ Amalgamated Engineering Printing & Manufacturing Union [pdf, 123 KB]

    ...offered an opportunity to be represented and heard in the proceeding as interveners. NZCTU took that opportunity. Business New Zealand considered that its interests would be sufficiently represented by counsel for the plaintiff and was content to informally support the plaintiff’s case. [6] The central issue for the Court is whether it is open to the union to initiate bargaining for an agreement that EPL become a subsequent party to the Plastics agreement by giving notice unde...