KT v QN [2022] NZDT 106 (8 September 2022) [pdf, 106 KB]
...to him. This is a breach of contract on QN’s part and damages arising from the breach have been claimed by KT. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 5. KT is entitled to be put in the position he would have been had the contract been performed by QN. KT has provided evidence proving that to purchase a similar vehicle and the parts, he would have to import parts and pay over $90,000.00 all up. He provided a registered valuation of the same vehicle showing a valuation of $50...