LCRO 133/2017 AD v BE (18 September 2019) [pdf, 349 KB]
...and CF that [EJP] should instruct Mr AD to act for it in those proceedings. [15] Mr AD agreed to act for [EJP]. He was instructed to oppose the liquidation proceedings. 3 [16] The liquidation proceedings were adjourned twice at Mr AD’s request. [17] A third request for an adjournment was made by Mr AD on 30 September 2016, however an Associate Judge declined that request and put [EJP] into liquidation. [18] Mr AD then informed [EJP] that he could no longer act for it. The...