Canterbury Westland Standards Committee 2 v A Practitioner [2020] NZLCDT 32 (13 October 2020) [pdf, 117 KB]
...nor denying those two charges. [5] This is one of those rare cases where delay has proven therapeutic, and resolution has been worth the wait. The public has been protected, because the practitioner stepped away from practice while unwell, even requesting voluntary removal from the Roll in the early stages. And in the end, the career of a competent lawyer has been preserved. 3 [6] The approach to penalty has developed considerably over the two and a half years. As Mr v...