Search Results

1. Green v Wiari Green Estate - Uekaha A12BA2 (2004) 123 Otorohanga MB 197 (123 OT 197) [pdf, 422 KB]

   ...not give power to the Maori Land Court to levy interest for late payment of costs incurred on partition and I am unable to find any other authority for the levying of interest by this Court. I am therefore unable to make the order for interest requested by the Estate. Minute Book: 123 OT 204 Final Account The decisions I have made above mean that the accounts for fencing and formation of the roadway differ for each party. In particular the Kohatu Green whanau do not have to...

2. Attorney General - Marlborough Sounds (1998) 5 Te Waipounamu Appellate MB 3 (5 APTW 3) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...exception all stated in their grounds for appeal, inter alia, that the lower Court erred in its interpretation of the Ninetv I\,{i!" Rp~ch case decision and its application to the matter andl or in failing to state -- a case to the High Court requesting clarification of the correctness or otherwise of the principles expounded in that case. Most also disputed the interpretation placed on section 7 referred to above. The Appellate Court gave notice first that it would hear as...

3. [2019] NZEnvC 051 Ngati Whatua Orakei Whaia Maia Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.7 MB]

   ...Kaitiaki Engagement Plan that could be held over until the Court determines whether or not they should apply. [9] The Applicants advise that the Advice Note proposed ahead of Conditions 10- 16 in Appendix A to the application was inserted at the request of Ngati Whatua Orakei Whaia to provide greater clarity that conditions 10 - 16 are to operate on an interim basis, pending resolution to the appeal. All s274 parties, save Ngati Te Ata, oppose the inclusion of the Advice Note. Panuk...

4. [2022] NZIACDT 4 - ZI v Wan Sanctions (3 March 2022) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...in breach of cl 19(c). (6) Failed to update the client about a letter from Immigration NZ or an extension granted, in breach of cl 26(b). (7) Failed to provide the client’s newly instructed immigration adviser with a copy of the full file on request, in breach of cl 26(f). [29] In that earlier complaint, the Tribunal censured Mr Wan and ordered him to pay a financial penalty of $1,000. He was also ordered to pay $4,355 to his client, being a refund of fees of $1,995 and compens...

5. [2024] NZEnvC 086 Lake v Auckland Council [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...v Manawatu District Council, EnvC Wellington W55/2001, 19 July 2001 at [22]. 4 not matters undertaken prior to the hearing of the proceeding.4 (c) the costs sought in relation to the NTF can be put to one side as it is a separate issue and forms part of separate proceedings that are governed under the Building Act 2004. (d) clause 10.7(d) of the Environment Court Practice Note 2023 provides that the Court will not normally award costs against a public body unless it has fail...

6. Hristovski v Accident Compensation Corporation (Jurisdiction) [2023] NZACC 159 [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...incorrectly or that the AMA Guidelines have not been followed. This requires credible expert evidence directed at the specific aspects of the assessment which are said to be incorrect. [31] Mr Gee submits that Dr Meads has plainly taken account of the information provided by Dr Obednikovski and concludes a 20% whole person impairment. [32] Mr Gee submits that Dr Meads' assessment is correct as was stated by Judge McLean in Crouchman: • It is not for the Court to form an opin...

7. [2018] NZEnvC 108 Dromgool v Minister for Land Information [pdf, 4.7 MB]

   jBEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA AUCKLAND IN THE MATTER AND BElWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 108 of the Public Works Act 1981 (the Act) of an appeal under ss 23 and 24 of the Act S & D DROMGOOl (ENV-2017-AKl101) AD & J POULTON (ENV-2017-AKl102) NEWMAN FARMS LIMITED (ENV-2017-AKl-103) Objectors MINISTER FOR lAND INFORMATION Respondent Court: Judge JA Smith Commissioner ACE leijnen Commissioner 1M Buchanan Hearin

8. CA v DO LCRO 68 / 2012 (26 September 2013) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...this review. Background [5] In November 2009 CA was approached by a neighbour and friend of the complainant’s mother, DP. I will refer to DO, the complainant, as ‘the Complainant’. 2 [6] DP’s neighbour and friend, on her behalf, requested CA to assist DP in resisting the intention of her family to move her into a rest home. The approach to CA was made on Wednesday 25 November 2009, and the family’s stated intention was to relocate DP on the following Monday. [...

9. LCRO 20/2016 LC and CM v JP (19 March 2019) [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...signed (the agreement). The agreement required the applicants to pay the 10 per cent deposit immediately on completion of the auction. The vendor’s agent was from [AH] (the agent). [3] Mr JP received paperwork from the agent which included a form dated 26 March 2015 for the applicants to sign, authorising the agent to release the deposit 2 from its trust account before the statutory 10 day period had passed (the authority).1 Although the authority was signed and stamped a...

10. [2018] NZSSAA 44 (14 September 2018) [pdf, 261 KB]

    ...the appellant’s SLP/carer. The appellant considers that it is suspended. He said he asked the Ministry to suspend his SLP/carer pending the outcome of this appeal. However, the Ministry says it cancelled it because he did not complete the form confirming his circumstances. [13] At the second hearing, Ms Siueva agreed to review the circumstances surrounding the suspension/cancellation of the appellant’s SLP and, if the appellant’s entitlement to SLP had not changed, reinstat...