Search Results

1. Otago Standards Committee v Rayner [2014] NZLCDT 62 [pdf, 87 KB]

   ...Ms Anderson drew from what the practitioner said, but was asking for what he actually said, she responded that she didn’t know why else she would have put that in her notes. [42] During oral evidence the Tribunal asked Ms Anderson if she had formed a view as to the reliability and accuracy of statements and responses made to her by M. She responded that there were consistencies in some things that were said with what the practitioner acknowledged and that she thought the statemen...

2. Territorial Authorities - JS McGirr - Supplementary - 12 May 2021.pdf [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...a representative of Queenstown Lakes District Council (QLDC) a territorial authority holding responsibilities relating to the provision of water supply infrastructure in the Otago Region. 4. The purpose of my evidence is to provide further information to inform the Court about the nature of water use within the QLDC community supplies that may be subject to Plan Change 7 (PC7). 5. QLDC does not have any water take permits expiring within the likely operative time frame of PC7....

3. FIANZ-Submission.pdf [pdf, 13 MB]

   ...Five Eyes partners or Facebook on this matter and as such many questions remained unanswered. The Five Eyes partners have superior cyber tracking and search capabilities which were not used in this case. To our knowl- edge Facebook was also not requested to provide information. The Coroner can seek responses to answer the questions. 14 https://christchurchattack.royalcommission.nz/the-report/part-6-what-public-sector-agencies-knew-about-the-terrorist/did-public-sector-agencies-...

4. [2006] NZEmpC AC 51/06 Fuiava v Air New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...June 2004. She was required to be able to recognise documents and, where necessary, report dangerous goods. [29] On 9 February 2005, she presented a consignment of goods for shipment using her staff cargo concession, completed the necessary forms and answered “No” to all four security questions. When the consignment was x-rayed it was found to contain two aerosol cans of insect spray which came into the category of dangerous goods. The consignment also contained food stuffs...

5. Wouldes v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 409), Tremain & Nathan [2017] NZREADT 67 [pdf, 343 KB]

   ...sought legal advice. Their purchase offer was conditional on a building inspection. The building inspection focused on the apartment, rather than the complex, and was non-destructive. [7] Mr and Mrs Wouldes also received a pre-contract disclosure form from the Body Corporate for the complex which stated (as relevant): 10. The unit or the common property is not currently and has never been the subject of a claim under the Weathertightness Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 or an...

6. Vaka v Accident Compensation Corporation (Personal Injury) [2024] NZACC 197 (2 December 2024) [pdf, 302 KB]

   ...[11] Following discharge, Mr Vaka returned to school but missed much of the 2017 academic school year due to ongoing symptoms with hospital admissions and medical appointment/tests. [12] On 15 August 2017, Dr Beard, GP, completed an Injury Claim form seeking cover for both concussion and diabetes insipidus because of the June 2016 head injury. [13] On 15 January 2018 the Corporation received a specialist opinion from Mr Jefferies, Paediatrician and Endocrinologist, who co...

7. Auckland Standards Committee 5 and Southland Standards Committee v Taia [2022] NZLCDT 17 (9 June 2022) [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...serious disciplinary aspects of the charges arose from Mr Taia’s denials and avoidance of communication about the matter.1 The details are that Mr Taia: • misled the client that the work had been done;2 • he failed to respond to client requests for information;3 • failed to complete documentation relating to his former role as trustee;4 • failed to hand over his files in a timely manner;5 • failed to provide information to his client’s accountant and when instruct...

8. Ratima v Sullivan - Tataraakina C Trust (2012) 18 Takitimu MB 75 (18 TKT 75) [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...will be sent to the case manager for approval by the Court. As part of his original expression of interest Mr Hemana gave an indication of the likely costs that would be incurred for his services. Contract for services [8] Mrs Awatere-Huata requested permission to attend the Chamber’s conference and make further submissions on her position. More recently Mrs Awatere-Huata has been in contact with Court staff seeking clarity as to the status of her contract and whether or not it...

9. CAC 20005 v Austin [2013] NZREADT 108 [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...agent represents a complete picture of the property and not just selectively the best information which is available about the property. [23] We therefore find that Mr Austin’s conduct breaches s 72 of the Act. Penalty [24] The Tribunal request submissions on penalty. The CAC to file their submissions within 14 days of the judgment being received. Mr Austin to file his submissions 14 days after receipt of the CAC submissions. The CAC shall have a right of reply (strictly in repl...

10. J v NZLS [2012] NZLCDT 27 [pdf, 94 KB]

    ...to s 42, against the refusal to issue a practising certificate to the appellant. [2] The appellant made an application for a practising certificate and an application for membership of the New Zealand Law Society (voluntary) in a standard form intituled such on 26 September 20111. This was supported by a letter to the New Zealand Law Society from the appellant dated 4 March 20122 where at paragraph 2 the appellant said: “I consider the issue for the Committee is whethe...