Search Results

1. [2018] NZEnvC 181 Ballantyne Barker Holdings Ltd v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 19 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 181 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to section 120 of the Act BALLANTYNE BARKER HOLDINGS LIMITED (ENV-2017-CHC-047) Appellant QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J R Jackson Environment Commissioner R M Dunlop Hearing: at Queenstown on 7 and 8 March 2018 Final submissions received 17

2. E v D [2019] NZIACDT 2 (30 January 2019) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...proposal. It was not satisfied that the business met the relevant immigration instructions through increasing foreign expenditure in New Zealand. The business was not consistent in size or scale with what had been proposed. [36] Following a request from Ms T, Immigration New Zealand advised her on 24 November 2014 that if the business could not be sold within the visa period of six months, the couple would be required to submit a further application requesting an extension. S...

3. [2018] NZEnvC 067 Motiti Rohe Moana Trust v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 14 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 067 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of appeals pursuant to clause 14 of the First Schedule to the Act MOTITI ROHE MOANA TRUST (ENV-2015-AKL-134) NGATI MAKINO HERITAGE TRUST (ENV-2015-AKL-140) NGATI RANGINUI IWI INCORPORATED SOCIETY (ENV-2015-AKL-141) Appellants BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respon

4. 2018 NZEnvC 067 - Motiti Rohe Moana Trust and Others v Bay of Plenty Regional Council - Interim Decision of the Environment Court - 11 May 2018 [pdf, 14 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 067 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of appeals pursuant to clause 14 of the First Schedule to the Act MOTITI ROHE MOANA TRUST (ENV-2015-AKL-134) NGATI MAKINO HERITAGE TRUST (ENV-2015-AKL-140) NGATI RANGINUI IWI INCORPORATED SOCIETY (ENV-2015-AKL-141) Appellants BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respon

5. [2017] NZEmpC 130 ALA v ITE [pdf, 402 KB]

   ALA v ITE NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 130 [26 October 2017] THERE IS AN ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF THE NAMES OF THE PARTIES AND ANY INFORMATION LEADING TO THE PARTIES’ IDENTITY IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 130 EMPC 218/2017 IN THE MATTER OF an application for sanctions BETWEEN ALA Plaintiff AND ITE Defendant Hearing: 26 October 2017 (heard at Tauranga) Appearances: M Ward-Johnson, counsel fo

6. [2021] NZACC 4 - Ross v ACC (5 January 2021) [pdf, 268 KB]

   ...Initial Occupational Assessment (“IOA”) was completed over three separate days by Ms Sue Lawrence. The IOA detailed Ms Ross’ work experience over a 21-year period, during which she worked mostly in clerical roles, had strong analytical and informational skills and strong typing. The assessor went on to identify 11 job options that would be vocationally suitable for Ms Ross; and indicated that she could benefit from some updating in terms of her software knowledge and by unde...

7. 2023 NZPSPLA 036.pdf [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...20 August 2023. Any extension application needs to be made in writing before 20 August 2023 and set out why further time is needed and what has been done to date. Application for Suppression [77] Counsel for Mr Deane and Tigers Express has requested that a suppression order be made given the close relationship between Mr Deane, Tigers Express and Visions. He says this is required because I have no jurisdiction to deal with any complaints regarding Visions and Mr Deane and Visions...

8. [2024] NZEnvC 102 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Inc v West Coast Regional Council [pdf, 273 KB]

   ...had filed an appeal against a first instance decision to grant resource consent, dated 21 November 2017. The D-G joined the appeal under s274 RMA. The hearing was originally scheduled for July 2018 although that was adjourned (at Stevenson’s request) pending other superior court litigation. By that time evidence had been exchanged between the parties. [6] Despite being unsuccessful in securing access arrangements, Stevenson 2 Relying on both the 2020 and 2022 versions of the...

9. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v Telecom NZ 3760 [2013] NZCOP 14 [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...account holder’s daughters (dated 6 March 2013), to which the applicant responded (25 March 2013). A further submission was made, this time by the account holder, on 5 April 2013. The applicant responded in a letter headed “Reply by applicant to informal submission from account holder” (8 April). The applicant objected to the Tribunal’s consideration of this letter. For the reasons discussed below, the Tribunal takes the view that the letter should not be considered.

10. AT v ZH & Ors LCRO 127/2013 (26 March 2014) [pdf, 123 KB]

    ...It was helpful for the lawyers involved to attend the review hearing, although they were not required to do so. There is no evidence that the lawyers involved have deliberately added to the time and cost of this review. They made a reasonable request early on for a determination on jurisdiction, and have done nothing to protract the review process. There are no grounds on which to make an order that any of them should pay costs on review. Decision Pursuant to s 211(1)(a), the...