Search Results

1. [2009] NZEmpC AC 15/09 Air New Zealand Ltd v V [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...was not to be published because of his mother’s serious illness and the potential effects on her of publicity of the case. This application was renewed before us by the defendant and was not opposed by the plaintiff. Having considered the information provided to us, we made a permanent order under clause 12 of Schedule 3 to the Act that there be no publication of the defendant’s name or other information which might lead to his identification. As we have omitted all reference...

2. LCRO 184/2020 BC v NP and RS decision & minute (20 May 2021 & 30 April 2021) [pdf, 257 KB]

   ...processes [24] Ms BC’s complaint was initially assessed as being suitable for the Complaints Service’s Early Resolution Process (ERP). [25] That procedure involves a Standards Committee conducting an initial assessment of a complaint and forming a preliminary view as to outcome. [26] If the Committee’s preliminary view is that the complaint appears to lack substance, a Legal Standards Officer (LSO) will contact the respondent lawyer and inform them of the Committee’s pre...

3. Arthur v Accident Compensation Corporation (Vocational Independence) [2023] NZACC 36 [pdf, 253 KB]

   ...wrist splint, a gradual strengthening programme and for pain management services. [10] On 15 December 2012, an Initial Occupational Assessment (“IOA”) was undertaken by Ms Irene Taylor. She noted that Mr Arthur left school following sixth form and commenced, but did not complete, a building apprenticeship. His work experience covered 15 years in a range of jobs including work as a chef and a builder/labourer. His transferrable skills were detailed, along with 15 job options...

4. AE v Decision to prosecute LCRO 93/2013 & 338/2013 (11 March 2014) [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...entering into the agreement had retired and was then based in [the UK]. [9] She advised that she required the services of a lawyer because her ex husband wanted to have a record of the payments that he was about to make pursuant to the agreement and requested Mr AE to send her his “retainer procedure”.6 [10] Mr AE did not know Ms GR and he advises that her enquiry probably arose through his website. [11] Mr AE responded and requested Ms GR to provide her physical address. H...

5. Te Korowai Tiaki o Te Hauāuru Incorporated Society v Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Tama Trust (2019) 407 Aotea MB 47 (407 AOT 47) [pdf, 319 KB]

   ...registration 6 See, for example, Taueki v Horowhenua 11 Part Reservation Trust – Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Block 920160 347 Aotea MB 269 (347 AOT 269) at [17]. 407 Aotea MB 52 application forms that were sent to the PO Box during that period were “returned to sender”; (c) some voting packs for the recent trustee election process were not received by registered beneficiaries; (d) some beneficiaries who wished to register a...

6. Karena v Whitfield - Omahu 4C Section 6 [2018] Māori Appellate Court MB 170 (2018 APPEAL 170) [pdf, 302 KB]

   ...on 7 April 2017 in the Māori Land Court registry in Hastings. This is within the 2 month time period set out in s 58(3) of the Act. The appeal was rejected by the Deputy Registrar on the basis that it should have been filed in the prescribed form at the Māori Appellate Court registry in Wellington. Unfortunately, Mr Karena did not become aware of the Deputy Registrar’s decision until 19 May 2017, and only as a result of contacting the Court to request an

7. Proprietors of Potikirua Block Incorporated v Te Kani - Lot 1 Deposited Plan 8212 [2013] Chief Judge's MB 82 (2013 CJ 82) [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...is said the resolution was defeated (see paragraph 22 above). 31. Included in the requested documents from Counsel for the Applicant were various documents relating to Wharekahika A 15. 32. A letter from Potts & Hodgson dated 3 December 1990 requesting that 'the Proprietors of Potikirua agree to the request by Wamoana Te Kani to partition the block known as Wharekahika A15' and that 'it is important that the proposal for partition be fully understood by the owners�...

8. Adoption Law Reform Targeted Engagement Report [pdf, 3.6 MB]

   TARGETED ENGAGEMENT: ADOPTION LAW REFORM REPORT Final Report Hāpaitia te ara tika pūmau ai te rangatiratanga mō ngā uri whakatipu. Foster the pathway of knowledge to strength, independence, and growth for future generations. 8 December 2021 Commercial In Confidence CONTENTS Preface 7 Dedication page 1 Introduction and Background 2 Aotearoa New Zealand’s adoption laws no longer reflect our society’s values, cultural expectations, or international best practice 2...

9. OIA-96282.pdf [pdf, 18 MB]

   gen, Section (9 ) (2) (a) Section (9 ) (2 ) (a) Justice Cenlre I 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 I Wellington T 04 918 8800 I F 04 918 8820 contactus@justice.govt.nzIwww.justice.govt.nz Our ref: OIA 96186 Tena koe - Official Information Act request: Victim Support Thank you for your email of 24 May 2022, requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information related to Victim Support. I have outlined your specific requests and my response to each below (please

10. [2012] NZEmpC 96 South Pacific Meats Ltd v Mohammed [pdf, 238 KB]

    ...irrelevant to re- engagement. No resolution was reached at the 6 August meeting. Mr Davis advised that Mr Mohammed would talk to his family before making a decision about a return to work. [36] A meeting was subsequently arranged at Mr Mohammed’s request for 18 August. The meeting did not go well. Mr Hamilton advised Mr Mohammed that as nothing had been heard from him since the last meeting (some 12 days earlier) the general position that had been offered to him had been fil...