Search Results

1. CARROLL v Coroners Court at Auckland (2013 NZHC 906) [pdf, 304 KB]

   ...that which occurs at the hearing rather than the making of findings by the Coroner. It is also very significant that it is not just the Coroner’s opinion which can enliven this provision. It also applies if the region’s Senior Police Officer forms the opinion that the conduct is likely to be called into question. [51] The provision’s statutory context is also inconsistent with the interpretation for which Ms Coumbe contends. Procedural protections for those affected by th...

2. Ngati Pahauwera Affidavits 1 of 4 [pdf, 20 MB]

   Takutai Moana Application Affidavits 2013/2014 No. Affidavit - Name Page 1 Adsett, James William 2 2 Adsett, Nell 7 3 Aranui, Gerald Brenton 8 4 Aranui, Maraea 14 5 Aranui, Tiwana 22 6 Bishop, David 27 7 Botica, Darren 60 8 Culshaw, Colin 64 9 Culshaw, William Henry 97 10 Edwards, Raymond Russell 113 11 Gadsby, Bella Carol 118 12 Gemmell, Arthur Thorpe 121 13 Green, Kuki 128 14 Halliday, Stuart 131 15 Hamilton, Hiro 136 16 Hape, Vilma Marie 143 17 Hawkins, A

3. Proactive-release-new-Whanganui-Courthouse-Cabinet-Paper_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 8.3 MB]

   ...Courthouse Implementation Business Case Date of issue: 04 April 2025 The following documents have] been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circu lar CO (23) 4. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be re leased . Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted and no public interest has been identified that would outweigh the reasons for withholding it....

4. [2019] NZEnvC 208 Aratiatia Livestock Limited v Southland Regional Council [pdf, 11 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 208 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act ARATIATIA LIVESTOCK LIMITED (ENV-2018-CHC-029) ... ( continued on last page) Appellants SOUTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J E Borthwick Environment Commissioner R M Bartlett Environment Com

5. Mansfield v Southwell LCRO 199 / 2010 (8 September 2010) [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...provides a framework in which these matters may be considered. 1999 LACL incorporated. Engaged in the business of breeding animals on a rural property (Callender property). Practitioner was not involved in these transactions. 2000 Partnership formed between the Applicant and T, (equal shares). Partnership purchased the Callender property. (Above lease to LACL continued). Practitioner acted in the formation of the partnership and purchase of the property. 2000 Practi...

6. C v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 414) & Complainant A [2018] NZREADT 20 [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...meet the Body Corporate rules was incorrect and it is likely she would have found herself in the same situation had the proper process been followed. This does not change the fact that the licensee breached Rules 5.1 and 6.2 when he ignored her request for assistance to gain approval for the dog. A conditional clause was clearly required in the complainant’s tender and then, since the Body Corporate preferred to not deal directly with the complainant at this stage of the proce...

7. LCRO 120/2017 ML v NM (19 March 2019) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...Court in respect of Mr NM’s capacity, the Court said in a Minute that those involved in Mr NM’s affairs “should take a collaborative view”. That is what Mr ML says he did, although he stopped short of providing everything, as Ms TS had requested, based on the contested premise that Mr NM had never lacked capacity, so there could be an effective change in control of Mr NM’s affairs. [17] In July 2016 the Family Court made directions in respect of:1 specific documents, fi...

8. Provision of Public Information for the 2020 Referendums [pdf, 857 KB]

   ...Information for the 2020 Referendums Date of issue: 3 December 2019 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (18) 4. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted and no public interest has been identified that would outweigh the reasons for withholding it...

9. Director of Proceedings v Summerset Group Holdings Ltd [2022] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 443 KB]

   ...Miss E with reasonable care and skill. There is public interest in the details of Summerset’s failures being published, as set out in the detailed Agreed Summary of Facts. This, however, involves Miss E’s very sensitive and private health information. There is little or no public 3 interest in the publication of Miss E’s name, nor in her being identified in connection with this case. [9] Publication of Miss E’s name alongside the very detailed Agreed Summary of Facts

10. [2022] NZREADT 26 He & An (22 November 2022) [pdf, 253 KB]

    ...Property, obtained the final signature of one of the Vendors, dated the first ASP and emailed it back to Mr He. [7] On 28 January 2020, the first ASP was cancelled as the finance condition was not satisfied. [8] On 11 February 2020, at their request, Mr He assisted the Purchasers to prepare another offer for the Property. By this time, the Property was subject to another contract, so the new offer was being prepared as a backup offer (the backup ASP). [9] As Mr Sharma was away fo...