Search Results

1. S Ltd v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 779 (20 November 2023) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...annum interest on overdue accounts, and made the buyer liable for “All legal and other fees incidental to the recovery”. 2. In August 2022, the buyer purchased roofing supplies from the seller on credit, but failed to pay the purchase price of $58,984.89 on the due date. On 7 March 2023, the seller issued a statement showing a debt of $62,201.69 including interest, and referred the debt to [Debt Collectors] for debt collection. [Debt Collectors] emailed a letter of demand to the buyer...

2. KH v BG [2024] NZDT 464 (29 May 2024) [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...BG The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. KH had a pre-existing personal guarantee to pay rent. KH says BG agreed, when she became a director in the company, she would guarantee the rent liability under cl 5.9 of the sale and purchase agreement. The company went into liquidation and KH, as a guarantor, had to pay his share of the rental arrears and incurred legal costs. He is seeking to recover those costs from BG. 2. BG says she did not agree...

3. BORA Wills Bill [pdf, 381 KB]

   Wills Bill 7 August 2006 Attorney-General LEGAL ADVICE CONSISTENCY WITH THE NEW ZEALAND BILL OF RIGHTS ACT 1990: Wills Bill (PCO 7080/11) Our Ref: ATT395/14 1. We have considered the Wills Bill ("the Bill") for consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 ("BORA"). We have identified two issues of prima facie inconsistency to which we draw your attention. After considering the justifications for these provisions under section 5 of the BORA we ha

4. E64 Angela Bull - EIC - VHHL [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...and yard are as visible as possible from the Viaduct Harbour Precinct to the south. That includes views from the Eastern Viaduct and Te Wero, along with the promenade and buildings further to the south (c) Mr McIndoe has proposed a change to clause 2.4(e) of the Design Requirements whereby signage on yard enclosure fences shall now be limited to 30% maximum solid area of any fence in place of the 10% maximum agreed in caucusing. Changes of a complementary nature have also been...

5. BORA Electoral Amendment Bill [pdf, 133 KB]

   31 August 2016 Attorney-General Electoral Amendment Bill (PCO18955/2.18) — Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 Our Ref: ATT395/257 1. We have examined this Bill for consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. We have concluded that while the Bill raises issues under ss 12(2), and 14 of the Bill of Rights Act, it appears to be consistent with that Act in terms of s 7. 2. In short: 2.1 The Bill follows the Justice and Electoral Com

6. [2008] NZEmpC AC 14/08 Board of Trustees of Te Kura Kaupapa Motuhake O Tawhiuau v Edmonds [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...“Submitting personal grievance” and continued that “Every employee who wishes to submit a personal grievance must … submit the grievance to his or her employer …”. The words “submit” or “submitted” were also used in later clauses of the Bill. They contrasted, however, with the original object section of Part 9 of the Bill, clause 115 that was adopted unaltered as s101(b). This referred to the facilitation of the “raising” of personal grievances wit...

7. [2024] NZEnvC 281 Save The Maitai Incorporated v Nelson City Council [pdf, 294 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 281 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act and Private Plan Change 28 to the Nelson Resource Management Plan BETWEEN SAVE THE MAITAI INCORPORATED (ENV-2022-CHC-65) Appellant AND NELSON CITY COUNCIL Respondent AND CCKV MAITAI DEV CO LP & BAYVIEW NELSON LIMITED Applicant Court: E...

8. [2021] NZACC 159 – Hawkins v ACC (12 October 2021) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...therefore considered the March 2007 salary change had occurred solely for the purpose of establishing a future weekly compensation entitlement, so it rejected the shareholder PAYE salary change as “unreasonably influenced” by the incapacity as per clause 31 of Schedule 1 of the 2001 Act and declared the appellant a “non earner” at her date of subsequent 23 July 2007 incapacity. No weekly compensation was therefore reinstated or backdated. 15. The respondent’s rejectio...

9. AD v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2023] NZACC 118 [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...cost of any required replacement labour; and (c) such other matters as may be relevant to the particular case. (2) The amount determined under subsection (1) must not be— 8 (a) less than 80% of the amount of weekly earnings specified in clause 42(3) of Schedule 1; or (b) more than the maximum amount of weekly compensation specified in clause 46 of Schedule 1. (3) The weekly compensation to be provided by the Corporation under this section must be set out in a written...

10. N Ltd v SQ & TQ [2023] NZDT 314 (25 July 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

    ...314 APPLICANT (Counterclaim Respondent) N Ltd RESPONDENT (Counterclaim Applicant) SQ SECOND RESPONDENT (Counterclaim Applicant) TQ The Tribunal orders: 1. N Ltd is to pay to SQ and TQ the sum of $5,863.31 on or before 16 August 2023. 2. The claim by N Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In 2021, N Ltd was asked to, and provided, a quote to SQ and TQ (“the respondents”) for architectural concept and building consent services for...