Search Results

1. Berry v Rondel LCRO 130 / 2011 (2 February 2012) [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...The Committee resolved to deal with all issues of complaint together because in the Committee’s view the main issue of complaint is that Mr Rondel did not follow the terms and conditions in the agreement. Specifically, instead of implementing clauses 1 to 5 - which required the trust to pay the remaining $70,000 in equal payments over ten years before title would be transferred to the Trust - Mr Rondel transferred title to the trust and provided a Loan Contract incorporating an A...

2. NQE v Tan [2013] NZIACDT 37 (13 June 2013) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...potential conclusions on the material presented before the Tribunal in order to give the parties the opportunity to consider their positions and provide submissions and further proof if they wish. The issues to be determined [50] The Minute identified clauses 1, 2, 3, and 8 of the Code of Conduct as potentially relevant, and also Section 44 of the Act in relation to negligence, incompetence and misleading behaviour. [51] The Minute discussed the following particular issues as potential...

3. [2012] NZEmpC 114 Salvation Army v Stewart & Johnstone [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...plaintiff's Bridge Programme in Christchurch. The second defendant is currently employed as a Senior Case Worker. Each defendant has been in continuous service since commencing employment with the plaintiff. Apart from the last word in the clause, the defendants' individual employment agreements both contain an identical annual leave clause: "Annual leave entitlement, in accordance with the Holidays Act 1981, is 3 weeks leave after the end of each year of empl...

4. Hastie and Dredge TRI-2023-100-001 Procedural Order 5 [pdf, 251 KB]

   ...TRUST Claimants AND BARRY RONALD BARNES and PAMELA HOLMES First Respondent AND BARRY RONALD BARNES Second Respondent AND CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND GRAEME JACOBS ARCHITECT LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 1496058) Fourth Respondent AND DSF BUILDERS LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 1863635) Fifth Respondent AND CONTRACT HOLDINGS LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 636388) Sixth Respondent PROCEDURAL ORDER 5 Removal application by the sixth respon...

5. [2006] NZEmpC AC 61/06 NZ Tramways and Public Passenger Transport Employees Union & Anor v Transport Auckland and Cityline (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 17 KB]

   ...process. This is new matter that has not previously been raised in the current proceedings. If allowed to be addressed it would widen the scope of the hearing. The current proceedings appeared to accept that the CEA was binding and contained a clause that required to be interpreted in the light of the Holidays’ legislation. Those are the issues presently before the full Court. [6] It also appears from email communications to the Court from the applicants and from the unswo...

6. [2011] NZEmpC 6 Green v Transpacific Industries Group NZ Ltd [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...person employed by us. 7.4 You acknowledge that the above restrictions are reasonable for the following reasons: 7.4.1 The periods, and areas, specified are appropriate to the nature and/or seniority of your position with us. 7.4.2 In respect of Clause 7.1, your knowledge and skills are easily transferable to positions with companies that do not compete with us. 7.5 Since we may suffer immediate and irreparable injury if you breach the above restrictions, we reserve the right t...

7. Coutts - Estate of James Pou (2008) 129 Whangarei MB 145 (129 WH 145) [pdf, 328 KB]

   IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT 129 Whangarei MB 145 A20060014284 UNDER Section 117, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 Hearing: Judgment: Introduction IN THE MATTER OF James Pou 13 July 2006 19 April 2007 26 September 2007 (Heard at Whangarei) 8 December 2008 WAYNE COUTTS Applicant RESERVED DECISION OF JUDGE D J AMBLER [1] The COUli has before it an application by Walter Pou to transfer the Maori land interests he holds as executor of the e

8. Hancock-Forest-Management-NZ-Limited.pdf [pdf, 133 KB]

   NOTICE BY HANCOCK FOREST MANAGEMENT (NZ) LIMITED OF WISH TO BE PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO S274 OF THE RMA 29 SEPTEMBER 2020 G K Chappell Barrister Vulcan Building Chambers DDI 09 300 1259 | E gillian@chappell.nz | PO Box 3320 Auckland 1140 | DX CP20546 | IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2020-AKL- AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO I TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act

9. COVID-19 Public Health Response (Validation of Managed Isolation and Quarantine Charges) Amendment Bill [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...difficult to draw a comparator group here, as Australians are already treated differently from other groups within our immigration system. 13. For these reasons, it does not appear that s 19 is engaged. Section 26(1) – Retroactivity 14. Clause 4 of the Bill will have retroactive effect by validating all previous charges that were incorrectly made. While this engages the principle that legislation should not have 3 See, for example, Atkinson v Minister of Health and others [20...

10. Hamilton City Council.pdf [pdf, 268 KB]

    ...COUNCIL Appellant AND WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE BY HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL TO BECOME A PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 274 OF THE ACT 28 September 2020 Westpac House 430 Victoria Street PO Box 258 DX GP 20031 Hamilton 3240 New Zealand Ph: (07) 839 4771 Fax: (07) 839 4913 tompkinswake.co.nz Solicitor: Marianne Mackintosh marianne.mackintosh@tompkinswake.co.nz Counsel: Lachlan Muldowney lachlan@muldowney.co.nz