Search Results

Search results for clause 5.

5995 items matching your search terms

  1. [2024] NZEmpC 5 MGE New Zealand 2010 Limited & McKay Ltd v Campbell [pdf, 225 KB]

    MGE NEW ZEALAND 2010 LIMITED v JAMES LIMERICK CAMPBELL [2024] NZEmpC 5 [19 January 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 5 EMPC 469/2023 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a search and ancillary orders BETWEEN MGE NEW ZEALAND 2010 LIMITED Applicant AND MCKAY LIMITED Second Applicant AND JAMES LIMERICK CAMPBELL First Respondent AND

  2. [2021] NZACC 103 - Reed v ACC (15 July 2021) [pdf, 180 KB]

    ...The term "independence" includes the capacity to function in several areas, including health care, mobility, and the use of transport.5 1 Section 69(1) of the Act. 2 Section 70 of the Act. 3 Section 79 of the Act. 4 Schedule 1, clause 12, definition of “transport for independence”. 5 Schedule 1, clause 12, definition of “independence”, subclauses (f), (h) and (m). [14] The Corporation is liable to provide a key aspect of social rehabilitation to a claim...

  3. BORA Social Security (Youth Support and Work Focus) Amendment Bill [pdf, 373 KB]

    ...life. This Bill addresses the issue of young people on welfare by changing the nature of the financial assistance young people can receive, by strengthening what they need to do in return for assistance, and by providing comprehensive support. Clauses 7, 8, 9, 10, and 15 of the Bill change the eligibility criteria for sole parents, widows, women alone, sickness and unemployment beneficiaries, and spouses and partners of people receiving a main benefit so that a person with a child must...

  4. Trustees of Owhaoko C Trust v Karena - Owhaoko C Trust (2017) 59 Takitimu MB 288 (59 TKT 288) [pdf, 436 KB]

    59 Tākitimu MB 288 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TᾹKITIMU DISTRICT A20170002346 A20160004001 A20160003998 UNDER Section 67, 113 and 220 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 and r 15.1 of the High Court Rules IN THE MATTER OF Owhaoko C Trust BETWEEN TRUSTEES OF OWHAOKO C TRUST Applicant AND WERO KARENA Respondent A20160003902 UNDER Sections 231, 238 and 240 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Owhaoko C Trus

  5. LR v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claim for overseas rehabilitation costs) [2023] NZACC 29 [pdf, 183 KB]

    ...However, the claim was declined because, at that stage, the Corporation was unable to establish an injury relating to treatment. The Corporation did not receive any further claims or requests for cover in the ensuing period of nearly three years. [5] On 24 May 2021, Ms Carrigan, advocate for the appellant, wrote to the Corporation. Ms Carrigan asked the Corporation to revisit its decision and confirmed that cover was sought for both twins. The mother provided a statement of sup...

  6. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v CAL2012-E000627 [2013] NZCOP 9 [pdf, 168 KB]

    ...either or both of the following: [a] A sum representing a contribution towards the fee or fees paid by the rights holder to the IPAP; and [b] Reimbursement of the application fee paid by the rights owner to the Tribunal (s.122O(3)). 7 [40] Clause 12(1) of the Regulations provides that the total amount the Tribunal may award, is the lesser of – [a] the sum of the amounts referred to in subclause (2)(a) to (d) of Regulation 12; and [b] $15,000. Determinations under Regul...

  7. DT v TX [2023] NZDT 291 (1 August 2023) [pdf, 149 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 M(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 291 APPLICANT DT RESPONDENT TX The Tribunal orders: 1. TX is to pay to DT the sum of $8,500.00 on or before 21 August 2023. 2. DT is to return the [vehicle] to TX at his address in [City 1] on or before 21 August 2023. The parties are to complete the necessary documentation to transfer ownership of the vehicle back to TX wi

  8. CG & XG v QC & KC [2025] NZDT 109 (4 March 2025) [pdf, 220 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2025] NZDT 109 APPLICANT CG APPLICANT XG RESPONDENT QC SECOND RESPONDENT KC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. CG and XG bought a property in [town] from QC and KC, who had owned it as trustees of the C Trust. CG and XG say that shortly after they bought the property, they became aware of problems

  9. Hamilton City Council.pdf [pdf, 250 KB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2020-AKL-000098 AUCKLAND REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act against the decision of the Waikato Regional Council on Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan BETWEEN WAIRAKEI PASTORAL LIMITED Appellant AND WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE BY HAMILT...

  10. Ryan v Accident Compensation Corporation (Impairment Assessment) [2025] NZACC 015 (28 January 2025) [pdf, 260 KB]

    ...Schedule 1 to the Accident Compensation Act 2001 ("the Act") and the Injury Prevention, Rehabilitation and Compensation (Lump Sum and Independence Allowance) Regulations 2002 ("Lump Sum Regulations"). Specifically pursuant to clause 54(1)(c) of Schedule 1, the Corporation is liable to pay a lump sum if: (c) an assessment carried out under clause 59 establishes that the claimant's personal injury has resulted in a degree of whole-person impairment of 10% o...