Search Results

1. CBC v KFTO [2012] NZIACDT 34 (29 June 2012) [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...The Tribunal found: [2.3.1] Ms KFTO failed to provide Ms CBC with a basic understanding of the immigration requirements and process. She also failed to set out the services required in the service delivery agreement. That amounted to breaches of clause 1.5(a) and (b) of the Code. [2.3.2] When the professional engagement ended, Ms KFTO set a fee for her work which was excessive, and refused to refund fees paid. That amounted to a breach of clause 8 of the Code. [3] The sanctions which...

2. Potatoes NZ Incorporated.PDF [PDF, 880 KB]

   ...vegetable production on LUC I, LUC II and LUC III land using the Land Use Capability (LUC) Survey Handbook, including the flexibility to undertake crop rotations on multiple and/or changing properties as follows; …” Policy 3/Te Kaupapa Here 3 Clause (d) Provide clarity that the other pathways are open to authorise commercial vegetable growing based on an assessment of effects. “Recognise the positive contribution to people and communities from commercial vegetable...

3. QH v KH [2020] NZDT 1467 (2 December 2020) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...following: i. Gas bottles ii. Spa pool cover iii. Pool light iv. Garden lights v. Garage door remote vi. windows b. If so, what remedy, if any, is QH entitled to? Was there a breach of the vendors warranty in respect of the following: 4. Clause 9.2 (1) of the Sale and Purchase agreement provides a vendor’s warranty regarding the chattels. It states: 5. “the chattels and all plant, equipment, systems or devices which provide any services or amenities to the property, in...

4. EF v CQ & BQ [2022] NZDT 233 (29 November 2022) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...in contract for vendors to ensure that every aspect of a house they are selling is in good condition (except for new-builds where specific law applies). However, the sale and purchase agreement in this case contains the standard vendor warranties at clause 7.3(1) in relation to chattels and other “plant, equipment, systems or devices which provide any services or amenities to the property…” – the requirement is that they are delivered to the purchaser in “reasonable working order...

5. B Ltd v C Ltd [2024] NZDT 505 (2 July 2024) [pdf, 131 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 505 APPLICANT B Ltd RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: C Ltd is to pay B Ltd $3,361.33 by no later than 20th July 2024. Reasons 1. The Applicant states that pursuant to a sub-lease agreement with the Respondent, the Applicant is to ensure that all fixtures and fittings are to be serviced regularly by a qualified service provider (cl

6. TTC v BL [2013] NZIACDT 25 (4 April 2013) [pdf, 90 KB]

   BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2013] NZIACDT 25 Reference No: IACDT 025/11 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY Immigration Advisers Authority Authority BETWEEN TTC Complainant AND BL Adviser DECISION REPRESENTATION: Complainant: In person Adviser: In person Date Issued: 4 A

7. [2024] NZEnvC 059 Wildon Dairy Limited v Central Otago District Council [pdf, 1 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI OTAUTAHI IN THE MA TIER AND BETWEEN AND Decision l\J"o. [2024] NZEnvC 59 of the Resource Management Act 1991 an appeal under s120 of the Act WILDON DAIRY LIMITED (ENV-2023-CHC-34) Appellant CENTRAL OTAGO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J J M Hassan - sitting alone under s279 of the Act In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Consent Order: 27 March 2024 CONSENT ORDER A: U

8. BH v M Ltd [2025] NZDT 7 (13 January 2025) [pdf, 214 KB]

   (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2025] NZDT 7 APPLICANT BH RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. On or by 10 February 2025, M Ltd is to pay BH $8,057.56, calculated as: a. Garage roof $7,337.00 b. Drip tray $ 431.25 c. Agreed settlement for rangehood $ 289.31 Total $8,057.56 2. On or by 10 February 2025, M Ltd is to reissue its invoice describing the brand model and identification number of t

9. MO v X Ltd [2025] NZDT 111 (5 March 2025) [pdf, 197 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2025] NZDT 111 APPLICANT MO RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: X Ltd is to pay MO the sum of $1,103.00 on or before 26 March 2025. Reasons: 1. MO engaged X Ltd to apply paint protection film (PPF) to his freshly painted vehicle. 2. When MO viewed the painted and wrapped vehicle he had some concerns about the quality of the paint work, in p

10. Hamilton City Council.pdf [pdf, 221 KB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2020-AKL-000095 AUCKLAND REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act against the decision of the Waikato Regional Council on Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan BETWEEN MERCURY NZ LIMITED Appellant AND WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE BY HAMILTON CITY