Search Results

1. [2024] NZEnvC 161 Eden Epsom Residential Society Incorporated v Auckland Council [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   Eden Epsom Residential Protection Society Incorporated v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 161 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under clause 14(1) of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 against a decision on Private Plan Change 21 to the Auckland Unitary Plan BETWEEN EDEN-EPSOM RESIDENTIAL PROTECTION SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2020-AKL-079) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Resp...

2. OIA-121212.pdf [pdf, 3.5 MB]

   ...establishment of the Australian Government’s Foreign Arrangements Scheme. As a result, the Australian Foreign Relations (State and Territory Arrangements) Act 2020 (the Act) relevantly applies as follows: • the Act requires us to notify you that clause 4 of Schedule 1 to the Act applies and the Project Agreement is invalid and unenforceable; and • Clause 5 of Schedule 1of the Act applies and requires us to take steps to terminate the arrangement. Accordingly, we are giving writte...

3. Takimoana - Te Tii (Waitangi) B3 Ahu Whenua Trust (2014) 90 Taitokerau MB 67 (90 TTK 67) [pdf, 335 KB]

   90 Taitokerau MB 67 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20140003345 A20140003346 UNDER Section 19, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Tii (Waitangi) B3 Ahu Whenua Trust BETWEEN RICHARD BOYD TAKIMOANA MEREAWAROA DAVIES Applicants A20140003363 UNDER Section 18(1)(a), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Lot 18 DP 61631 BETWEEN MEREAWAROA DAVIES App

4. Lomu v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 95 (01 October 2014) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...written agreement), did not do the work and did not refund the fee paid. [3] The Tribunal upheld the complaint and found that Ms Tangilanu had failed to meet her obligations under the Code of Conduct in relation to her duty to carryout instructions (clause 1), requirement to have a written agreement (clauses 1.5 and 8), and also failed to refund unearned fees when the engagement came to an end (clause 3(d)). The Parties’ Positions on Sanctions The Authority [4] The Authority did n...

5. A & T Kaufusi v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 98 (01 October 2014) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...Hakaoro, Auckland. Adviser: In person Date Issued: 1 October 2014 2 DECISION This complaint [1] This decision imposes sanctions, following a decision upholding a complaint against Ms Tangilanu published at [2014] NZIACDT 54. The circumstances are set out fully in that decision (which can be located on the Ministry of Justice website: www.justice.govt.nz). [2] In summary the circumstances giving rise to the complaint were that: [2.1] Ms Tangilanu took fees d...

6. Prasad v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 88 (15 September 2014) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...Zealand’s concerns when they raised issues around the apparent inconsistencies between the applications lodged by her and that which had previously been lodged by the complainant. Her conduct lacked care, diligence and professionalism. She breached clause 1 of the Code of Conduct. [3] The second ground of complaint the Tribunal upheld was a breach of clause 1.1(c) of the Code of Conduct. That clause required the adviser to “take reasonable steps to ensure clients’ interests are rep...

7. Federated-Farmers-of-New-Zealand.pdf [pdf, 326 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2020-AKL-2020-AKL-00149 AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 A N D IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to clause 14(1) of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN LOCHIEL FARMLANDS LIMITED Appellant A N D WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE OF PERSON’S WISH TO BE PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS Section 274 Resource Management Act 1...

8. [2022] NZEnvC 028 Bridesdale Farm Developments Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...the Act BETWEEN BRIDESDALE FARM DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED (ENV-2019-CHC-097) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Hearing: Sitting alone under s279 of the Act Last case event: 25 February 2022 Date of Decision: 8 March 2022 Date of Issue: 8 March 2022 _______________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AS TO COSTS ____________________________________________________...

9. Wai 3300, 6.2.018 Wānanga ā-rohe background paper [pdf, 598 KB]

   ...University Press, Wellington, 2008) at 234. 5 Waitangi Tribunal Ngā Mātāpono – The Principles: The Interim Report of the Tomokia Ngā Tatau o Matangireia – the Constitutional Kaupapa Inquiry Panel on the Crown’s Treaty Principles Bill and Treaty Clause Review Policies (Wai 3300, 2024) at 53. 6 “mana motuhake” Te Aka Māori Dictionary <mana motuhake - Te Aka Māori Dictionary (maoridictionary.co.nz)>; and Manatū Taonga – Ministry of Culture and Heritage “Mana motuha...

10. Matchitt v Butler - Matangareka 3B Ahu Whenua Trust (2016) 154 Waiariki MB 261 (154 WAR 261) [pdf, 226 KB]

    154 Waiāriki MB 261 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20160006430 UNDER Sections 19 and 231 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Matangareka 3B Ahu Whenua Trust – Injunction and review of Trust BETWEEN EDWARD MATCHITT Applicant AND RICHARD JOHN BUTLER, THOMAS HENRY BUTLER, STEWART JAMES BUTLER, TUIHANA POOK, MAURA HIONA ROBSON AND MOANA PAREHUIA WAITITI AS THE RESPONSIBLE TRUSTEES OF THE