Search Results

Search results for clause 5.

5995 items matching your search terms

  1. [2022] NZEmpC 123 CSN v Royal District Nursing Service NZ Ltd [pdf, 376 KB]

    ...Vaccinations Order. Provision was also made for one dose being received before becoming an affected person and the second dose being received within 35 days after becoming an affected person. [45] The various definitions came together in two relevant clauses. Clause 7 of the Vaccinations Order provided that an “affected person must not carry out certain work unless they are … vaccinated …”. Clause 8 stated that “a relevant PCBU must not allow an affected person ... t...

  2. [2022] NZACC 137 — Wheeler v ACC (19 July 2022) [pdf, 262 KB]

    ...NZACC 137 ACR 061/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN DARRON WHEELER Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 15 July 2022 Held at: Hamilton/Kirikiriroa Appearances: The Appellant is self-represented S Churstain for the respondent Judgment: 19 July 2022 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Social Rehabilitation - Transport for in...

  3. 10. JWS 10 - Deemed Permits & Associated Rights of Priorities 2 & 5 July 2021 [pdf, 373 KB]

    447585.29#5369448v1 OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL PROPOSED PLAN CHANGE 7 JOINT WITNESS STATEMENT: PLANNERS; DEEMED PERMITS AND ASSOCIATED RIGHTS OF PRIORITIES IN THE MATTER of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) of the Resource Management Act 1991(the Act) BETWEEN OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant

  4. QQ v R Ltd [2024] NZDT 741 (2 October 2024) [pdf, 223 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 741 APPLICANT QQ RESPONDENT R Ltd The Tribunal orders: R Ltd is to pay to QQ the sum of $245.44 on or before 24 October 2024. Reasons: 1. R Ltd operate a hotel in [Town]. 2. In June 2024, QQ was a guest at the hotel. 3. QQ paid for the room by way of credit card. 4. After his stay, QQ discovered that two addition

  5. Rihari v Auckland - Takou (2021) 240 Taitokerau MB 42 (240 TTK 42) [pdf, 309 KB]

    240 Taitokerau MB 42 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE TAITOKERAU In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Taitokerau District A20190005122 A20190008647 WĀHANGA Under Sections 238 and 239, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Takou Block I WAENGA I A Between DOREEN RIHARI Te Kaitono Applicant ME And ANNETTE AUCKLAND, BRIAN HEIHEI, CURTIS PURU, WHATI RAMEKA, WAITAI TUA AND HOKI

  6. King Country Energy Limited.pdf [pdf, 214 KB]

    ...which this appeal relates. 3. KCE is not a trade competitor for the purposes of section 308C or 308CA of the RMA. 4. KCE has an interest in the following parts of the proceedings: (a) Objective 1 (b) Objective 2 (Freshwater Objective) 5. KCE opposes the relief sought by F&B to Objectives 1 and 2. Objective 1 5.1 The decisions version of Objective 1 states that “In relation to the effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, sediment and microbial pathogens on water quality, th...

  7. Hamilton City Council.pdf [pdf, 252 KB]

    ...CONSERVATION Appellant AND WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE BY HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL TO BECOME A PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 274 OF THE ACT 28 September 2020 Westpac House 430 Victoria Street PO Box 258 DX GP 20031 Hamilton 3240 New Zealand Ph: (07) 839 4771 Fax: (07) 839 4913 tompkinswake.co.nz Solicitor: Marianne Mackintosh marianne.mackintosh@tompkinswake.co.nz Counsel: Lachlan Muldowney lachlan@muldowney.co.nz...

  8. King Country Energy Limited.pdf [pdf, 214 KB]

    ...which this appeal relates. 3. KCE is not a trade competitor for the purposes of section 308C or 308CA of the RMA. 4. KCE has an interest in the following parts of the proceedings: (a) Objective 1 (b) Objective 2 (Freshwater Objective) 5. KCE opposes the relief sought by F&B to Objectives 1 and 2. Objective 1 5.1 The decisions version of Objective 1 states that “In relation to the effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, sediment and microbial pathogens on water quality, th...

  9. Miao v Huo [2015] NZIACDT 90 (06 October 2015) [pdf, 68 KB]

    BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 90 Reference No: IACDT 007/15 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Jinrui Miao Complainant AND Liang Huo Adviser DECISION UPHOLDING COMPLANT AND SANCTIONS REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Ms C

  10. BORA Depleted Uranium (Prohibition) Bill [pdf, 194 KB]

    ...production, acquisition, stockpiling, direct or indirect transfer, use, or military preparations for use, of uranium ammunition, armour, or weapons to be a criminal offence under Zealand law, with a penalty of up to 10 years imprisonment or a fine of $500,000. The Bill also provides for the extraterritorial application of the offence. UNREASONABLE SEARCH AND SEIZURE 5. Section 21 of the Bill of Rights Act provides the right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure. There ar...