Search Results

1. BORA Tauranga Moana Iwi Collective Redress Bill [pdf, 279 KB]

   ...Iwi, no other persons or groups who are not party to those claims are in comparable circumstances. Excluding others from those entitlements does not give rise to any differential treatment for the purpose of s 19. Whether s 27(3) at issue 7. Clause 15(3) of Schedule 2 to the Bill excludes damages and other forms of monetary compensation as a remedy for any failure by the Crown to comply with the conservation relationship agreement in relation to Te Kūpenga. 8. This clause may be s...

2. Heng v Yap [2014] NZIACDT 65 (28 May 2014) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...incompetent (section 44(2) of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act)). In particular, he failed to give proper advice before accepting instructions and then failed to deal properly with the consequences. [10.2] The adviser breached clauses 1.1(a) and 2.1(b) of the Licensed Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2010 (the Code). In particular, he allowed unlicensed employees to provide immigration advice. [11] The Registrar identified the material facts supporting the allega...

3. [2021] NZEmpC 55 MacLeod and Others v Wellington City Transport Ltd and CityLine (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 257 KB]

   ...does not require the conclusion of any particular kind of a collective agreement.4 (b) The issue about who the parties to a collective agreement should be is a fundamentally bargainable issue.5 Once bargaining has been initiated, the parties clause, along with all other terms and conditions, can be bargained. There is nothing unlawful about locking out employees to achieve a MECA which binds all the employees in bargaining. (c) Sections 45 and 47 of the Act relate to initiatio...

4. LCRO 183/2016 TA v CIB LIMITED (28 March 2019) [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...form agreement, lawyers must be thoroughly familiar with all of the provisions of the agreement and able to advise their clients accordingly. 10 [48] The agreement alerts parties to the need to be cognisant of possible GST implications. Clause 14.0 of the agreement (set out under the heading “zero – rating”) describes the GST implications when the agreement is negotiated between two GST registered parties. The section notes the particulars to be included in schedule two...

5. Cribb - Succession to Tieme Karepe, Te One Karepe, Hoani Karepe and Porokuru Te Kiwi [2025] Chief Judge's MB 373 (2025 CJ 373) [pdf, 366 KB]

   ...twelve children who are the rightful beneficiaries to succeed to his interests. (b) At 155 Rotorua MB 234 (155 ROT 234) Adelaide Thompson succeeded to the shares of Porokuru Te Kiwi in Tumu Kaituna 11B2 solely. The three named in the residue clause of his will are Adelaide Thompson, Eldridge Thompson and Hara Cribb. The applicant submits that Adelaide Thompson stated in her evidence to the Court that “the owners agreed that she take the total shares of this block and the othe...

6. Te Rununga o Ngati Hine - Determination of dispute between Te Rununga o Ngati Hine and Te Rununga a Iwi o Ngapuhi (2011) 28 Taitokerau MB 217 (28 TTK 217) [pdf, 216 KB]

   TE RUNANGA O NGATI HINE MLC 28 Taitokerau MB 217 6 October 2011 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT 28 Taitokerau MB 217 (28 TTK 217) A20110008223 A20110008445 UNDER Sections 19, 26C and 98, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Determination of dispute between Te Runanga o Ngati Hine and Te Runanga a Iwi o Ngapuhi BETWEEN TE RUNANGA O NGATI HINE Applicant Hearing: 5-6 October 2011 (Heard at Whangarei)

7. Director-General of Conservation [pdf, 467 KB]

   ...Conservation Appellant AND Waikato Regional Council Respondent NOTICE OF APPEAL BY THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION Dated: 8 July 2020 Department of Conservation Solicitor acting: V Tumai Email: vtumai@doc.govt.nz Telephone: 027 536 6862 mailto:vtumai@doc.govt.nz 1 Notice of appeal to Environment Court against decision on the Proposed Waikato Regional Council Plan Change 1: Waikato and Waipā River Catchments Clause 14(1) of Schedule 1, Resource Management...

8. [2014] NZEmpC 207 Canon New Zealand Ltd v Hutchison [pdf, 71 KB]

   ...WELLINGTON [2014] NZEmpC 207 WRC 27/14 IN THE MATTER OF of a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN CANON NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Plaintiff AND BRENT HUTCHISON Defendant EMPC 255/2014 IN THE MATTER OF an application to file challenge out of time BETWEEN BRENT HUTCHISON Applicant AND CANON NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On written submissions filed on 17 and 24 O...

9. [2014] NZEmpC 210 Robinson v Pacific Seals Ltd oral judgement [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...dismissing his challenge to an earlier determination of the Employment Relations Authority. 2 The defendant seeks an additional order of a stay pending payment of any security ordered against the plaintiff. The sum sought by way of security is $5,000. 1 Robinson v Pacific Seals (NZ) Ltd [2014] NZEmpC 99. 2 Robinson v Pacific Seals (NZ) Ltd [2013] NZERA Wellington 101. Security for costs [2] There is no expre...

10. BORA Broadcasting (Games of National Significance) Amendment Bill [pdf, 197 KB]

    ...conclusion, we have considered the consistency of the Bill with s 19 (freedom from discrimination). Our analysis conforms with our previous advice, and is set out below. The Bill 4. The Bill amends the Broadcasting Act 1989 (‘the principal Act’). Clause 4 of the Bill expands the functions of the Broadcasting Commission (‘the Commission’) to include: a. promoting the live broadcast of New Zealand sport; b. promoting sporting games and events of national significance; and c....