5996 items matching your search terms
...REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE BY SOUTH WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL TO BECOME A PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 274 OF THE ACT Dated 28th September 2020 Westpac House 430 Victoria Street PO Box 258 DX GP 20031 Hamilton 3240 New Zealand Ph: (07) 839 4771 Fax: (07) 839 4913 tompkinswake.co.nz Solicitor: Marianne Mackintosh marianne.mackintosh@tompkinswake.co.nz - 1 - TO: The Registrar Environment Court Auckl...
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-101-000028 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 11 BETWEEN RONALD ALOYSIUS WIHELMUS AND MARTINA HELENA MARIA HOOFT VAN HUIJSDUIJNEN Claimants AND EDWARD MERVYN JOHN AND LYNETTE ANNE CATHERINE WOODLEY First Respondents AND PORIRUA CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent AND ALAN GORDON MINTY (Removed) Third Respondent AND SAWREY CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND DONALD JOHN HAWINKELS Fifth Respo
...Inability to obtain legal representation ………………………….. Effects on others ……………………………………………………….... Merits of proposed challenge …………………………………………… Clause 12A tests ………………………………………………… What are frivolous and/or vexatious proceedings? …………....... [37] [40] [42] [44] [69] Decision ………………………………………...
...MATCHITT APPLICANT AND RICHARD JOHN BUTLER, THOMAS HENRY BUTLER, STEWART JAMES BUTLER, TUIHANA POOK, MAURA HIONA ROBSON AND MOANA PAREHUIA WAITITI AS TRUSTEES OF MATANGAREKA 3B TRUST Respondents Hearing: 18 November 2017, 153 Waiariki MB 59-72 24 November 2017, 153 Waiariki MB 127-202 08 February 2017, 159 Waiariki MB 17-93 (Heard at Rotorua) Appearances: T Wara for Applicant C Bidois for Respondents Judgment: 12 June 2018 FINA...
STEPHEN ROACH v NAZARETH CARE CHARITABLE TRUST BOARD NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2017] NZEmpC 165 [21 December 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2017] NZEmpC 165 EMPC 169/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN STEPHEN ROACH Plaintiff AND NAZARETH CARE CHARITABLE TRUST BOARD Defendant Hearing: 13 November 2017 Appearances: J Goldstein, counsel for the plaintiff
...distribution should be on a shareholding basis or not. Mr Owens is recorded as stating that owners have the right to decide which option they preferred. It is also clear that he expressed a desire that the distribution be made on the day. [22] Clause 3(b)(x) of the trust order states:9 To distribute Subject to their being satisfied that proper provision has been made for reserves as referred to in clause 3(b)(vi) hereof to distribute to the beneficial owners in accordance with...
...sold and, subject to adjustment for the earlier repayment of Ms Jacobsen’s mother’s mortgage, Ms Jacobsen’s mother and VAL divided the net proceeds in the proportions of 80:20. [15] Although the Deed of Settlement contained a confidentiality clause, one of Ms Jacobsen’s brothers complained to the Law Society. Ms Jacobsen’s mother filed a supporting email to the effect that although she was prevented from complaining because of the confidentiality clause, she supported her...
...21 November 2019. [4] On 2 March 2020, Mr Simpson advised the Corporation that he was working for Discovery River Cruises Limited, and he had been working six days a week for about 6 to 8 hours per day up to the date of his incapacity. [5] The Corporation received information from IRD that Mr Simpson, who was then aged 76 years, had been receiving a pension, but had not declared any earnings from employment for the period from 2018 to 2020. [6] On 28 April 2020, the Corpor...
...Appearances: C Leaf for the Appellant L Hawes-Gandar for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 8 April 2024 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for loss of potential earnings - s 105, Schedule 1, clause 47(1), Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 6 January 2022. The Reviewer dismissed the application for review of the Corporation’s decision...
...company’s client, a Government department, to provide asset management and maintenance services. His responsibilities included acquiring, managing and coordinating what was described as “third-party contractors” and overseeing quality control. [5] The employment agreement between Downer and Mr King imposed contractual obligations on him which included: (a) not taking any action intended or likely to adversely affect Downer’s business or reputation; (b) to comply with th...