5996 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1375 APPLICANT (respondent in counterclaim) IX Group Limited RESPONDENT UU Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT (applicant in counterclaim) OADN Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: IX Group Limited is to pay OADN Limited $5,459.63 by Friday 30 October 2020. IX Group Limited’s claim is dismissed. Reason
...defendant seeks a contribution to its costs in the sum of $7,500, which is claimed to be 66 percent of the actual costs incurred (totalling $10,348). 4 Mr Ryan (counsel for the plaintiff) submits that costs should lie where they fall. [6] Clause 19, Schedule 3, of the Act confers a broad discretion as to costs. It provides that: The court in any proceedings may order any party to pay to any other party such costs and expenses ... as the court thinks reasonable. [7] The disc...
...accept the explanation, and declined the residence application. [7] The Registrar identified potential infringements of professional standards during the course of Mr E’s engagement, the allegations were that potentially: [7.1] Mr E breached clause 1 of the Licensed Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2014 (the 2014 Code). Clause 1 required him to be honest, professional, diligent and respectful, and conduct himself in a timely manner. The particulars of the alleged breach wer...
...(ENV-2018-CHC-69) Appellant QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Hearing: In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Decision: 14 December 2020 Date of Issue: 14 December 2020 DECISION AS TO COSTS A: Under s285 of the Resource Management Act 1991 , there is no order as to costs. REASONS Introduction (1] This proceeding concerns an appeal by Mr M J Beresford against a decision of the Queenstown Lakes District Council ('QLDC&#...
...of the employment agreement is attached). 3. The employment agreement was signed by the Defendant on 1 May 2019 and signed by the Plaintiff on 3 May 2019. 4. The Plaintiff was asked to attend a meeting with the Defendant on 28 June 2019. 5. During the meeting, the Plaintiff was given a letter. The contents of the letter was read to the Plaintiff during the meeting (a copy of the letter is attached). 6. Payment of the Plaintiff's final pay, including payment in lieu of his...
...conclusion, we have considered the consistency of the Bill with: a. s 11 (right to refuse to undergo medical treatment); b. s 18 (freedom of movement); and c. s 19 (freedom from discrimination). 4. Our analysis is set out below. The Bill 5. The Bill amends the COVID-19 Public Health Response Act (‘the principal Act’) with the aim of supporting a public health response to COVID-19 that is economically sustainable. 6. The Bill provides a framework that would allow the governm...
1 (1) PERMANENT ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF REDACTIONS MADE TO EMAILS DATED 15 APRIL 2016 AND 18 APRIL 2016 (2) PERMANENT ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS AND ANY OTHER IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF SERVICE USERS OTHER THAN PLAINTIFF (3) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE CHAIRPERSON OR OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2019] NZHRRT 53 Reference No. HRRT 029/2018 UNDER T
...77(2A)(b) provides that JS is included in the type of benefit referred to in s 77(2)(a). [10] The Social Security (Effect of Absence of Beneficiary from New Zealand) Regulations 2013 (the Regulations) are given effect by s 132 of the Act. Clause 5 of the Regulations sets out permitted reasons for absence from New Zealand. Clause 7 of the Regulations provides qualifying circumstances for discretionary payment of certain benefits during an absence of longer than four weeks per ye...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 35 ACR 223/17 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN IVAN STRYDER Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Judgment: 10 March 2022 DECISION OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Leave to Appeal] Introduction [1] This is an application for
...Decision: 12 May 2023 Date of Issue: 12 May 2023 _______________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AS TO COSTS _______________________________________________________________ 2 A: Under s285 RMA,1 Dr Cossens is to pay costs to Queenstown Lakes District Council in the sum of $1,700.00. B: If necessary, under s286 RMA this order may be filed with the District Court at Queenstown for enforcement purposes. REASONS Introduc...