5996 items matching your search terms
...of wage increases that were greater than those settled for union members under the collective agreement. [2] The Authority, in a determination issued on 28 February 2013, concluded that Pact Group (Pact), a social services provider, breached a clause of its collective agreement with the two unions (to which I will refer as SFWU and PSA). 2 The 1 Service Food Workers’ Union Nga Ringa Tota Inc v Pact Group [2013] NZERA Christchurch...
...by a number of experts. Mr Keightley appeared for the Real Estate Agents Authority. His evidence was very simple. He considered that an auction could be cancelled at any time because of the provisions of the auction agreement and in particular Clause 2.5. He said that the correct position would have been to have used the auction form (deleting what was not necessary) to record Mr Sinclair’s offer. He said that he would have asked Mr Sinclair to sign an agreement which was condition...
...says that Ms BD had come to see him because she “would like to make specific changes to her will”. His note records the results of title searches he carried out for her, and her instructions to him regarding her family, and asset position. [5] Mr EG’s file notes record a phone conversation he had with Ms BD on 18 July 2011 explaining he had concerns about the 2004 draft, and the lack of clear provision for HH. He recorded his concerns, including the absence of a guardian app...
...was a question as to whether Ms Deng adequately evaluated the case for applying for residence when lodging the application. [4] After the application was lodged, Ms Deng failed to respond to concerns that Immigration New Zealand had identified. [5] Ms Deng failed to notify Mr Muneez promptly when his application was declined. [6] When Mr Muneez complained he received information that suggested that he could not immediately lodge a complaint with the Authority. [7] Ms Deng has admitte...
...repayments from the appellant’s Special Benefit was made on 21 May 2015 when the appellant was living in XXXX [22] The appellant was living in . XXXX 1 See definition of “allowable costs” in clause 2.1 of the Direction. on 21 August 2015 when the car repayments were first excluded from his Special Benefit. 6 [23] By the time the decision was made to further reduce his Special Benefit in October 2015, he had retur...
...Bloor for the applicants correctly acknowledged, his clients did not follow this process.12 They did not file a requisition with the trustees signed by no fewer than eight owners seeking a time and place for the convening of a general meeting. Clause 6 (i)i provides that where the trustees failed to convene a meeting then any owner may apply to the Court per ss 238 and 68 of the Trustee Act 1956. 9 Smith v Smith – Nuki o Te...
...sum of $8,244.98 on or before 22 May 2024. 2. To the extent not reflected in the above order, the claim and counterclaim are dismissed. Reasons: 1. TX and UX engaged XC Ltd to do work on a deck at their property. 2. An estimate of $23,571.00 inclusive GST was given to carry out the work. When demolition of concrete stairs was taken into account, the estimate for work was $27,971.45 inclusive GST. 3. During work on the deck, the design of the stairs was changed from a straig...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 788 APPLICANT S Ltd RESPONDENT CD SECOND RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: K Ltd and CD are jointly and severally liable to pay S Ltd $4,722.18 on or before Friday 1 December 2023. Reasons: 1. In October 2021 S Ltd opened a trade account for K Ltd, which was personally guaranteed by the majority shareholder fo
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 513 APPLICANT BC RESPONDENT J Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT M Insurance The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. BC’s home is situated on [City]’s peninsula, and part of his home is described as a boatshed with a slipway. The slipway was damaged in a storm and in July 2022 BC lodged a damage
...AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent REBUTTAL EVIDENCE OF ANDREW BROWN ON BEHALF OF MANA WHENUA IN SUPPORT OF AC36 Rob Enright Barrister Magdalene Chambers Level 1, 28 Customs St East Britomart Auckland m: 021 2765787 e: rob@publiclaw9.com 3295 mailto:rob@publiclaw9.com 1 Scope of Rebuttal 1.1 My name is Andrew Brown. I have the qualifications and experience stated in my primary evidence. I confirm that I have complied with the Expert Code of...