Search Results

1. Green – Trustees of Te Kou Tiaki and Tangi Ataahua Green Whanau Trust (2014) 92 Waiariki MB 183 (92 WAR 183) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...the said land to accord the wishes of the donor that all her children should share equally. The question of succession is complicated by the existence of two Wills of which only the later in time was probated. That Will did not contain a revocation clause which raises a presumption that the earlier Will still continued in force. Correspondence from the solicitor for the estate clearly indicates that a compromise was reached amongst the beneficiaries whereby this Orete block was to be ve...

2. Record of Pre-Hearing Conference (dated 14 March 2017) [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...pre-hearing conference 31 parties gave notice withdrawing from the appeal (see attached list labelled A). With the exception of Mr Onley, their withdrawal from the appeal is recorded, and they will receive no further communication from the court. [5] Mr Onley has given notice withdrawing from the appeal. The representative for Blueskin Amenity and Landscape Society Inc, Mr Barratt, advised Mr Onley wished to reconsider the matter. I will make a direction for Mr Onley to confirm his...

3. Lisale v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal) [2022] NZACC 228 [pdf, 205 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 228 ACR 251/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT PURSUANT TO SECTION 162 OF THE ACT BETWEEN TIMOTHY LISALE Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: B Hinchcliff for the Applicant F Becroft for the Respondent

4. Financial Sector (Climate-related Disclosures and other matters) Amendment Bill [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...with the rights and freedoms affirmed in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (the Bill of Rights Act). 2. We have not yet received a final version of the Bill. This advice has been prepared in relation to the latest version of the Bill (PCO 22563/10.0). We will provide you with further advice if the final version includes amendments that affect the conclusions in this advice. 3. We have concluded that the Bill appears to be consistent with the rights and freedoms affirmed in the Bil...

5. Acoustic (dated 6 June 2017) [pdf, 308 KB]

   ...We agree that NZS 6808:2010 provides appropriate criteria and assessment methods for this wind farm, acknowledging the Standard includes provisions that recognise areas of high acoustic amenity. 9. We have given regard to the matters raised in clause 5.3.1 of NZS 6808 as to whether a high amenity noise limit should apply. The operative district plan noise maps do not designate the area as having high acoustic amenity as the night-time noise limit is set at 40 dB LA10, which does n...

6. Motiti Avocados Limited Submissions - 5 December 2017 [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...ENVIRONMENT'COURT AT AUCKLAND ENV-2016-348-040 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) AND IN THE MATTER of appeals pursuant to clause 14 of the First Schedule to the Act BETWEEN MOTITI ROHE MOANA TRUST (ENV-2015-AKL-134) NGATI MAKINO HERITAGE TRUST (ENV-2015-AKL-140) NGATI RANGINUI IWI INCORPORATED SOCIETY (ENV-2015-AKL-141) Appellants A N D BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent AND Various Section 274 parties SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF...

7. 2020-12-07 Statement of Evidence of Tom de Pelsemaeker on behalf of the ORC [pdf, 938 KB]

   ...Water Regional Plan (LWRP), to be notified by 31 December 2023. 7 I was involved in the review of the draft of proposed Plan Change 7 to the Water Plan (PC7) that was prepared for the purpose of undertaking pre-notification consultation under clause 3 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA). I provided input into the preparation of the Section 32 Evaluation Report that was prepared for PC7. 8 I have been asked by the Council to prepare planning evidence for these...

8. [2022] NZEmpC 171 Alkazaz v Deloitte (No. 3) Ltd [pdf, 356 KB]

   AHMED ALKAZAZ v DELOITTE (NO. 3) LIMITED (formerly known as ASPARONA LIMITED) [2022] NZEmpC 171 [15 September 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 171 EMPC 130/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN AHMED ALKAZAZ Plaintiff AND DELOITTE (NO. 3) LIMITED (formerly known as ASPARONA LIMITED) Fi

9. [2015] NZSSAA 022, 2 April [pdf, 26 KB]

   [2015] NZSSAA 022 Reference No. SSA 069/14 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Lady Tureiti Moxon - Member DECISION ON THE PAPERS Introduction [1] The appellant appeals against a decision of the Chief Executive upheld by a Benefits Review

10. Elisara v Aasa [2014] NZIACDT 90 (16 September 2014) [pdf, 126 KB]

    ...amounted to a breach of the Code of Conduct 2010 (failure to carry out lawful informed instructions with care diligence and professionalism (clause 1.1(b) of the Code)); and [3.4] She failed to report as required (clause 3(a) of the Code). [3.5] The full factual circumstances are set out in the substantive decision. The Parties’ Positions on Sanctions The Authority [4] The Authority did not make any submissions on sanctions. The complainant [5] The complainant sought a refund...