Search Results

1. Marywil Investments Ltd v North Shore Ctiy Council [pdf, 21 KB]

   ...out the building work. Summary of Facts • 1993: Apex, as previous owners, engaged Butt Design Ltd to prepare drawings and specifications • 28 February 1994: a building consent was issued based on those drawings • February 1994-February 1995: the house was constructed with the Council carrying out inspections • Apex contracted Famkanco to provide labour-only building work. Famkanco was not in control of the site nor did it have any supervisory responsibilities for the sub- t...

2. KT & TE v B Ltd [2021] NZDT 1650 (12 November 2021) [pdf, 91 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1650 APPLICANT KT and TE RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay the sum of $457.00 to KT and TE on or before Friday 26 November 2021. Reasons: 1. On 29 June 2021, the applicants made a booking through [Travel company C] for three adults to stay on 19 August 2021 at the [Hotel D] in [City A], a

3. X Ltd v LG [2023] NZDT 358 (28 July 2023) [pdf, 95 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 358 APPLICANT X Ltd RESPONDENT LG The Tribunal orders: LG as trustee of LB is to pay X Ltd $6781.55 by 18 August 2023. Reasons Introduction: 1. X Ltd was contracted by LB trustees to provide forest operations and management services for the harvest of forestry at LB’s property at [address]. 2. X Ltd car

4. GD v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 351 (22 April 2024) [pdf, 202 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 351 APPLICANT GD RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: T Ltd is to pay GD $920.00 on or before 31 May 2024. Reasons: 1. GD accepted an estimate from T Ltd to undertake painting work on the outside of her rental property in [city]. GD paid a deposit of $5,034.13. Before work started GD cancelled the work and asked for her deposit ba

5. [2022] NZEmpC 136 The Board of Trustees of Southland Boys High School v Jackson [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...following remedies awarded to each of the defendants: (a) The sum of $28,000 under s 123(1)(c)(i) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act); and (b) lost remuneration calculated in accordance with three months’ ordinary time (totalling $25,679.42) plus interest.2 [3] The Board was dissatisfied with the Authority’s determination and filed a non- de novo challenge. The scope of the matters at issue on the challenge, as particularised in the plaintiff’s statement of claim,...

6. Albert v Winitana - Heiotahoka 2B, Te Kopani 36 and Te Kopani 37 Ahu Whenua Trust (2015) 52 Tairawhiti MB 136 (52 TRW 136) - (PDF, 212 KB) [pdf, 212 KB]

   52 Tairawhiti MB 136 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRAWHITI DISTRICT A20140011164 A20150001632 UNDER Section 231, 238 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Heiotahoka 2B, Te Kopani 36 & Te Kopani 37 Ahu Whenua Trust VICTORIA MARY ANN ALBERT Applicant A20150002231 UNDER Section 240 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Heiotahoka 2B, Te Kopani 36 & Te Kopani 37 Ahu Whenua Trust

7. Complaints Assessment Committee 413 v Marr [2019] NZREADT 008 [pdf, 334 KB]

   ...children, in breach of the agency’s internal protocol (particular (b)); [d] forged the signature of the vendor, Ms Guttenbeil, on that agreement for sale and purchase (particular (e)); [e] unilaterally added a “contemporaneous settlement” clause to that agreement for sale and purchase (particular (f)); [f] created a further sale and purchase agreement, dated 9 August 2013, which specified a purchase price and deposit which were greater than the actual purchase price and...

8. [2020] NZEmpC 61 Leota v Parcel Express Ltd [pdf, 465 KB]

   ...procedures manuals or written or verbal instruction.” (cl 4.3) Mr Leota was not at liberty to exercise any control over the times and days on which his work was to be performed. In this regard cl 6.1 provided: Subject to the provisions of this clause the Contractor will personally perform his/her services under this Agreement at such times and on such days as the Company may require. … [24] Mr Leota could not exceed 20 working days’ holiday in any 12-month period without t...

9. Hartley v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claim for cost of treatment) [2023] NZACC 200 [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...concluded that he had no unifying diagnosis for the multitude of symptoms that Ms Hartley had, but noted that she was quite distressed by these symptoms. Dr Anthony suggested that Ms Hartley might have post-infection chronic fatigue symptoms. [5] On 11 May 2019, Dr Jan Schepel, Neurologist, reported that, since the injury, Ms Hartley had been overwhelmed by severe fatigue, nausea, and other symptoms. Dr Schepel’s impression was of a mild head injury with post-concussion symptoms,...

10. J v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2022] CEIT-2019-0068 [pdf, 530 KB]

    ...AUSTRALIA LIMITED Third Respondent AND HFC CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL (SOUTH) LIMITED Fourth Respondent (REMOVED) AND AND CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Fifth Respondent STAKE CONSULTING LTD Sixth Respondent Date: Hearings: 3-5 August 2021 (openings and witnesses) 30 September 2021 (closings) Appearances: T Brown and M Borcoski (3-5 August) for applicants B Cuff and M Booth for the Second Respondent G Carter for the Third Respondent M Cavanaugh f...