Search Results

1. [2018] NZEmpC 93 Jacks Hardware and Timber Ltd v First Union Inc [pdf, 360 KB]

   ...AS TO ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE Introduction [1] This judgment resolves an application for admissibility of evidence contained in witness statements which have been filed for the purposes of a substantive hearing scheduled to commence on 15 August 2018. [2] The particular issue which is raised is whether Jacks Hardware and Timber Ltd (Jacks Hardware) can lead evidence of certain statements made in the course of facilitations that were conducted by the Employment Relations Auth...

2. AZ v MX [2015] NZIACDT 75 (22 June 2015) [pdf, 130 KB]

   BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 75 Reference No: IACDT 041/14 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN A Z Complainant AND M X Adviser DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Ms K England, lawyer, MBIE, Auckland. Complainant:

3. [2015] NZSSAA 44 (1 July 2015) [pdf, 35 KB]

   [2015] NZSSAA 044 Reference No. SSA 119/14 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member HEARING at WELLINGTON on 11 February 2015 APPEARANCES The appellant in person Mr R Dennett for the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development DECISION

4. SB v MT LCRO 30 / 2011 (23 October 2012) [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...in time before it reached a decision. Background [2] The relevant background is that the Practitioner acted for a landlord who leased two adjacent commercial properties to two tenants under Deeds of Lease. These leases contained the usual clause providing for the tenant to meet the landlord’s legal costs. The tenants agreed, with the consent of the landlord, to swap premises. The Practitioner prepared the relevant documents and issued his invoices, but one of the 2 t...

5. 2017 NZSSAA 058 (10 October 2017) [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...category of relief, the interest earned on the lump sum was not sufficient to trigger the income test. Pursuant to s 124(1)(d) of the Act the minister established the special needs grant programme. The programme is subject to an asset test in clause 8. It is the same as that for temporary additional support; cash assets must not exceed $1,050.92. The special needs grant programme contains a definition of “cash assets” in clause 3; it includes bank accounts and other similar typ...

6. [2018] NZEnvC 118 Hamilton City Council [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...satisfaction of the Council to ensure compliance with Rule 3.7.4.3.2 [103] If a control such as this was in place, we would be satisfied that the proposal is consistent with Policy 3.7.3.4 d.v, Policy 3.7.3.4 e and Rule 3.7.4.3.2, and all the other sub­ clauses of Policy 3.7.3.4 d. [4] We concluded: Conditions [151] In our view, the conditions proposed by the Council and TGH improve the overall situation for residents in the Percival/Ryburn enclave. We are satisfied that they are ap...

7. Ballance Agri-Nutrients Limited.pdf [pdf, 682 KB]

   ...provisions of PC1 to which this appeal relates. 3. BAN is not a trade competitor for the purposes of section 308C or 308CA of the RMA. 4. BAN has an interest in the following parts of the proceedings: (a) Objective 2; and (b) Schedule D1. 5. BAN supports the relief sought by Dairy NZ to Objective 2 and Schedule D1. Objective 2 (Freshwater Objective) 5.1 Dairy NZ notes that Objective 2 sets the target of achieving Table 3.11-1 attribute states within 10 years. The attribu...

8. King Country Energy Limited.pdf [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...which this appeal relates. 3. KCE is not a trade competitor for the purposes of section 308C or 308CA of the RMA. 4. KCE has an interest in the following parts of the proceedings: (a) Objectives 1, 2 & Table 3.11-1 (c) Policy 12 5. KCE opposes the relief sought by DoC to Objectives 1, 2 & Table 3.11-1, and to Policy 12. Objectives 1, 2 & Table 3.11-1 5.1 The decisions version of Objective 1 states that “In relation to the effects of nitrogen, phosphorus,...

9. IQ Ltd & Ors v ND Ltd [2023] NZDT 638 (11 October 2023) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...RESPONDENT ND Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is struck out for lack of jurisdiction. Reasons: 1. IQ Ltd (herein Owners) filed this claim against ND Ltd on behalf of 2 of its members, US and DF, seeking a refund of $9,474.25 they jointly paid to ND Ltd for SUIP rates, whom Owners assert were coerced by ND Ltd to pay or the sale of their lot would be blocked. 2. Owners then filed another claim for 2 more members over separate SUIP rates charged by ND Ltd....

10. SQ v KL & L Ltd [2023] NZDT 180 (22 June 2023) [pdf, 196 KB]

    ...180 APPLICANT SQ RESPONDENT KL SECOND RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by SQ against KL is dismissed. 2. The claim by SQ against L Ltd is proved and L Ltd is to pay SQ the sum of $13,820.00 on or by 5:00 pm on 15 July 2023. 3. The counterclaim by L Ltd against SQ is dismissed. Reasons 1. SQ entered into a contract with L Ltd for the construction of a dwelling. SQ now brings a claim against L Ltd for $13,820.00. L Ltd counterclaims...