Search Results

1. [2018] NZEmpC 92 Ovation v NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union [pdf, 295 KB]

   ...remain in breach of Part 6D of the Act; that donning and doffing is “work” within the meaning of the Minimum Wage Act 1983 and Part 6D of the Act; and that compliance and appropriate orders as to arrears should be made. [6] The particular clause in the counterclaim for which the further and better particulars are sought states: 17.2.4 The plaintiffs also require work to be performed during breaks in the form of doffing and stowing and sterilizing equipment and gear and donni...

2. M (C M Trust) v Tower Insurance Ltd [2019] CEIT-2019-0012 [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...Notes to cooperate in advancing these claims to resolution. [4] Section 40 of the CEIT Act empowers the Tribunal to act in an inquisitorial way when determining claims. That wide power is subject to a requirement to observe natural justice. [5] Part of this statutorily established approach to the determination of claims is the need to ensure that claims are progressed expeditiously and cooperatively without unnecessary delay caused by interlocutory applications. [6] That said...

3. Criminal Cases Review Commission Bill: Approval for Introduction [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...have occurred in a criminal case, the Royal prerogative of mercy can be exercised to grant a free pardon, or refer a person’s conviction or sentence to the relevant appeal court under section 406(1) of the Crimes Act 1961 for a further appeal. 5 As agreed by Cabinet, the Commission will perform the referral function currently exercised by the Governor-General under section 406 of the Crimes Act 1961. While the Governor-General would continue to exercise the Royal prerogative of mercy,...

4. The Maori Trustee v Erueti - Succession to Momona Tamihana (2022) 448 Aotea MB 63 (448 AOT 63) [pdf, 229 KB]

   448 Aotea MB 63 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District A20200011162 WĀHANGA Under Section 165, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Succession to Momona Tamihana I WAENGA I A Between THE MĀORI TRUSTEE Te Kaitono Applicant ME And LARA ERUETI Te Kaiurupare Respondent Nohoanga: Hearing 20 July 2021, 435 Aotea MB 2

5. [2022] NZEnvC 011 Clutha District Council v Vreugdenhil Family Trust Partnership [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...Council (‘the Council’) to stop part of a road1 following public notification of the proposal2 as required by the road stopping provision in s342(1)(a) and Schedule 10 of the Local Government Act 1974 (‘LGA’). [2] Pursuant to Schedule 10 clause 2-5 of the LGA, the Council publicly notified the proposed stopping, which was met with six objections in opposition. Although some of the objections were allowed, the Council subsequently resolved to refer the proposed stopping o...

6. Discussion paper - Re-evaluation of Human Rights protections [pdf, 534 KB]

   Ministry of Justice Te Manatu Ture Discussion Paper Re-evaluation of the Human Rights Protections in New Zealand RE-EVALUATION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTIONS IN NEW ZEALAND REPORT FOR THE ASSOCIATE MINISTER OF JUSTICE AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL HON. MARGARET WILSON 3 DISCLAIMER The Ministerial Re-evaluation of Human Rights Protections in New Zealand was written by an independent evaluation team for the Minister of Justice. The views expressed in it are those of the independent evalua

7. Ali v Wang [2015] NZIACDT 50 (13 May 2015) [pdf, 208 KB]

   BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 50 Reference No: IACDT 013/12 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Afrez Tasheef Ali Complainant AND Zhirong (Gordon) Wang Adviser DECISION IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS REPRESENTATION:

8. DV v RG LCRO 141/2015 (28 June 2016) [pdf, 79 KB]

   LCRO 141/2015 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of a Standards Committee BETWEEN DV Applicant AND RG Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Ms DV has applied for a review of a decision by a Standards Committee, in which the Committee decided that no action w

9. [2016] NZEmpC 149 NZ Education Institute Te Riu Roa v Secretary for Education [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...of the agreement, and Appendix D, in some detail in the August judgment. [18] Although the annualisation provisions are set out in some detail, the question of commencement of the period of annualisation is referred to expressly in only one clause, cl 2(c) of Appendix D, which states: Initial commencement of annualisation (i) … (ii) Any period of annualisation must begin at the start of pay period 23 (i.e. the pay period that begins closest to February 1 st ) in any year an...

10. Greyling v Gimranov [2016] NZIACDT 55 (15 September 2016) [pdf, 216 KB]

    BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2016] NZIACDT 55 Reference No: IACDT 047/15. IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Marthinus Greyling Complainant AND Sergey Gimranov Adviser DECISION (SANCTIONS) REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Ms C Pendleto