Leef v Leef - Panguru A47B (2015) 113 Taitokerau MB 11 (113 TTK 11) [pdf, 250 KB]
...event, the purchase price is not an issue in this case. What is important is that the agreement provided that the house was to be removed. [28] Although the agreement does not expressly stipulate the date by which the house was to be removed, clause 3 contemplates that it was to be disconnected from all services within 30 days and that within the fifth working day after the building had been removed, the site was to be cleared (clause 5). Importantly, clause 2.1 stipulated among o...