6000 items matching your search terms
...8,388.16 • Consultants fees 1,330.00 • Legal fees 16,000.00 • Diminution of property value 58,500.00 $ 151,323.41 3.5 The claims against Ms Stewart are for breach of clause 6.2(5) of the Sale and Purchase Agreement. In general terms, by this clause Ms Stewart warranted that all building work that was carried whilst she was the owner, was carried out with an appropriate building consent, and all the work c...
...Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Plaintiff AND RAKAI TAWHIWHIRANGI Defendant Hearing: Written submissions received 24 October, 5 and 9 November 2007 Judgment: 10 March 2008 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C M SHAW [1] The defendant seeks two orders of costs following his successful defence of the plaintiff’s challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations...
KANA SHANMUGANATHAN v POWERNET LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 160 [17 September 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 160 EMPC 285/2014 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN KANA SHANMUGANATHAN Plaintiff AND POWERNET LIMITED Defendant Hearing: (on the papers by submissions filed on 27 July and 11 August 2015) Counsel: M Thomas, c
421 Aotea MB 140 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE WAIARIKI In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District A20200005515 WĀHANGA Under Section 215, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Rangitatau Waitōtara 3F1 and Rangitatau Waitōtara 3A REECE EVAN PRITCHARD, RAUMARIHI ROSE TE PEKE, WIREMU PAORA TOWNSEND AND TERRENCE LEO JACKSON Ngā Kaitono Applicants Nohoanga: Hearing 420 Ao
...CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS Introduction [1] The defendant has applied for costs against the plaintiff, following an unsuccessful challenge 1 to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority. 2 [2] The defendant seeks an award of $7,500 (plus GST) in respect of her costs on the plaintiff’s challenge; $4,500 (plus GST) by way of contribution to costs in the Authority; and costs of $1,500 (plus GST) for attendance at an unsuccessful mediation. Mr Single, advocate for...
...at Reotahi, there is a line shown approximately to the top of the ridgeline as the cut-off point, and again there are some houses already constructed and obviously subdivisions allowing further development in the future. Subsequent progress [5] Northport indicated in its submission that it intended to do further work on the noise rules, and the Council retained an expert (Mr J Styles, an acoustic consultant) who commented that there was a lack of full information in relation to th...
...THE TRIBUNAL ____________________________________________________________________ [1] Ms Saywell and Barfoot & Thompson were found guilty of unsatisfactory conduct by the Complaints Assessment Committee and found to be in breach of Rules 5.1, 6.2, 6.4 and 10.7 of the Client Care Rules (2012). [2] As a result of these findings Ms Saywell was censured and fined $2,000 and Barfoot & Thompson was censured and fined $2,500. [3] Both appeal these decisions in whole or pa...
...has set out the appropriate statutory provisions and previous legal authority to support this. [27] Accordingly, the freezing order on the terms contained in the draft, submitted with the application, is made with some amendment. Insofar as clause 5 of the order is made, I do not see the need to limit the freezing order to a total value of no more than $200,000. It would seem to me to be a figure which would be insufficient to cover the potential liability to the employe...
...sole trader builder who had incurred a substantial tax liability prior to separation and that tax liability was unknown at the date of separation. In the Agreement, Mr and Mrs YH agreed that they would each share equally in the tax liability. [5] Mr YH calculated that Mrs YH was indebted to him in the sum of $164,875 plus interest and costs pursuant to this clause and issued proceedings in 2011 against her for this amount. [6] In the meantime, Mr YH had defaulted in payments of chil...
QTN PLAN APPEALS – TOPIC 2 – INTERIM DECISION 2.11 IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 154 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN UPPER CLUTHA ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2018-CHC-56) and all other appellants concerning Topic 2 of Stage 1 of the Proposed Queenstown Lakes District Plan (listed on the