Search Results

1. Protection-of-Personal-and-Property-Rights_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 713 KB]

   I N C O N F I D E N C E 1 I N C O N F I D E N C E 6rfh54cgzi 2024-09-04 14:24:47 [IN-CONFIDENCE] Office of the Minister of Justice Social Outcomes Committee Updating the Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act property thresholds and Public Trust’s Private Manager Examination fee Proposal 1 This paper seeks Cabinet’s agreement to amend the Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 (PPPR Act) and Protection of Personal and Property Rights Regul

2. [2007] NZEmpC WC 20A/07 Gaskin v Grenside [pdf, 32 KB]

   ...Mr Grenside’s advertisement of his application for a passenger service licence was published in the public notices section of the Dominion Post newspaper. The notice called for any objections to be sent to the regional transport advisor. [5] Mr Gaskin saw the public notice and sent an objection by e-mail to Land Transport New Zealand (LTNZ) with a copy to Richard Wright who had assisted Mr Grenside to lodge his application. In that notice of objection, Mr Gaskin made serious a...

3. [2011] NZEmpC 70 Telecom New Zealand Limited v Long published version [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...Technology (IT) role with Telecom’s division known as Gen-i. During that time he was responsible exclusively for a major account customer (which will be described as “AB”). The AB IT account is one of the largest in Telecom’s portfolio. [5] For about the last 18 months it has been known to Telecom that AB intends to put out to tender a substantial proportion of its telecommunications IT work from November 2011 when AB’s current contract with Telecom concludes. Telecom i...

4. Martin - Whangaroa Ngaiotonga Trust (2008) 127 Whangarei MB 144 (127 WH 144) [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   127 Whangarei MB 144 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND T AITOKERAU DISTRICT A20070001484 UNDER Section 238, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 Hearing: Judgment: Introduction IN THE MATTER OF Whangaroa Ngaiotonga Trust 25 July 2007 (Heard at Whangarei) 26 September 2008 CHRISTOPHER MARTIN Applicant RESERVED JUDGMENT OF D J AMBLER [1] The COUlt has before it an application by Chris Martin to enforce the obligations of the Whangaroa Ngaiotonga Trust ("the Trust&

5. Kaire - Ngararatunua A2B3 (2007) 118 Whangarei MB 123 (118 WH 123) [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ..."A" on the proposed partition plan filed in favour of Ngararatunua A2B3C and in respect of area "B" on the proposed partion plan in favour of Ngararatunua A2B3A and Ngararatunua A2B3C, with the rights and powers implied by clauses 1, 2, 6 and 10 to 13 (but excluding all others) of Schedule 4 of the Land Transfer Regulations 2002. (d) Pursuant to section 73 of the Act the above orders are conditional upon the following occurring within six months: (1) The Cour...

6. MD v O Ltd [2021] NZDT 1347 (27 January 2021) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 that MD was not the contracting party, the loss is not covered by the Act and so too O Limited cannot be held liable for the actions of its employees related to such loss. 19. O Limited provided the relevant clause of its contract with P Limited, which states “These tickets may only be used for returning copies/portions of unsold P Limited Products.” 20. It follows that O Limited cannot be held liable for the loss of MD’s computer. This is p...

7. BC v GT & TT [2022] NZDT 134 (31 August 2022) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...his claim against them. TT said that his mother was elderly and her health was such that she could not appear at the hearing, and he appeared both for himself and as her representative. [2] BC provided a copy of the sale and purchase agreement. Clause 21 states that Notwithstanding that all EQC repair work has been completed to the property, the vendor agrees to, with effect from the settlement date, assign to the purchaser all the vendor’s remaining interest (if any) in the EQC...

8. SI & XQ v G Ltd [2022] NZDT 40 (14 February 2022) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...primarily because the event could not lawfully take place at the scheduled date. In making this finding I also had regard to the factors set out in the preceding paragraphs, including the terms of the contract and absence of any force majeure type clause or any appreciation at the time of entering the contract that such a significant event would likely impact on the contract. 11. On balance, I also prefer the Applicant’s position that any future event would have been radically diff...

9. St-John-Ambulance-Submissions.pdf [pdf, 270 KB]

   IN THE CORONER’S COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI KAITIROTIRO MATEWHAWHATI KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [I TE TARI] CSU-2019-CCH-000165 CSU-2019-CCH-000166 CSU-2019-CCH-000167 CSU-2019-CCH-000168 CSU-2019-CCH-000169 CSU-2019-CCH-000170 CSU-2019-CCH-000171 CSU-2019-CCH-000172 CSU-2019-CCH-000173 CSU-2019-CCH-000174 CSU-2019-CCH-000175 CSU-2019-CCH-000176 CSU-2019-CCH-000177 CSU-2019-CCH-000178 CSU-2019-CCH-000179 CSU-2019-CCH-000180 CSU-2019-CCH-000181 CSU-2019-CCH-000182

10. DT v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 225 (12 May 2023) [pdf, 169 KB]

    (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 225 APPLICANT DT RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: DT’s claim against T Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The applicant engaged the respondent to dig a trench and provide and drainage services to it in 2019. The applicant paid the respondent a total of $17,720.36 for these services. The applicant claims that after heavy rain in June 2022 and there