Search Results

1. AC v FV & HU LCRO 318/2012 (27 November 2014) [pdf, 50 KB]

   ...was in a position to proceed with the purchase and requested her to prepare the necessary Agreements. They say her advice was that it was the purchaser’s obligation to prepare the Agreements and that they should wait for that to be done. [5] For his part Mr FV advises that the first indication his firm had about the proposed sale was a fax from Mr and Mrs AC’s bank to advise loan repayment figures. [6] The Agreements were prepared by the purchaser’s solicitor (Mr JT) and were...

2. 2018 NZSSAA 006 (25 January 2018) [pdf, 114 KB]

   [2018] NZSSAA 006 Reference No. SSA 056/17 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Auckland against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY S Pezaro - Deputy Chair K Williams - Member Hearing at Auckland on 13 December 2017 Appearances The appellant in person J Burns and A Katona for the Ministry of Social Development DECISION This dec

3. [2019] NZSSAA 11 (8 March 2019) [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...forced by sickness and family circumstances to sell their home. The appellant also pointed out that he endeavoured for some six months to manage without social assistance after he had sold his home. 3 Clause 10 of the Ministerial Direction in relation to Emergency Benefit and Benefits on Ground of Hardship. 5 [20] The appellant produced evidence of his expenses. He explained that he maintained medical insurance despite the...

4. [2021] NZEnvC 071 Box Property Investments Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 421 KB]

   ...Court: Chief Environment Court Judge DA Kirkpatrick sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Last case event: 17 May 2021 Date of Decision: 2 7 MAY 2021 Date of Issue: 2 7 MAY 2021 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AS TO COSTS Under section 285 of the Resource Management Act 1991 the Environment ox Property Investments Limited v Auckland Council 2 Court orders Box Property Investments Limited to pay $100 to each of Reydon Place Residents Association Inc., Cockle Bay Residents a...

5. Ferris v Brown - Nuhiti Q Inc (2023) 117 Tairawhiti MB 216 (117 TRW 216) [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...Māori reservation land. He opined that: Section 19(1)(b) does not contain the explicit reference to Māori land or Māori reservation that [ss] 19(1)(a) and (c)-(d) of the Act contain. However, it is submitted that while “property” in this clause may be interpreted broadly to include monies or other forms of property, as far as land or real property is concerned the Court’s jurisdiction and its powers must be limited to Māori land or Māori reservation [land] as referred to...

6. SG v Accident Compensation Corporation (Lack of Jurisdiction) [2024] NZACC 158 (2 October 2024) [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...2001 THERE IS A SUPPRESSION ORDER FORBIDDING PUBLICATION OF THE APPELLANT’S NAME AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 158 ACAR 185/23 ACAR 253/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN SG Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 13 S...

7. 2021-07-05 Transcript (up until1.30pm of day 39).pdf [pdf, 1.9 MB]

   ...we have voluntarily reduced our water usages over time in order to favour other users on the water scheme, and that has an impact, also, in the calculation of an annual volume limit. 5 Plan change 7, in its present form, in this case, it’s clause 10A.4.4, which is a method for calculating the annual volume limit, if we consider that in its present form, it would render this irrigation system ineffective in a dry summer, and I’m referring not to that clause in the form that it...

8. Bevan v Peakman - Succession to Kathleen Paikea and Hemi Wharepaikea [2024] Chief Judge's MB 212 (2024 CJ 212) [pdf, 360 KB]

   ...Judge's MB 212 (2024 CJ 212) I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O WAIKATO MANIAPOTO In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waikato Maniapoto District AP-20230000027474 A20200011028 CJ 2020/49 WĀHANGA Under Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Succession to Kathleen Paikea and Hemi Wharepaikea also known as Hemi Whare Paikea Te Putu or James Paikea I WAENGA I A Between KATRINA MIRIAMA B...

9. [2009] NZEmpC WC 17/09 Idea Services Ltd v Dickson [pdf, 84 KB]

   ...through which it is given practical effect. Successive Orders have provided not only for minimum rates of wages per 8-hour day or per 40-hour week but, in every case, for each hour worked in addition to those basic entitlements – see, for example, clause 4 of the Minimum Wage Order 2009. [41] In his next broad submission, Mr Quigg cited passages from New Zealand Air Line Pilots Association Inc v Air New Zealand Ltd (No 2) [2008] ERNZ 62 (the NZALPA case), where a full Court consi...

10. M and M v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2019] CEIT-2019-0047 [pdf, 329 KB]

    ...elements, or both.19 [61] A useful publication issued in May 2017 by BRANZ,20 suggests that an applicant for approval of an alternative roofing solution should: (a) identify aspects that fall outside the Acceptable Solution; (b) identify the clause in the Building Code for which performance must be demonstrated by design and supported by information; (c) identify the performance criteria that apply; (d) select the most relevant compliance paths;