Search Results

1. March 2022 Notification of Applications in Office of Chief Registrar [pdf, 418 KB]

   ...outstanding in the office of the Chief Registrar, Wellington March 2022 TAKE NOTICE THAT the following schedule of applications, currently held in the Office of the Chief Registrar in Wellington, are hereby notified, pursuant to rules 3.18, 5.3 and 8.2(3) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011, as being outstanding and have yet to be determined or set down for inquiry or report under section 46 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993. This schedule does not include applications that have...

2. [2017] NZEmpC 28 Rossiter v AFFCO New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for stay of proceedings BETWEEN JOHN ONEPU ROSSITER Plaintiff AND AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: (by memoranda of submissions filed on 7 and 15 December 2016) Appearances: S Mitchell, counsel for the plaintiff M Williams, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 13 March 2017 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 2) OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Introduction [1] T...

3. 5. Transcript (weeks 9 & 10 Dunedin) [pdf, 3 MB]

   ...................................................................................................................... 9 QUESTIONS ARISING – NIL ............................................................................................................. 15 TOM WILLY DE PELSEMAEKER (AFFIRMED) .................................................................................... 16 SALLY ANNE DICEY (AFFIRMED) ........................................................................................

4. [2013] NZEmpC 133 2013 Dolev v Netafim Australia Pty Ltd [pdf, 186 KB]

   ELDAD DOLEV v NETAFIM AUSTRALIA PTY LTD NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2013] NZEmpC [18 July 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2013] NZEmpC 133 CRC 15/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ELDAD DOLEV Plaintiff AND NETAFIM AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Defendant Hearing: 10, 11 and 12 June 2013 Appearances: Mr B A Fletcher, counsel for plaintiff Mr A Russell, couns

5. [2013] NZEmpC 202 Hallwright v Forsyth Barr Ltd [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...replied, advising that he did not believe that the company had misunderstood the situation relating to the circumstances and the outcome of the case, as “the conviction seemed fairly clear”. 10 Clause 17.3.b. 11 Clause 4.6. He reiterated that the forthcoming meeting was an opportunity for Mr Hallwright to comment and for him to listen to his comments. [25] A meeting was held on 15 August 2012. Submissions were mad...

6. [2022] NZEmpC 46 UQE v TBN [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...but to decide whether the Authority made an error of fact and/or law in determining that the company consented to the grievance being pursued out of time and, if so, whether that part of the determination ought to be set aside.3 The facts [5] UQE was party to a collective agreement with a union. TBN was a member of the union and a delegate. February 2019 was marked by a period of industrial unrest. TBN and a number of other employees were invited to attend a disciplinary meetin...

7. Chapman v Aotearoa Resorts Ltd - Tokaanu Māori Township 2nd Residue Trust (2010) 257 Aotea MB 62 (257 AOT 62) [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...before the Court across the span of five years has been the breaches of the leases by the respondents. I now consider the particular claims of the applicants and the respondents’ defences. Payment of rent and related charges Rental [58] Clause 1 of the lease states: “That the lessee will during the term hereby granted pay the yearly rent hereinbefore reserved at the times and in the manner hereinbefore in that behalf mentioned without any deduction.” [59] Mr Paine argues...

8. CAC304 v Morris [2016] NZREADT 4 [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...that the defendant’s denial that that phone call took place is simply not credible. [63] The prosecution accepts that, superficially, the lease agreement has the appearance of being a lease intended to have legal effect, but it is put there are clauses of the agreement that were inaccurate and/or not intended to be complied with. Conversely, it is put that the lease agreement does not provide for what the defendant now says the true circumstances were, such as the fact that renovation...

9. Huata - Koparakore B2B 2C (2017) 62 Tākitimu MB 222 (62 TKT 222) [pdf, 377 KB]

   62 Tākitimu MB 222 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TĀKITIMU DISTRICT A20150004916 A20150004917 UNDER Sections 239 and 244, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Koparakore B2B 2C Block and Others BETWEEN NGATAI HUATA ON BEHALF OF THE WIREMU WI TE TAU HUATA AND RINGAHORA YBELL TOMOANA HUATA WHĀNAU TRUST Applicant A20160003300 UNDER Section 241, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Koparakore B2B

10. Reti - Succession to Jemima Reti [2020] Chief Judges MB 1243 (2020 CJ 1243) [pdf, 335 KB]

    2020 Chief Judge’s MB 1243 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE TAIRĀWHITI In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Tairāwhiti District A20180006207 WĀHANGA Under Sections 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of CJ 2018/29 Jemima Reti and succession order made at 9 Tairāwhiti MB 249-254 on 6 October 2010 I WAENGA I A Between JERRY ATAHERE RETI Te kaitono Applicant Nohoanga: Hearing