Search Results

1. NA v AL LCRO 68 / 2011 (10 April 2012) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...inadequate in many significant ways. When a dispute later arose about whether the premises were in a sufficiently completed state for the Applicants to re-enter and fit out the premises, they turned to the Practitioner for legal assistance. [5] The Practitioner’s initial focus was on achieving agreement as to the terms of re-entry and also the terms of new lease between the parties; disagreements between the parties delayed resolving these matters. The developer eventually can...

2. Hiroti - Estate of Bridget Hiroti [2016] 2016 Chief Judges MB 799 (2016 CJ 799) [pdf, 233 KB]

   2016 Chief Judge’s MB 799 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20110003164 CJ 2011/37 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Estate of Bridget (Pirihita) Hiroti also known as Bridget Hiroki BETWEEN MELISSA JOSEPHINE KATARINA HIROTI Applicant Date: 03 October 2016 DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC 2016 Chief Judge’s MB 800

3. [2022] NZIACDT 21 - CT v Nandan (18 August 2022) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...of Hamilton, until [date]. [4] The complainant, a national of India, had a work visa and was working in New Zealand. It is understood he was a restaurant manager. The complainant says that his employer was the former husband of Ms Nandan. [5] The complainant exchanged texts with Ms Nandan commencing in about June 2019 as he sought a pathway for residence. She advised him on 11 October he would need to make an application for a work visa. [6] On 23 October 2019, a services c...

4. [2025] NZIACDT 34 - KU v Wang (24 June 2025) [pdf, 125 KB]

   IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2025] NZIACDT 34 Reference No: IACDT 019/24 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY THE REGISTRAR OF IMMIGRATION ADVISERS Registrar BETWEEN KU Complainant AND BIN WANG Adviser SUBJECT TO SUPPRESSION ORDER DECISION Dated 24 June 2025 REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Self-repr

5. Auckland Standards Committee v RDM [2015] NZLCDT 26 [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...completed letter of direction; (f) Certified copy of the Death Certificate; (g) An encoded deposit slip of the practitioner’s trust account. [32] The Claim to Moneys held in a Deceased Customer’s account, which the widow completed, declared in clause 4 that she was the Next of Kin and entitled to claim the moneys that are available in the account. [33] Westpac paid the money held in the account to the trust account of the practitioner on 7 November 2008 where it remained in th...

6. [2010] NZCA 563 CA500/2010 Melville v Air New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 37 KB]

   LYNETTE MELVILLE V AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED CA CA500/2010 26 November 2010 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA500/2010 [2010] NZCA 563 BETWEEN LYNETTE MELVILLE Applicant AND AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Respondent Hearing: 16 November 2010 Court: O'Regan P, Hammond and Arnold JJ Counsel: G P Lloyd for Applicant T P Cleary for Respondent Judgment: 26 November 2010 at 4 pm JUDGMENT OF THE COURT A The application for leave to appeal is d

7. BG v YQ LCRO 161 / 2010 (4 April 2011) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...and the Practitioner concerning relationship property and other matters involving the care of children, and also the drafting of a Section 21 agreement. The nature of the letters suggest that that the relationship break up was not amicable. [5] The Applicant eventually filed complaints against the Practitioner. She alleged that the Practitioner (a) had a conflict of interest, (b) had lied, and (c) had failed to stick to the facts. Other general allegations were raised concernin...

8. Guidelines for Parties to Review [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...make an order for publication. In such cases, no publication of the name of an individual practitioner will occur unless that practitioner has first had an opportunity to make submissions on the matter of publication. 60. Notwithstanding clause 59, where the review application involves a Standards Committee decision to publish the practitioners name, the LCRO will take into account the Standards Committee reasons for the decision. Rex Maidment Legal Complaints Review Off...

9. Jones v Ratahi - Ngātitara 26B (2019) 403 Aotea MB 276 (403 AOT 276) [pdf, 343 KB]

   ...Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Ngātitara 26B Block BETWEEN JENNIFER RAUKURA JONES Applicant AND DIANE MARY KUMEA RATAHI ON BEHALF OF THE NGĀTITARA 26B TRUST Respondent Hearings: 20 June 2017, 372 Aotea MB 59-70 19 February 2019, 397 Aotea MB 46-52 (Heard at Te Hāwera) Appearances: J Jones in person P Bulfin for the Trust Judgment: 29 July 2019 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY

10. BN & QN v KE & B Ltd [2021] NZDT 1629 (30 June 2021) [pdf, 234 KB]

    ...the heading “Reasons Vehicle Failed its Inspection” in the VTNZ [Town A] check sheet, but these items were not marked as failures. Therefore I have dealt only with the five items clearly marked as failures on the VTNZ check sheet, as set out in Clause (a) above. (c) I have heard evidence from GD (Director/owner of B Ltd) and OT (the inspector employed by B Ltd who carried out the inspection. The best evidence I have about what is required to be checked as part of a WOF inspection a...