Search Results

1. [2021] NZEmpC 100 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...Paragraph [26] serves two functions. First, it is a link between the text of the affidavit and exhibit 9. Second, it stated Mr AlKazaz’s earlier willingness to settle for a sum of money significantly less than he was ultimately awarded. [5] The exhibit is a collection of correspondence between Mr AlKazaz’s then lawyer and Enterprise IT’s lawyer. It consists of a letter from his lawyer to Enterprise IT’s lawyer and several follow-up emails between them all of which are lab...

2. LCRO Guidelines for parties to review [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...LCRO may make an order for publication. In such cases, no publication of the name of an individual practitioner will occur unless that practitioner has first had an opportunity to make submissions on the matter of publication. 60. Notwithstanding clause 59, where the review application involves a Standards Committee decision to publish the practitioners name, the LCRO will take into account the Standards Committee reasons for the decision. Rex Maidment Legal Complaints Review Office...

3. [2015] NZEnvC 137 Tram Lease v Auckland Transport and Auckland Council [pdf, 813 KB]

   1 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Hearing at: Court: Appearances: Decision No. [2015] NZEnvC \~1 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under a decision on one of the Notices of Requirement for the City Rail Link pursuant to sl74 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) BETWEEN TRAM LEASE LIMITED (ENV-2014-AKL-000057) Appellant AND CJM INVESTMENTS LIMITED A party under s274 RMA AND AUCKLAND TRANSPORT Respondent/Requiring Authority AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Territorial Aut

4. [2021] NZACC 151 - Estate of Carl Snyman (30 September 2021) [pdf, 275 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 151 ACR 111/16 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN ESTATE OF CARL SNYMAN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 12 November 2020 Heard at: Nelson/Whakatu Supplementary Submissions and Joint memorandum Completed: 3 September 2

5. McQuade v Young & Ors as Trustees for the Maureen Young Family Trust [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...Respondent AND NICHOLAS NEBEN Twelfth Respondent Index Chapter Heading Page 1.0 BACKGROUND 3 2.0 PROPERTY AND THE PARTIES 6 3.0 CLAIMS 8 4.0 STATE OF THE DWELLINGHOUSE 10 5.0 CAUSATION 14 6.0 LIABILITY 19 5.2 First Respondents (Trustees) 19 6.3 First Named First Respondent (Maureen Young) 20 6.4 Second Respondent (Sam Young) 23 6.5 Fourth Respondent (Porirua City Co...

6. S Dwan v Park No 3 Trust & Ors [2013] NZWHT Auckland 10 [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...extensive water ingress and damage. Mr Milsom’s view was that the materials were not at fault so it was an issue relating to plaster application. [16] Mr Milsom referred to Nuplex Industries Flexicote product manufacturer technical data at clause 5: 5 Surface preparation It is the licensed contractor’s responsibility to inspect all areas which are to receive the Flexicote coating and report unsatisfactory conditions to the main contractor. Listed below are detailed sp...

7. BORA Crimes (Reasonable Parental Control and Correction) Amendment Bill [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...of the Bill of Rights Act, which affirms the right to freedom from discrimination on the grounds set out in s 21 of the Human Rights Act 1993. These grounds include age, which is defined as any age commencing with the age of 16 years. 36. Clause 5 of the Bill specifies instances in which the reasonable use of force by a parent, or person in place of a parent, against a child is justified. The Bill does not, however, define the term ‘child’. 37. The Crimes Act also does...

8. [2022] NZEnvC 124 Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga [pdf, 4.1 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 124 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under section 58 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 BE1WEEN POUTAMA KAITIAK.I CHARITABLE TRUST AND Court: Hearing: Last case event: Submissions: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: (ENV-2020-AKL-15 8) Appellant HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respondent Environment Judge MJL Dickey Environment Judge M Doo

9. Crozier - Succession to Molly Crozier [2023] Chief Judge's MB 531 (2023 CJ 531) [pdf, 304 KB]

   2023 Chief Judge's MB 531 Crozier - Succession to Molly Crozier [2023] Chief Judge's MB 531 (2023 CJ 531) I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District A20220015228 AP-20230000027093 CJ2022/44 WĀHANGA Under Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 M O L MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Succession to Molly Crozier also known as Molly Mullen also known as Muriwai Crozier a

10. River Oaks Farm Ltd & Ors as Trustees of Ingodwe Trust v Olsson [pdf, 136 KB]

    ...claim. • Secondly is the claim against the Piccolo Trust which sold the property to the claimant. It is alleged the Piccolo Trust had made a pre-contractual misrepresentation. The second leg of the claim against the Trust is that it breached clause 6.2(5) of the sale and purchase agreement. This part of the claim only involves Ingodwe Trust and the Piccolo Trust. • Thirdly there is the claim against the solicitors. This cause of action only involves Ingodwe Trust and Hol...