Search Results

1. XL v BF LCRO 04 / 2012 (19 July 2013) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...cafe business. While Ms XL complained in respect of a number of matters it appears that at the root of this complaint it is about the quantum of the fee charged by Mr BF in respect of the sale of Ms XL’s cafe business. The business sold for $54,000.00 The fee Mr BF charged for effecting the sale was $5,462.50. [2] The facts surrounding the complaint are: a. On 17 February 2011, Ms XL instructed Mr BF to help her to sell her cafe business, XYZ. Ms XL says that she instructed...

2. Belton - Karaka B No 2A No 3 (2017) 375 Aotea MB 136 (375 AOT 136) [pdf, 312 KB]

   ...were General land.12 The applicant has one month to file further submissions and evidence on this point. Decision [30] Pursuant to ss 37(3) and 244 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 the application is amended to include an application to vary clause 8 of the Kahukaka Whānau Trust order to provide that the trustees may alienate by way of sale, the share holding held by them in their capacity as trustees for the Karaka B No 2A No 3 block, from the corpus of the trust. [31] The app...

3. Li & Gao v CAC 408 & Riley & Loughran [2016] NZREADT 31 [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...these proceedings; discovery of documents in advance of the hearing, particularly for cross examination and submissions, will assist the parties and us in expeditiously resolving factual issues. [20] We have the specific power under Schedule 1, clause 6 of the Act to issue a summons to any person requiring that person to attend before us and give evidence. The summons may require the person to produce before us any “books, papers, documents, records, or things in that person’s poss...

4. IK v SN LCRO 42 / 2011 (21 February 2012) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...to the inability of the siblings to agree on the terms of a proposed extension of the mortgage. [4] Mr SM had known IK for a number of years. He also knew IL and IM and was aware of the impending sale. He was also IM’s attorney. 2 [5] Mr SM offered to mediate between the three siblings to enable them to reach agreement as to the terms on which the mortgage could be refinanced and the mortgagee sale averted. He also proposed a course of action which would see the proper...

5. Wall v Karaitiana - Tauhara Middle 15 Trust (2007) 85 Taupo MB 225 (85 TPO 225) [pdf, 370 KB]

   85 Taupo MB 225 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT Hearing: Counsel: Date: Introduction A20070002293 UNDER Section 237 and section 240 of the Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993. IN THE MATTER OF TAUHARA MIDDLE 15 TRUST.:-. BETWEEN AND 25 June 2007 (Heard at Rotorua) Direction as to execution of instrument and removal of trustee CHARLES TE EREAOWHAKAKOTAHI WALL, JOHN TAHAU, PETER CLARKE FRED NICOLL, ADRIAN PAERA TA Applicants HARVEY KARAITIANA

6. [2021] - NZREADT 09 - Complaints Assessment Committee 1905 v Papuni (24 February 2021) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZREADT 09 READT 018/20 IN THE MATTER OF charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BROUGHT BY COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE 1905 AGAINST JAMES WARREN PAPUNI Defendant On the papers Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Mr N O’Connor, Member Ms F Mathieson, Member Submissions received from: Ms C Paterson, on behalf of the Co

7. [2021] NZEnvC 073 Smith v Young [pdf, 782 KB]

   ...Gina Young (Youngs), whose earthworks caused the slip, and against Nelson City Council (NCC). NCC had issued the Youngs a resource consent for slip remediation and the Smiths had appealed NCC's decision to replace some consent conditions (RC175059 Variation 2). NCC is a respondent to the appeal proceedings but was also involved in the enforcement order proceedings. (2) Enforcement orders were issued and the consent appeal was resolved by consent order. 1 [2021] NZEnvC 56.

8. LCRO 137/2018 A1 v B2 (26 November 2018) [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...photographic evidence of your client highly intoxicated and using kronic. He would prefer not to go down this route and instead concentrate on moving forward and that is up to your client. In terms of Porse and Kindy there is no agreement that clause is retrospective. It does not read that way. Please confirm when in the next month [K] is enrolled to attend Porse and Kindy and I will take further instructions. [20] Context is important. The email of 11 December 2017 was written af...

9. [2023] NZEnvC 015 Omaka Valley Group Incorporated v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 656 KB]

   i -;� �1/ IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI OTAUTAHI IN THE MA TIER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 15 of the Resource Management Act 1991 appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act OMAKA VALLEY GROUP INCORPORATED ( ... continued on separate page) (ENV-2020-CH C-34) Appellants :MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent: Environment Judge J J M Hassan - sitting alone under s279 of the Act In

10. [2023] NZEnvC 049 Bay of Islands Maritime Park Incorporated v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 467 KB]

    ...The Court considers this matter needs to be resolved promptly and accordingly makes the following directions: (a) the Council is to file and serve its preferred provisions, the areas of dispute and its reasons for preferring its provisions by 5pm Friday, 17 March 2023; (b) the parties that disagree with the Council’s position are to file their response, including identifying the provision/s they disagree with and their reasons for preferring the alternative wording suggested by...