Search Results

1. QB v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 243 (26 March 2024) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...contract. 7. On 7 August 2023 QB signed a contract for [wedding package] at T Ltd. The total cost of the package was $35,937.50 plus GST. Shortly after the contract was signed QB paid a $17,000.00 deposit to T Ltd. 8. The contract provides in clause 3 that the deposit paid is non-refundable in the event of cancellation. At the hearing QB agreed that the contract provides that deposit she paid was non- refundable. 9. Before the contract was signed T LTD had sent QB an email abo...

2. [2019] NZEnvC 166 Lindis Catchment Group Incorporated v Otago Regional Council [pdf, 16 MB]

   ...Act LINDIS CATCHMENT GROUP INCORPORATED (ENV-2016-CHC-61) Appellant OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court : Environment Judge J R Jackson Environment Commissioner KA Edmonds Environment Commissioner R M Bartlett Hearing: at Wanaka on 5 to 9 November 2018 and at Cromwell on 12 to 16 November 2018 and on 28 to 30 January 2019 (Final submissions received 1 O July 2019) Appearances : P J Page and B Irving for Undis Catchment Group Incorporated as applicant A J Logan and T...

3. Yates v Te Kohanga Lots 1 and 3-27 Trust (2010) 13 Taitokerau MB 36 (13 TTK 36) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...June 2009 19 June 2009 23 July 2009 Appearances: Mr G Davis for Carla Yates Mr S Potter for the Te Kohanga Lots 1 and 3-27 Trust Judgment: 24 November 2010 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D J AMBLER Introduction [1] Carla Yates owns Lot 25 Te Kohanga (CFR NA 30A/904) (“Lot 25”).1 The land is general land and is situated at Shipwreck Bay, Ahipara. Ms Yates relies on access to Lot 25 through Lot 1 Te Kohanga (“Lot 1”) which is one of several blocks of Māori freehold...

4. [2019] NZEmpC 103 Saipe v Bethell [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...Saipe’s application was withdrawn by leave. However, it was accepted that the affidavit evidence filed by Mr Saipe in connection with his s 219 application would be considered for the purposes of the strike out application. Indisputable facts [5] Mr Saipe was employed by Ms Bethell as an administrator, commencing work in November 2012. There was no written employment agreement. [6] On 24 August 2013, she emailed the hours to be worked by Mr Saipe and said she could no long...

5. [2022] NZACC 110 – Hunter v ACC (9 June 2022) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...from the decision of a Reviewer dated 9 August 2019. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review of the Corporation’s decision dated 3 December 2018 declining Mr Hunter funding for surgery. Background [2] Mr Hunter was born in August 1951. He became a barista and journalist. 2 [3] On 13 March 2007, Mr Hunter fell off a ladder while cleaning the gutters of his house. He presented to the Emergency Department of the local hospital, where he was diagnosed with a fractu...

6. LCRO 68/2022 YE v AL (23 May 2023) [pdf, 200 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2023] NZLCRO 035 Ref: LCRO 68/2022 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN YE Applicant AND AL Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] Mr YE has applied for a

7. Soulsby v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2024] NZACC 102 (18 June 2024) [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...time prior to his release from prison. [19] The evidence before the Court included the available contemporaneous medical records, affidavit evidence from the applicant and his friends and family, 3 Accident Compensation Act 2001, Schedule 1, clause 43. 4 Soulsby v Accident Compensation Corporation [2021] NZACC 169. and various medical reports, including a report obtained by the applicant from Dr Burgess, dated 17 July 2021, regarding the applicant’s capacity for work. [20] Ju...

8. LCRO 39/2022 RD v QL and ZH (29 November 2023) [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...[Law Firm A] ([Law Firm A]) had acted for Mr RD. [4] The firm then known as [Law Firm B], acted for the Trust. Subsequently [Law Firm A] merged with [Law Firm B]. The merged firm became known as [Law Firm C Ltd] ([Law Firm C Ltd]). 2 [5] In 2018, Mr RD’s lease fell due for renewal. By that time, Mr FT had retired and as Ms QL had been a member of [Law Firm A], she acted for Mr RD at that time. [Law Firm C Ltd] also acted for the [Family Trust]. [6] The lease was then ren...

9. 2023-09-26-SOE_Michaela-Stout_Water-Abstraction.pdf [pdf, 240 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT WELLINGTON REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ROHE ENV-2023-WLG-000005 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 IN THE MATTER the direct referral of applications for resource consents and notices of requirement under sections 87G and 198E of the Act for the Ōtaki to North of Levin Project BY WAKA KOTAHI NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY Applicant STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF MICHAELA JAYNE STOUT ON BEHALF OF THE

10. 2023-10-11-MTA-Rebuttal-Evidence-of-D-Rump.pdf [pdf, 268 KB]

    ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ENV-2023-WLG-000005 Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of the direct referral of applications for resource consent and notices of requirement under sections 87G and 198E of the Act for the Ōtaki to North of Levin Project By Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency PROJECT RESPONSE EVIDENCE OF DIANNE RITA RUMP ON BEHALF OF MUAŪPOKO TRIBAL AUTH