5996 items matching your search terms
...and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN SOUTHLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE Applicant AND P Respondent DEPUTY CHAIR Judge J G Adams MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Hon P Heath QC Ms M Noble Ms G Phipps Prof D Scott HEARING 5 April 2022 HELD AT Auckland District Court DATE OF DECISION 28 April 2022 COUNSEL Mr P Collins for the Standards Committee Mr W Pyke for the Respondent 2 DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL RE CHARGES Overview and outco...
...agreed to becoming involved and at a telephone conference on 13 February 2020, agreed to act as Amicus. [3] The court acknowledges the work put in by Mr Schmidt in that role. [4] More recently, Ms Woodhouse has agreed to act for Mr Langdon. [5] At a telephone conference held on 5 August 2022 with Mr Evans, Mr Schmidt, Ms Woodhouse and Mr Langdon, it was agreed to set aside hearing time, commencing 26 September 2022 to work through the issues of the various appeals, with the goal o...
LEGAL ADVICE LPA 01 01 24 25 August 2021 Hon David Parker, Attorney-General Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990: New Zealand Public Health and Disability (Restriction on Crown Funding Agreements and Unfunded Cancer Medicines) Amendment Bill Purpose 1. We have considered whether the New Zealand Public Health and Disability (Restriction on Crown Funding Agreements and Unfunded Cancer Medicines) Amendment Bill (the Bill) a member’s Bill in the name of Dr Sha
...particular, he says his employment relationship problem as filed in the Authority related not to a dismissal grievance, but to a disadvantage grievance which the Authority did not consider. 1 Taniwha v Te Rūnanga o Toa Rangatira Inc [2022] NZERA 625 (Member O’Sullivan). [3] The parties agreed that after the filing of affidavit evidence, the challenge would be resolved on the papers. I am advised by the representatives that no submissions were filed. The Authority’...
.................................................................................................. 2 SCOPE OF EVIDENCE ..................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................... 5 BACKGROUND TO PC8 .................................................................................. 6 Development of PC8 ................................................................
447585.29#5586804v1 1 We have taken Mr De Pelsemaeker’s equivalent table as our template and where we deviate from him we have tracked changed our decision. 2 Public Health South filed a memorandum dated 10 December 2020 indicating its wish to withdraw from the proceedings. However, it is not clear whether it intended to withdraw its submission or simply not to appear in support, and so we have considered the submission. 3 The court has recorded a ‘reject’ decision in relation
RANGAHAUA WHANUI NATIONAL THEME L THE TRUST ADMINISTRATION OF MAORI RESERVES, 1840-1913 RALPH JOHNSON AUGUST 1997 FIRST RELEASE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other Rangahaua Whanui reports District reports District 1: Auckland (pt I), R Daamen, P Ramer, and Dr B Rigby; (pt 11), M Belgrave District 5B: Gisborne, S Daly District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B Bargh District 8: The Alienation of Maori Land in the Rohe Potae, C Marr District 9: The Whanganui Distr
...become Mr McAuley’s union (the New Zealand Engineering Printing and Manufacturing Union), during which period, on 27 November 2002, Mr McAuley was offered and accepted a first fixed term employment agreement beginning on 29 November 2002. [5] Mill maintenance, but not including fire services, was outsourced (performed by an independent contractor rather than by CHH’s own employees) to an international corporation known as ABB in January 2003. In the following month, on 24 F...
[2013] NZCOP 15 COP 012/13 UNDER The Copyright Act 1994 BETWEEN RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF NEW ZEALAND Applicant (Rights Owner) AND TELECOM NZ 4451 Respondents BEFORE THE COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL WARWICK SMITH HEARING ON THE PAPERS DECISION Introduction [1] This is an application by Recording Industry Association of New Zealand Incorporated (“the Applicant”) for an order under s.122O of the Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amen
...2018.3 [11] In its determination, the Authority first addressed an overtime issue. It concluded Ms van Kleef was entitled to refuse to work compulsory overtime which she had been instructed to perform. It found her CEA contained an availability clause which did not comply with the Act, so that overtime could not in those circumstances have been requested. Accordingly, she had successfully established a grievance to the effect that her employer had contravened s 67F of the Act, wh...