Search Results

1. LCRO 84/2020 WF v BP (11 June 2020) [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...brought to the attention of the applicant 2 for review.1 In the absence of proof to the contrary, service of the Committee’s decision is presumed to have occurred on the fifth working day after it is made, given or performed or exercised.2 [5] In order to comply with the statutory timeframe prescribed for filing a review application, Mr WF was required to file his review application on or before 5 PM on Thursday 7 May 2020. [6] Mr WF’s application was clearly filed out of...

2. Thomas v Accident Compensation Corporation (Suspension of Entitlements) [2024] NZACC 107 (26 June 2024) [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...was incorrect; 2 (b) WellNZ’s decision of 7 June 2023 to suspend entitlement to treatment for right knee contusion was correct; and (c) WellNZ’s decision of 7 June 2023 to decline weekly compensation for right knee contusion from 25 March 2023 onwards was correct. Background [2] Ms Thomas was born in December 1982 in India. She came to New Zealand in 2011. She worked as a nurse and her employer was the Auckland District Health Board.1 [3] From late 2017, Ms

3. [2023] NZEnvC 150 Port Marlborough NZ Ltd v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 667 KB]

   PORT MARLBOROUGH NEW ZEALAND LIMITED & ORS v MDC – pMEP TOPIC 3 – NATURAL CHARACTER (No 3) – CONSENT ORDER IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 150 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN PORT MARLBOROUGH NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (ENV-2020-CHC-49) (… continued on separate page) Appellants AND MARLBOROUGH DISTRI

4. [2006] NZEmpC WC 17/06 Bryson v Three Foot Six Ltd [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...However, I find that Mr Bryson did not know about his right or ability to raise a personal grievance until he got legal assistance well after the expiry of the 90-day period. [48] Ms Muir also submitted that, although there was a dispute resolution clause in the crew deal memo, Mr Bryson did not seek to invoke this which suggests that the issues which arose after his termination did not concern the termination and the 90-day provision would not have assisted Mr Bryson because he wou...

5. Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination – summary record 18th-20th reports (continued) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...authorities. With regard to the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, the Government had organized a series of consultations to which it had invited Maori. Furthermore, every free-trade agreement entered into by New Zealand contained an exemption clause allowing the Government to take any measures deemed necessary to fulfil its obligations under the Treaty of Waitangi. 12. Mr. Singham (New Zealand) said that 72 per cent of the participants in a survey on perceptions of discriminati...

6. FU v UN LCRO 244 / 2010 (6 October 2011) [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...signed until 21 May 2009, the terms of the agreement were effective as from 1 September 2008. From that date all profits 2 generated by the companies were to belong to FU. FV resigned as a director of both companies on 18 October 2009. [5] It is not necessary to recite all of the terms of the agreement, but the relevant facts are that the mould and the manufacturing licence for the ACC remained the property of ACA, the shares in which were then fully owned by FU, and he bec...

7. SM v ML LCRO 79 / 2011 (22 November 2012) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...discussion with the beneficiaries it was agreed that the Estate would enter into an agreement to sell the property to him. The agreement was conditional on finance being arranged by 12 November 2010 and SM instructed SQ to act on his behalf. [5] SM advised that funding for the purchase was to come from overseas. After two extensions of the conditional date SM requested a third extension. Although that was agreed by ML and SP they required the agreement to be amended to include:

8. Rudd v Hurunui – Horowhenua 11 Part Reservation [2018] Māori Appellate Court MB 123 (2018 APPEAL 123) [pdf, 348 KB]

   2018 Māori Appellate Court MB 123 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20170005519 UNDER Section 58 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal by Charles Rudd pursuant to section 58 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 against a decision of the Māori Land Court made on 19 July 2017 at 372 Aotea MB 171-178 relating to HOROWHENUA 11 PART RESERVATION TRUST BETWEEN CHARLES RUDD Appellant AND THE TRUST

9. [2021] NZEmpC 52 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Samra Holdings Ltd T/A Te Puna Liquor Centre [pdf, 235 KB]

   A LABOUR INSPECTOR OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT v SAMRA HOLDINGS LIMITED T/A TE PUNA LIQUOR CENTRE [2021] NZEmpC 52 [22 April 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 52 EMPC 87/2020 EMPC 365/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for the exercise of powers under sections 142B, 142E, 142J, 142M, 142W and 142X of the Employment Relations Act 2000

10. [2020] NZEnvC 109 Wellington Regional Council [pdf, 4.4 MB]

    ...• First Gas Ltd; • Fire and Emergency NZ; • Minister of Conservation; • WIAL; • Wairarapa Water Users. [4] On 16 July the Council filed a memorandum commenting on one aspect of the proposals put forward by the other parties. [5] The Court thanks all parties for engaging with the process and providing helpful suggestions on future mediation and the appropriate way to deal with those appeal points that are yet to be resolved or may or are to proceed to a hearing .