5995 items matching your search terms
366 Aotea MB 250 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20160005013 UNDER Section 315 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Kauangaroa No 2 MICHAEL JOHN CRANSTONE, CATHERINE ELIZABETH CARNSTONE AND PAUL ANTHONY KEENAN Applicants A20160005076 A20160005077 UNDER Section 134, 338(2) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Kapakapa 1 STANLEY ERUINI HIROTI Applicant Heari
...for the following reasons: (a) that application cannot be made under s 314(1)(f) of the RMA. Section 316(3) prevents the Applicant making such application more than three months after the date on which the Auckland Unitary Plan became operative (15 November BERNIE v AUCKLAND COUNCIL & ORS 2 2016). These applications were filed on or about 15 November 2017. Section 83 deems that, where s 316(3) does not apply, the plans have been prepared in accordance with the Act; (b) i...
...existing loading bay on the southern side of Tyler Street, immediately adjacent to the Glasshouse, shall be available to the public for loading at all times for the duration of the Works. (g) Subject to intermittent disruption permitted under sub-clause (j), how vehicle access to Adjacent Properties shall be maintained for the duration of the Works. Measures shall include (but not be limited to) the provision of a general traffic lane of at least 3.0m wide along the northern side of the c...
...found he had not been dismissed by Ultimate Siteworks Ltd and, accordingly, he had no unjustifiable dismissal grievance or any other type of grievance.1 [3] Mr Joyce also challenges the Authority’s costs determination that required him to pay $5,750 to Ultimate Siteworks as a contribution to its costs.2 [4] Ultimate Siteworks has applied for sanctions against Mr Joyce under s 140 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act) for a breach of a compliance order issued by the Author...
...COMZ-S7 in the Commercial Zone chapter of the PDP decisions version be amended as set out within Appendix 1 to this order (additions marked as underlined and deletions as strikethrough); 2 (2) the appeal is otherwise resolved. B: Under section 285 of the Resource Management Act 1991, there is no order as to costs. REASONS Introduction [1] This consent determination relates to an appeal by Van Den Brink Group Limited (Appellant) against the decisions of Waikato District Coun...
...the general poor construction on site. g) When Mr Reyes assumed responsibility for the design of the dwelling, he undertook to provide a set of plans that would Page | 9 comply with the requirements of the Building Code, particularly clauses B2 “durability”, E2 “external moisture” and E1 “surface water”. Mr Reyes’ plans lacked critical information that could and should have been provided to the developer during site visits. h) If Mr Reyes had not been...
...2007 and has instead identified that the complaint may disclose one or more of the grounds below: Page | 18 4.1 [List grounds of complaint being referred by Registrar, this should include legislative reference to the relevant section or clause] D Details of the Grounds Referred 5. [Repeat each of the grounds of complaint referred by Registrar in turn, with details of the information and reasoning on which the Registrar determined to refer that ground of complaint] E S...
...2007 and has instead identified that the complaint may disclose one or more of the grounds below: Page | 18 4.1 [List grounds of complaint being referred by Registrar, this should include legislative reference to the relevant section or clause] D Details of the Grounds Referred 5. [Repeat each of the grounds of complaint referred by Registrar in turn, with details of the information and reasoning on which the Registrar determined to refer that ground of complaint] E S...
...numbering of provisions and relevant planning maps resulting from (a) above. (2) the appeal points resolved by this order are dismissed. The appeals otherwise remain extant; (3) the aspects of the appeals recorded at [7] are dismissed. B: Under s285 RlvlA, there is no order as to costs REASONS Introduction [1] This proceeding concerns several appeals by Port Marlborough New Zealand Limited2 and others3 against part of a decision of the Marlborough District Council regarding provis...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 026 ACR 53/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN AIR NEW ZEALAND LTD Appellant AND LAVENDER, DANIEL First Respondent AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Second Respondent Hearing: 8 February 2024 Held at: Auckland District Court Appearances: A Sharp for the Appel