Search Results

1. Tito - Mangakahia 2B2 - No 2A1A [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 86 (2011 APPEAL 86) [pdf, 161 KB]

   TITO MAC 2011 Maori Appellate Court MB 86 23 February 2011 IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT 2011 Maori Appellate Court MB 86 (2011 APPEAL 86) A20100003263 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Mangakahia 2B2 - No 2A1A BETWEEN KEVIN JOHN TITO Appellant Hearing: 18 August 2010 (Heard at Whangarei) Court: Chief Judge W W Isaac (Presiding) Judge S Te A Milroy Judge S R Clark Judg

2. [2018] NZEnvC 241 Albert Road Investments Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.8 MB]

   ...ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 241 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act ALBERT ROAD INVESTMENTS LIMITED (ENV-2017-AKL-075) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Hearing: In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Decision: 18 December 2018 Date of Issue: 18 December 2018 DECISION AS TO COSTS A: Auckland Counci...

3. Provision of Public Information for the 2020 Referendums [pdf, 857 KB]

   ...draft exposure Bill, which will set out the proposed cannabis regulatory regime. Alongside this draft Bill, Justice is preparing a ‘guide to’ the Bill, which will assist voters in the interpretation of the legislation. The guide will explain the key clauses in the Bill, and how they work together, and with existing legislation. 16. The draft Bill and guide will be relatively technical documents. More accessible introductory-level information will be needed for voters who may b...

4. [2021] NZEnvC 065 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 576 KB]

   ...reply in support of its application for costs dated 23 April 2021 · 1 7 MAY 2021 1 7 MAY 2021 DECISION AS TO COSTS (, oyal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated v Northland egional Council 2 A: Under section 285 Resource Management Act 1991 the Environment Court declines the application by Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated for costs against Northport Limited. B: Costs are to lie where they fall REASONS Intro...

5. Central Standards Committee 3 v Hunt [2023] NZLCDT 12 (28 April 2023) [pdf, 278 KB]

   ...commercial transaction, and in which he failed to observe the principle just described. [4] The hearing, therefore, focused on what would be a proportionate penalty for Mr Hunt, who is now retired and in poor health. Issue for determination [5] Because there was an agreed summary of facts and common ground on penalty principles, the major issues for determination were: 1. Where this matter fitted in the spectrum of professional misconduct; and 2. What penalty would be consiste...

6. [2022] NZEmpC 138 Pilgrim v Attorney-General [pdf, 247 KB]

   ...whether the factual findings relied on relate specifically to Courage or to Gloriavale as a whole. This is because, they say, the fair-minded observer is not a lawyer and does not read judgments forensically to ascertain the precise meaning of each clause and sentence. In this regard it is argued that the overall impression is equally important. [10] I do not accept this submission. It sits at odds with the description of the fair- minded observer described in Saxmere:10 …befo...

7. [2025] NZREADT 23 - NW v CAC 2204 & Ors (23 June 2025) [pdf, 266 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2025] NZREADT 23 Reference No: READT 035/2024 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN NW Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 2204) First Respondent AND OE Second Respondent AND ST Third Respondent AND GI Fourth Respondent Hearing on the papers Tribunal: C Sandelin (Deputy Chair) G Denley (Member) F Mathi

8. [2019] NZEnvC 032 Tauranga City Council v Minister of Education [pdf, 917 KB]

   ...issue of quantum, whether in terms of its calculation or its reasonableness, arises in respect of this jurisdictional issue. Such matters may well arise if this Court answers the question in the affirmative, but do not need to be considered now. [5] The question is stated in general terms and does not necessarily depend on any particular facts. Nonetheless, in law context is everything' and in any event an outline of the context is likely to assist readers in understanding how...

9. Waitangi Tribunal theme K - Māori Land Councils and Māori Land Boards [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   ...would ac~ as an agent for block committees, arranging for the lease of such lands as the committees decided to vest in it, and would have all the powers of the Native Land Court over such lands. 'The Judges of the Native Land Court', one clause of this 'Papawai Bill' cheerfully declared, 'are hereby dispensed with'. Opponents of the original Protection Bill continued to mobilise over the winter of 1898.51 A committee was set up, based in Wellington, to lobby...

10. [2010] NZEmpC 87 Melville v Air New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 56 KB]

    ...to the 90-day issue, because her assumption was that this had already been attended to. [11] In cross-examination by Mr Cleary, Mrs Melville acknowledged that she was aware that in the collective agreement that bound her there were clauses about how to resolve disputes. She confirmed that she had instructed Mr Townsend to write the 19 March letter and that she was concerned that the manager had decided that she was going to be dismissed. She confirmed that after she...